Advertisement

Three Scanning Methods for Text Cursor Manipulation

  • A. J. SporkaEmail author
  • O. Polacek
  • J. Murin
Conference paper

Abstract

The set of keys dedicated solely to cursor movement control evolved over decades. A standard PC has four arrow keys: Home, End, Page Up and Page Down whose function is well-known to the vast majority of computer users. Jumping to the beginning or end of the document or moving left or right by one word is usually possible using the Control key as a modifier. By repeated pressing of these keys, the users may carry out various cursor movement tasks.

Keywords

Scanning Method Step Scanning Movement Unit Cursor Movement Scanning Interval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by project TextAble (H12070; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.)

References

  1. Baljko M, Tam A (2006) Indirect text entry using one or two keys. In: Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, Portland, USGoogle Scholar
  2. Felzer T, Nordmann R (2006) Speeding up hands-free text entry. In: Proceedings of CWUAAT’06, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Felzer T, Rinderknecht S (2009) 3dScan: an environment control system supporting persons with severe motor impairments. In: Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, Pittsburgh, PA, USGoogle Scholar
  4. Felzer T, Strah B, Nordmann R (2008) Automatic and self-paced scanning for alternative text entry. In: Proceedings of the IASTED international conference on telehealth/assistive technologies, Baltimore, MD, USGoogle Scholar
  5. Harbusch K, Kühn M (2003) An evaluation study of two-button scanning with ambiguous keyboards. In: Proceedings of AAATE’03Google Scholar
  6. Koester HH, Levine SP (1994) Learning and performance of able-bodied individuals using scanning systems with and without word prediction. Assist Technol 6(1):42–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin YL, Wu TF, Chen MC, Yeh YM, Wang HP (2008) Designing a scanning on-screen keyboard for people with severe motor disabilities. In: Miesenberger K, Klaus J, Zagler W, Karshmer A (eds) Computers helping people with special needs, LNCS, vol 5105. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. Mackenzie IS, Felzer T (2010) SAK: scanning ambiguous keyboard for efficient one-key text entry. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 17(3):11:1–11:39Google Scholar
  9. Miro-Borras J, Bernabeu-Soler P (2008) E-everything for all: Text entry for people with severe motor disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 6th CollECTeRGoogle Scholar
  10. Polacek O, Míkovec Z, Slavik P (2012) Predictive scanning keyboard operated by hissing. In: Proceedings of the AT’12, IASTEDGoogle Scholar
  11. Schadle I (2004) Sibyl: AAC system using NLP techniques. In: Miesenberger K, Klaus J, Zagler W, Burger D (eds) Computers helping people with special needs, LNCS, vol 3118. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. Wandmacher T, Antoine JY, Poirier F, Départe JP (2008) Sibylle, an assistive communication system adapting to the context and its user. ACM Trans Access Comput 1(1): 6:1–6:30Google Scholar
  13. Whiteside J, Archer N, Wixon D, Good M (1982) How do people really use text editors? ACM SIGOA Newslett 3(1–2):29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Graphics and Interaction, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringCzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations