Why Should Economics Give Chaos Theory Another Chance?

Chapter
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

Economic data provide little evidence -if any- of linear, simple dynamics, and of lasting convergence to stationary states or regular cyclical behavior. In spite of this the linear approach absolutely dominates mainstream economics. The problem is that mainstream economics is now in deep crisis. The recent financial crisis clearly showed that orthodox economics was quite unprepared to deal with it. Most mainstream economists not only did not foresee the depth of the current crisis, they not even consider it possible. It is well known since the famous contribution of Mandelbrot (1963) that many economic and financial time series have fat tails, i.e. that the probability of extreme events is higher than if the data-generating process were normal. However, the usual practice among orthodox economists has been to assume-implicitly or explicitly- a normal distribution. Orthodox economists represent the economy as a stable equilibrium system resembling the planetary one. The concept of equilibrium plays a key role in traditional economics. This approach is useful in normal, stable times. However, it is incapable of dealing with unstable, turbulent, chaotic times. The crisis has clearly showed this. Heterodox contributions shed much more light on what happens during these crucial periods in which a good part of the economy is reshaped; they provide powerful insights towards what policies to follow in those extraordinary circumstances. However, they remain as theories mainly suitable for those periods of instability and crisis. The challenge is to arrive at a unified theory valid both for normal and abnormal times. In this respect, the complexity approach with its use of non-linear models offers the advantage that the same model allows to describe stable as well as unstable and even chaotic behaviors. Although the results of chaos tests do not prove so far the existence of chaos in all economic variables they are consistent with its existence. The detection of chaos in economic time series faces three types of difficulties: (1) the limited number of observations such series contain; (2) the high noise level in economic time series; and (3) the high dimension of economic systems. However, topological methods for chaos detection seem to be a highly promising tool. On the other hand, in economics, there are no such things as crucial experiments. Economists seldom practice the falsificationism they preach. Confidence in the implications of economics derives from confidence in its axioms rather than from testing their implications. Therefore, non-linear dynamics and chaos theory should not be subject to more stringent rules than what is usual for the rest of economic theory.

Keywords

Chaos Determinism Economic methodology Nonlinearity Predictability 

References

  1. Altavilla, C., De Grauwe, P.: Non-linearities in the relation between the exchange rate and its fundamentals. Int. J. Finance Econ. 15(1), 1–21 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, B.W.: Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994)Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S.N., Lane, D.A. (eds.): The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)Google Scholar
  4. Arthur, W.B.: Complexity, the Santa Fe approach and nonequilibrium economics. In: Faucci, R., Marchionatti, R. (eds.) History of Economic Ideas. Fabrizio Serra Editore, Rome (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Bala, V., Majumdar, M., Mitra, T.: Controlling Chaos: Some Analytical Results and Applications to Tattonement. Cornell University, Ithaca Center for Analytic Economics (1996)Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, W. A., He, Y.: Unsolved econometric problems in nonlinearity, Chaos, and Bifurcation. Working papers series in theoretical and applied economics. University of Kansas, Department of Economics No 201231 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, W. A., Serletis, A.: Martingales, nonlinearity, and chaos. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 24(5–7), 703–24 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Bak, P., Chen, K.: Self-organized criticality. Sci Am. 264(1), 46–53 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. Baumol, W., Benhabib, J.: Chaos: significance, mechanism, and economic implications. J. Econ. Perspect. 3(1), 77–105 (1989)Google Scholar
  10. Bayar, L.B.: Chaos Theory and its Importance and Applications in Economics. Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Economics, T.C, Istanbul (2005)Google Scholar
  11. Beker, P.F.: Are inefficient entrepreneurs driven out of the market? J. Econ. Theory 114, 329–344 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Beker, V.A.: Is Economics a Science? A Discussion of Some Methodological Issues (2005). http://ssrn.com/abstract=839307
  13. Beker, V.A.: Per una teoria economica del non-equilibrio. Note economiche: rivista economica del Monte dei Paschi di Siena 24(1), 20–34 (1994)Google Scholar
  14. Beker, V.A.: Non-linear dynamics and Chaos in economics. In: Dahiya, S.B. (ed.) The Current State of Economic Science, vol. 1, pp. 169–193. Spellbound Publications, Rohtak (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Blume, L., Easley, D.: Evolution and market behavior. J. Econ. Theory 58, 9–40 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blume, L., Easley, D.: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Belief selection in completeand incomplete markets. Econometrica 74, 929–966 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. Boldrin, M.: The impact of chaos on economic theory. In: Grebogi, C., Yorke, J. (eds.) Impact of Chaos on Science and Society, pp. 275–297. United Nations University Press. New York (1997)Google Scholar
  18. Brock, W.: Pathways to randomness in the economy: emergent nonlinearity and chaos in economics and finance. Estudios Econ. 8, 3–55 (1993)Google Scholar
  19. Brock, W.A.: Asset price behavior in complex environments. In: Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S.N., Lane, D.A. (eds.) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, pp. 385–423. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)Google Scholar
  20. Daubechies, I.: Ten Lectures on Wavelets. CBMS-NSF Lecture Notes No. 61. SIAM, Philadelphia (1992)Google Scholar
  21. Day, R.H.: Complex Economic Dynamics, An Introduction to Dynamical Systems and Market Mechanisms, vol. I. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  22. De Grauwe, P., Grimaldi, M.: The Exchange Rate in a Behavioural Finance Framework. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)Google Scholar
  23. De Grauwe, P., Rovira Kaltwasser, P.: Animal spirits in the foreign exchange market. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36(8),1176–1192 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. Faggini, M.: Chaos detection in economics. Metric versus topological tools. MPRA Paper No. 30928. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30928/ (2010)
  25. Faggini, M.: Chaotic time series analysis in economics: balance and perspectives. Working Paper No. 25. Universitá degli Studi di Torino, Department of Economics and Public Finance. http://web.econ.unito.it/prato/papers/n25.pdf (2011)
  26. Faggini, M., Parziale, A.: The failure of economic theory. Lessons from chaos theory. Mod. Econ. 3, 1–10 (2012). www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?paperID=16802
  27. Frankel, J., Froot, K.: Chartists, fundamentalists, and trading in the foreign exchange market. Am. Econ. Rev. 80(2), 181–185 (1990)Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, M.: The methodology of positive economics. In: Friedman, M. (ed.) Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1953)Google Scholar
  29. Gao, J., Sultan, H., Hu, J., Tung, W.W.: Denoising nonlinear time series by adaptive filtering and wavelet shrinkage: a comparison. IEEE Signal Proces. Lett. 17(3), 127 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. Goldstein, J.: Attractors and Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Plexus Institute, Bordentown (2011). http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.plexusinstitute.org/resource/resmgr/files/deeperlearningspring2011.pdf
  31. Guégan, D., Hoummiya, K.: Denoising with wavelets method in chaotic time series: application in climatology, energy and finance. In: Abbott, D., Bouchaud, J.P., Gabaix, X., McCaulay, J.L. (eds.) Noise and Fluctuations in Econophysics and Finance. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5848, pp. 174–185. (2005)Google Scholar
  32. Hausman, D.M.: The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawkins, S.: A Brief History of Time. Bantam Books, London (1988)Google Scholar
  34. Hommes, C., Manzan, S.: Testing for nonlinear structure and chaos in economic time. A comment. J. Macroecon. 28(1), 169–174. Elsevier (2006)Google Scholar
  35. Hommes, C., Wagener, F.: Complex evolutionary systems in behavioral finance. In: Hens, T., Schenk-Hopp, K.R. (eds.) Handbook of Financial Markets: Dynamics and Evolution. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  36. Horgan, J.: From complexity to perplexity. Sci. Am. 272(6), 104–109 (1995)Google Scholar
  37. Katz, F.: Methodological Contributions of Chaos Theory to Economic Thought (2002). http://staffnet.kingston.ac.uk/ku32530/PPE/katz.pdf
  38. Kyrtsou, C., Serletis, A.: Univariate tests for nonlinear structure. J. Macroecon. 28(1), 154–168. Elsevier (2006)Google Scholar
  39. LeBaron, B.: Building financial markets with artificial agents: desired goals, and present techniques. In: Karakoulas, G. (ed.) Computational Markets. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  40. Li, H., Jr, Barkley Rosser: Emergent volatility in asset markets with heterogeneous agents. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 6, 171–180 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lucas, R.E.: Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46(6), 1429–1445 (1978)Google Scholar
  42. Mandelbrot, B.: The variation of certain speculative prices. J. Bus. 36(4), 394–419 (1963)Google Scholar
  43. Martelli, M., Dang, M., Seph, T.: Defining chaos. Math. Mag. 71, 112–122 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Milgrom, P., Stokey, N.: Information, trade and common knowledge. J. Econ. Theory 26, 17–27 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. North, D.C.: Economic performance through time. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(3), 359–368 (1994)Google Scholar
  46. Ott, E., Grebogi, C., Yorke, J.A.: Controlling chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1196–1199 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosser, J.B.: On the complexities of complex economic dynamics. J. Econ. Perspect. Fall 13(4), 169–192 (1999)Google Scholar
  48. Ruelle, D.: Turbulence, Strange Attractors, and Chaos. World Scientific, Singapore (1994)Google Scholar
  49. Salzano, M.: The Analysis of Extreme Events - Some Forecasting Approaches. In: Perna, C., Sibillo, M. (eds.) Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Insurance and Finance. Springer, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  50. Samuelson, P.A.: Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  51. Scheinkmann, J., Woodford, M.: Self-organized criticality and economic fluctuations. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(2), 417–421 (1994) (Papers and Proceedings)Google Scholar
  52. Schumpeter, J.A. (1987). History of Economic Analysis. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Starrett, J.: Non-strange chaotic attractors equivalent to their templates. Dyn. Sys. Int. J. 27(2), 187–196 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tirole, J.: On the possibility of speculation under rational expectations. Econometrica 50(5), 1163–1181 (1982)Google Scholar
  55. Vitolo, R., Holland, M.P., Ferro, C.: Robust extremes in chaotic desterministic systems. Chaos 19(4), 043127 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Belgrano and University of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations