Skip to main content

From a Sensorimotor to a Sensorimotor++ Account of Embodied Conceptual Cognition

  • Conference paper
Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 15))

Abstract

Since the publication of O’Regan and Noë’s original article in Behavioral and Brain Sciences in 2001, which first set out the sensorimotor account by which sensory experience and motor engagement are inextricably intertwined, there have been not just one but many sensorimotor accounts. However, in many ways that original article remains the canonical account. In this paper, I discuss a particular theory of concepts from philosophy of mind – the unified conceptual space theory, based on Peter Gärdenfors’ conceptual spaces theory – and, in that light, set out what I take to be the key points of the 2001 account, along with its strengths and weaknesses. I discuss the ways in which the 2001 account aligns with, and departs from, the unified conceptual space theory; and I offer an extension to it that I call sensorimotor++, which adds to the 2001 account a key role for emotional affect and the somatosensory system, with which one might ground salience, and a key role for (so-called ‘mental’) representation, properly understood. I argue that sensorimotor++ makes for a better theory of concepts – one that is not just embedded and embodied but enactive – and, perhaps, a better sensorimotor theory more broadly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berkeley, G.: Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford University Press (1999), a Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge was first published in 1710.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, R.A.: Elephants don’t play chess. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 6, 3–15 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 139–159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buhrmann, T., Paolo, E.D., Barandiaran, X.: A dynamic systems account of sensorimotor contingencies. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 1–19 (2013), doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalmers, D.J.: Facing up to the hard problem of consciousness. In: Hameroff, S.R., Kaszniak, A.W., Scott, A. (eds.) Toward a Science of Consciousness: The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, pp. 5–28. MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, A.: Rick: Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior 7(1), 5–16 (1999), http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Damasio, A.: The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. Vintage (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, G.: Varieties of Reference. Clarendon Press (1982), edited by John McDowell

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fodor, J.A.: The Language of Thought. Crowell (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fodor, J.A.: Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Fodor, J.A.: LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallese, V., Lakoff, G.: The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(3-4), 455–479 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Bradford Books (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grush, R., Churchland, P.: Gaps in Penrose’s toilings. In: Metzinger, T. (ed.) Conscious Experience, pp. 185–214. Imprint Academic (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grush, R.: The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 377–442 (2004), http://escholarship.org/uc/item/15t2595z

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harvey, I.: Untimed and misrepresented: Connectionism and the computer metaphor (CSRP 245), university of Sussex (UK) Cognitive Science Research Papers (CSRP) series (1992), http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/inmanh/harvey92untimed.pdf

  18. Haugeland, J.: Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. MIT Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Held, R., Hein, A.: Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 56(5), 872–876 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hofstadter, D.: Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Penguin (2000), 20th Anniversary edition

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hutto, D.D.: Knowing what? radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4, 389–405 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaegher, H.D., Paolo, E.D., Gallagher, S.: Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Science (2010) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Laurence, S., Margolis, E.: Radical concept nativism. Cognition 86, 25–55 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Machery, E.: Doing Without Concepts. Oxford University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maturana, H.: Cognition. In: Hejl, P.M., Köck, W.K., Roth, G. (eds.) Wahrnehmung und Kommunikation, pp. 29–49. Peter Lang, Frankfurt (1978), http://www.enolagaia.com/M78bCog.html (with the original page numbering retained)

  26. Maturana, H., Varela, F.J.: Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science). Kluwer Academic Publishers (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J.: The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Shambhala, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Millikan, R.: A common structure for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: More mama, more milk, and more mouse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 55–100 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morse, A., Ziemke, T.: The somatic sensory hypothesis (2010) (unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Newell, A.: Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science 4(2), 135–183 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Noë, A.: Action in Perception. MIT Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Noë, A.: Vision without representation. In: Nivedita, G., Madary, M., Spicer, F. (eds.) Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems, pp. 245–256. Oxford University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Novak, J., Canas, A.: The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. technical report, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (January 2008), http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf

  34. O’Regan, J.K., Noë, A.: A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Beha 24, 939–1031 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. O’Regan, K., Myin, E., Noë, A.: Sensory consciousness explained (better) in terms of ‘corporality’ and ‘alerting capacity’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4, 369–387 (2005), doi:10.1007/s11097-005-9000-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parthemore, J.: Concepts Enacted: Confronting the Obstacles and Paradoxes Inherent in Pursuing a Scientific Understanding of the Building Blocks of Human Thought. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK (March 2011), http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/6954/1/Parthemore

  37. Parthemore, J.: Of boundaries and metaphysical starting points: Why the extended mind cannot be so lightly dismissed. Teorema 30(2), 79–94 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Parthemore, J.: Representations, symbols, icons, concepts.. and why there are no mental representations. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the Nordic Association for Semiotic Studies, May 6-8 2011 (2013) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Parthemore, J.: The unified conceptual space theory: An enactive theory of concepts. Adaptive Behavior (2013) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Parthemore, J., Morse, A.F.: Representations reclaimed: Accounting for the co-emergence of concepts and experience. Pragmatics & Cognition 18(2), 273–312 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Penrose, R.: Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford University Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Perry, J.: Thought without representation. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 60, pp. 137–151 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Prinz, J.: Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. MIT Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rosch, E.: Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7, 573–605 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization. In: Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (eds.) Concepts: Core Readings, ch. 8, pp. 189–206. MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ryle, G.: The Concept of Mind. Penguin (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sharples, M.: How We Write: An Account of Writing as Creative Design. Routledge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sonesson, G.: The mind in the picture and the picture in the mind: A phenomenological approach to cognitive semiotics. Lexia: Rivista di Semiotica 7-8, 167–182 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Steiner, P., Stewart, J.: From autonomy to heteronomy (and back): The enaction of social life. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8, 527–550 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stewart, J.: Cognition = life: Implications for higher-level cognition. Behavioural Processes 35(1-3), 311–326 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Thompson, E.: Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thompson, E., Stapleton, M.: Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi. 28(1), 23–30 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Varela, F.J.: Laying down a path in walking. In: Thompson, W. (ed.) Gaia: A Way of Knowing. Political Implications of the New Biology, pp. 48–64. Lindisfarne Press, Hudson (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Parthemore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Parthemore, J. (2014). From a Sensorimotor to a Sensorimotor++ Account of Embodied Conceptual Cognition. In: Bishop, J., Martin, A. (eds) Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05106-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05107-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics