Advertisement

Do Inequality-Based Entry Barriers Deter the Formation of Female-Owned Firms in Nigeria?

  • Tiffany R. Bussey
  • Juliet U. Elu
  • Gregory N. Price
Chapter
Part of the Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development book series (AAESPD)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the role of inequality-based entry barriers on the formation of female-owned firms in Nigeria. With data from the 2010 World Enterprise Survey, we estimate the parameters of a simple model of female-owned firm entry to determine the role of inequality-based barriers on the number of female-owned firms across city-industry clusters in Nigeria. Parameter estimates from count data specifications of firm entry reveal that access to financing, land, and licenses/permits absolutely deter the entry of female-owned firms, as these entry barriers are proportional to the probability of observing no female-owned firms. In general, barriers to securing land constrain the entry of female-owned firms beyond the process determining absolute entry deterrence. This suggests that the market entry and underrepresentation of female-owned among firm-owners and entrepreneurs in Nigeria is, at least in part, caused by gender inequality in general. As private firm output dominates the gross domestic product of modern economies, our findings suggest that the reduction of gender inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa would result in more female-owned and entrepreneurs which would catalyze economic growth.

Keywords

Gender Inequality Entrepreneurship Nigeria Economic growth 

References

  1. Akaike H (1998) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer, New York, NY, pp 199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand S, Sen A (2000) The income component of the human development index. J Hum Dev 1:83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arauzo-Carod J-M, Segarra-Blasco A (2005) The determinants of entry are not independent of start-up size: some evidence from Spanish manufacturing. Rev Ind Organ 27:147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asiedu E, Kalonda-Kanyama I, Ndikumana L, Nti-Addae A (2013) Access to credit by firms in Sub-Saharan Africa: how relevant is gender? Am Econ Rev 103:293–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audretsch DB (2007) Entrepreneurship capital and economic growth. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 23:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bain Joe S (1956) Barriers to new competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baliamoune-Lutz M, McGillivray M (2009) Does gender inequality reduce growth in Sub-Saharan African and Arab countries? Afr Dev Rev 21:224–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbosa N, Guimaraes P, Woodward D (2004) Foreign firm entry in an open economy: the case of Portugal. Appl Econ 36:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belleflamme P, Picard P, Thisse J-F (2000) An economic theory of regional clusters. J Urban Econ 48:158–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. British Council of Nigeria (2012) Gender in Nigeria report 2012: improving the lives of girls and women in Nigeria, issues, policies, action, 2nd edn. AbujaGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elu JU (2013) NEA presidential address: gender inequality and human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Rev Black Polit Econ 40:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feinberg RM (2010) Price impacts of small-firm entry in US manufacturing. East Econ J 36:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100:1126–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallward-Driemeier M (2011) Strengthening women’s entrepreneurship, The Africa competitiveness report. World Bank, Washington DC, pp 67–88Google Scholar
  16. Khemani RS, Shapiro DM (1986) The determinants of new plant entry in Canada. Appl Econ 18:1243–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koellinger PD, Roy Thurik A (2012) Entrepreneurship and the business cycle. Rev Econ Stat 94:1143–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lambert D (1992) Zero-inflated poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McMillan J, Woodruff C (2002) The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. J Econ Perspect 16:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mullahy J (1986) Specification and testing of some modified count data models. J Econom 33:341–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orr D (1974) The determinants of entry: a study of the canadian manufacturing industries. Rev Econ Stat 56:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Price GN (1995) The determinants of entry for black-owned commercial banks. Q Rev Econ Finance 35:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiffany R. Bussey
    • 1
  • Juliet U. Elu
    • 2
  • Gregory N. Price
    • 3
  1. 1.Morehouse Entrepreneurship CenterAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsMorehouse CollegeAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.School of BusinessLangston UniversityLangstonUSA

Personalised recommendations