Advertisement

Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation

Chapter

Abstract

Traditional knowledge is increasingly recognized as valuable for adaptation to climate change, bringing scientists and indigenous peoples together to collaborate and exchange knowledge. These partnerships can benefit both researchers and indigenous peoples through mutual learning and mutual knowledge generation. Despite these benefits, most descriptions focus on the social contexts of exchange. The implications of the multiple cultural, legal, risk-benefit and governance contexts of knowledge exchange have been less recognized. The failure to consider these contexts of knowledge exchange can result in the promotion of benefits while failing to adequately address adverse consequences. The purpose of this article is to promote awareness of these issues to encourage their wider incorporation into research, policy, measures to implement free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) and the development of equitable adaptation partnerships between indigenous peoples and researchers.

Keywords

Indigenous People Traditional Knowledge Climate Change Adaptation Knowledge Exchange Traditional Ecological Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AIPP (2012) Indigenous peoples and climate change adaptation in Asia. Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP), Thailand, 24 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Amankwah HA (2007) Traditional values and modern challenges in property law. J South Pac Law 11:18–38Google Scholar
  3. Anaya SJ (2009) International human rights and indigenous peoples. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bannister K (2004) Indigenous knowledge and traditional plant resources of the Secwepemc first nation. In: Riley M (ed) Indigenous intellectual property rights: Legal obstacles and innovative solutions. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, pp 279–308Google Scholar
  5. Berlces F (1993) Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. In: Inglis JT (ed) Traditional ecological knowledge; concepts and cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Ottawa, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  6. Berkes F (2009) Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change. J R Soc N Z 39:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F (2012) Sacred ecology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkett M (2013) Indigenous environmental knowledge and climate change adaptation. In: Abate RS, Kronk EA (eds) Climate change and indigenous peoples: The search for legal remedies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 96–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter KA, Katyal SK, Riley AR (2009) In defense of property. Yale Law J 118: I 022–1125Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter KA, Katyal SK, Riley AR (2010) Clarifying cultural property. Int J Cult Prop 17:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clements R, Haggar J, Quezada A, Torres J (2011) Technologies for climate change adaptation—agriculture sector. UNEP Risø Centre, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  12. Coombe RJ (2009) The expanding purview of cultural properties and their politics. Annu Rev Law Soc Scie 5:393–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curci J (2010) The protection of biodiversity and traditional knowledge in international Law of intellectual property. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson-Hunt IJ, Turner KL, Mead ATP, Cabrera-Lopez J, Bolton R, Idrobo CJ, Miretski I, Morrison A, Robson JP (2012) Biocultural design: a new conceptual framework for sustainable development in rural indigenous and local communities. Sapiens 5:33–45Google Scholar
  15. Doremus HD, Tarlock AD (2008) Water War in the Klamath basin: Macho Law, combat biology, and dirty politics. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Egeru A (2012) Role of indigenous knowledge in climate change adaptation: a case study of the teso Subregion, eastern Uganda. Indian J Tradit Knowl 11 :217–224Google Scholar
  17. Fienup-Riordan A, Rearden A (2010) The ice is always changing: Yup’ik understandings of sea ice, past and present. In: Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) SIKU: knowing Our Ice: Documenting Inuit Sea Ice knowledge and Use. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–328Google Scholar
  18. Fletcher MLM (2012) Resisting congress: Free speech and tribal law. In: Carpenter KA, Fletcher MLM, Riley AR (eds) The Indian civil rights Act at forty. UCLA American Indian Studies Center, Los Angeles, pp 133–158Google Scholar
  19. FSC (2012) FSC Guidelines for the Implementation of the Right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC). Version 1. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), BonnGoogle Scholar
  20. Girot P, Ehrhart C, Oglethorpe JwR, Hannah, Rossing T, Gambarelli G, Jeans H, Barrow E, MartinS, Ikkala N, Phillips J (2011) Integrating Community and Ecosystem-Based Approaches in Climate Change Adaptation Responses. Ecosystems and Livelihoods Adaptation Network (ELAN), p. 19ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodman EC (2000) Protecting habitat for off-reservation tribal hunting and fishing rights: tribal comanagement as a reserved right. Environl Law 30:279-361Google Scholar
  22. Green D, Raygorodetsky G (201 0) Indigenous knowledge of a changing climate. Clim Chang 100:239–242Google Scholar
  23. Hardison PD, Bannister K (2011) Ethics in ethnobiology: History, international law and policy, and contemporary issues. In: Anderson EN, Pearsall D, Hunn E, Turner N (eds) Ethnobiology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken New Jersey, pp 27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helfer LR, Austin GW (2011) Human rights and intellectual property: Mapping the global interface. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill R, Grant C, George M, Robinson CJ, Jackson S, Abel N (2012) Typology of indigenous engagement in Australian environmental management: Implications for knowledge integration and socialecological system sustainability. Ecol Soc 17(1):23Google Scholar
  26. Hiwasaki L (2012) ‘Water for Life’.. water for whose life? water, cultural diversity and sustainable develop ment in the united nations. In: Johnston BR (ed) Water, cultural diversity, and global environmental change: Emerging trends, sustainable futures? Springer, Berlin, pp 509–531Google Scholar
  27. Huntington HP (2000) Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appll0(5):1270–1274Google Scholar
  28. Johnston BR (2012) Water, cultural diversity, and global environmental change: Emerging trends, sustainable futures? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kipuri N (2009) Culture. in UNDSP (ed.) State of the world's indigenous peoples. united nations division for social policy and development—Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, New York, New York, pp. 52–81Google Scholar
  30. Laird S, Wynberg R (2008) Access and benefit-sharing in practice: Trends in Partnerships Across Sectors. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD), Montreal, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  31. Little Bear L (2000) Jagged worldviews colliding. In: Battiste M(ed) Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 77–85Google Scholar
  32. Mason L, White G, Gea M (2012) Listening and learning from traditional knowledge and Western Science: a dialogue on contemporary challenges of forest health and wildfire. J For 110:187–193Google Scholar
  33. McLean KG (2010) Advance guard: Climate change impacts, adaptation. Mitigation and Indigenous Peoples. United Nations University—Traditional Knowledge Initiative, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  34. McManis C, Tenán Y (2011) Trends and scenarios in the legal protection of traditional knowledge. In: Wong T, Dutfield G (eds) Intellectual property and human development: current trends and future scenarios. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 139—166Google Scholar
  35. Moerman DE (1998) Native American ethnobotany. Timber Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakashima DJ, Galloway McLean K, Thulstrup HD, Ramos Castillo A, Rubis JT (2012) Weathering uncertainty: Traditional knowledge for climate change assessment and adaptation. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), ParisGoogle Scholar
  37. Nie M (2008) The Use of co-management and protected land-use designations to protect tribal cultural resources and reserved treaty rights on Federal Lands. Nat Res J 48:585–647Google Scholar
  38. Noble B (2009) Owning as belonging/owning as property: The crisis of power and respect in first nations heritage transactions with Canada. In: Bell C, Napoleon V (eds) First nations cultural heritage and Law: Case studies, voices, and perspectives. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 465–488Google Scholar
  39. Pevar S (2012) The rights of Indians and tribes. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Richards RT, Alexander SJ (2006) A social history of wild huckleberry harvesting in the pacific northwest. US department of agriculture forest. Service—Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  41. Riley AR (2005) “Straight stealing”: towards an indigenous system of cultural property protection. Wash Law Rev 80:69-165Google Scholar
  42. Riley AR (2007) Good (native) governance. Columbia Law Rev 107:1049–1125Google Scholar
  43. Smith C (2010) Full faith and credit in cross-jurisdictional recognition of tribal court decisions revisited. Calif Law Rev 98:1393–1436Google Scholar
  44. Thom B, Bain D (2004) Aboriginal intangible property in Canada: An ethnographic review. Industry Canada - Marketplace Framework Policy Branch, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  45. Thornton TF, Scheer AM (2012) Collaborative engagement of local and traditional knowledge and science in marine environments: a review. Ecol Soc 17:8Google Scholar
  46. Timbrook J (1987) Virtuous herbs: plants in Chumash medicine. J Ethnobiol 7:171–180Google Scholar
  47. Trosper RL, Clark F, Gerez-Fernandez P, Lake F,McGregor D, PetersCM, Purata S, Ryan T, Thomson A,Watson AE, Wyatt S (2012) North America. In: Parrotta JA, Trosper RL (eds) Traditional forest-related knowledge: Sustaining communities, ecosystems, and biocultural diversity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 15–201Google Scholar
  48. Tsosie R (2007) Cultural challenges to biotechnology: native American genetic resources and the concept of cultural harm. J Law, Med Ethics 36:396–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsosie R (2013) Climate change and indigenous peoples: Comparative models of sovereignty. In: Abate RS, Kronk EA (eds) Climate change and indigenous peoples: The search for legal remedies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weatherhead E, Gearheard S, Barry RG (2010) Changes in weather persistence: insight from Inuit knowledge. Glob Env Change 20:523–528Google Scholar
  51. WIPO (2012) Intellectual property and genetic resources, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. WIPO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  52. Wynberg, R, Schroeder, D, Chennells, R (2009) Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons from the San-Hoodia Case. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tulalip Tribes Natural Resources Office of Treaty RightsTulalipUSA

Personalised recommendations