Skip to main content

Managing Cross-Industry Innovations: A Search Strategy for Radical Eco-innovations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eco-Innovation and the Development of Business Models

Part of the book series: Greening of Industry Networks Studies ((GINS,volume 2))

  • 1633 Accesses

Abstract

Companies can enhance their internal knowledge and develop innovations by working together with external partners from their own value chain. Besides this common open innovation strategy, the cooperation with partners from distant industries is becoming ever more important for companies as this concept can be a significant source for radical eco-innovations. These cross-industry innovations (CII) can lead to lower development time, lower project risks, and higher growth rates and margins owing to the discovery of radical innovations. We have found that due to a lack of existing process models and methods, companies implement cross-industry innovation strategies – in the most part – unsystematically and that the TRIZ database approach, the knowledge broker approach, and a creativity workshop with external experts and lead users are the most appropriate methods to creating cross-industry eco-innovations. The contribution of this chapter is, firstly, to analyze why the cross-industry innovation framework can have significant influence on the creation of radical eco-innovations and, secondly, to present a step-by-step process which should help companies – and especially innovation managers – to systematically implement eco-innovations across industries in the fuzzy front end of the innovation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, eco-products in the area of air pollution prevention, water quality control, material recycling and energy efficiency improvements are well established and have reached advanced technological levels.

  2. 2.

    For example, Brunswicker and Hutschek (2010).

  3. 3.

    The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) defines LCA (life cycle assessment) as a “compilation and evaluation of inputs, outputs, and the potential environmental impacts of a product throughout its life cycle” (ISO 14040 2006).

  4. 4.

    An example for contradictions is a zero waste emission process.

References

  • Altshuller G (1984) Creativity as an exact science. The theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MM (2008) Eco-innovation – towards a taxonomy and theory. Paper to be presented at the 25th DRUID celebration conference 2008 entrepreneurship and innovation – organizations, institutions, systems and regions, Copenhagen, 17–20 June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch HG, Rabinowitz HJ (1951) The negative effect of previous experience on productive thinking. J Exp Psychol 47(2):121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunswicker S, Hutschek U (2010) Crossing horizons: leveraging cross-industry innovations search in the front-end of the innovation process. Int J Manage 14(4):683–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge S (2009) The systems engineering tool box. http://www.burgehugheswalsh.co.uk/uploaded/documents/FM-Tool-Box-V1.0.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2013

  • Chen JL, Chen W-C (2007) TRIZ based eco-innovation in design for active disassembly. In: Takata S, Umeda S (ed) Advances in life cycle engineering for sustainable manufacturing businesses. Proceedings of the 14th CIRP conference on life cycle engineering. Waseda University, Tokyo, Springer, pp 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JL, Liu C–C (2001) An eco-innovative design approach incorporating the TRIZ method without contradiction analysis. J Sustain Prod Des 1:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (2006a) Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (2006b) Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Chesbrough HW, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J Mark Res 34(1):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIO – Eco-Innovation Observatory (2011) The eco-innovation challenge: pathways to a resource-efficient Europe. The way to a green economy through eco-innovation. In: O’Brien M et al (ed) Annual report 2010, DG Environment, Brussels. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1308928736_eco_report_2011.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2013

  • EIO – Eco-Innovation Observatory (2013) Europe in transition. Paving the way to a green economy through eco-innovation. Annual report 2012, Meghan O’Brien/Michal Miedzinski, Eds. Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A6-2005-0141&language=EN. Accessed 29 May 2013

  • Enkel E, Dürmüller C (2011) Cross-industry-innovation: Der Blick über den Gartenzaun. In: Gassmann O, Sutter P (eds) Praxiswissen innovations management. Von der Idee zum Markterfolg. Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich, pp 215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E, Gassmann O (2010) Creative imitation. Exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Manage 40:256–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E, Horvàth A (2010) Mit Cross-Industry-Innovation zu radikalen Neuerungen. In: Ili S (ed) Open Innovation umsetzen. Prozesse, Methoden, Systeme, Kultur. Symposion Publishing, Düsseldorf, pp 293–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertl M (2010) Strategiebildung für die Umsetzung von Open Innovation. In: Ili S (ed) Open Innovation umsetzen. Prozesse, Methoden, Systeme, Kultur. Symposion Publishing, Düsseldorf, pp 61–84

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004) Stimulating technologies for sustainable development: an environmental technologies action plan for the European Union. (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament), COM (2004) 38 final, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (2006) Eco-innovation indicators. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O (2006) Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Manage 36(3):223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Enkel E (2004) Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. R&D management conference (RADMA). Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Zeschky M (2008) Opening up the solution space: the role of analogical thinking for breakthrough product innovation. Creat Innov Manage 17:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Zeschky M, Wolff T, Stahl M (2010) Crossing the industry line: breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with‚ non-suppliers’. Long Range Plann 43:639–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geschka H, Moger S, Rickards T (1994) Creativity and innovation: the power of synergy. Geschka & Partner, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjoksi N (2011) Resource policies and the innovation dimension. European Sustainable Development Network, ESDN Case Study No. 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon A (2002) Brokering knowledge: linking learning and innovation. Res Organ Behav 24:41–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill B (1999) Naturorientierte Lösungsfindung: Entwickeln und Konstruieren von biologischen Vorbildern. Expert-Verlag, Renningen-Malmsheim

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E, Harrison D (2000) Investigating the use of TRIZ in eco-innovation. TRIZ Journal, September. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2000/09/b/default.asp

  • Jones E, Darell M, Harrison D, Stanton N (2001) An eco-innovation case study of domestic dishwashing through the application of TRIZ tools. Creat Innov Manage 10(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalogerakis K, Herstatt C, Lüthje C (2005) Generating innovations through analogies. An empirical investigation of knowledge brokers. Working paper 33. Hamburg-Harburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Pearson P (2007) Measuring eco-innovation. Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. Project No. 044513. http://www.oecd.org/env/consumption-innovation/43960830.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2013

  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg Manage J 27(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister JM et al (2010) Theses about managing open innovation processes. In: Jacobsen H, Schallock B (eds) Innovationsstrategien jenseits traditionellen Managements. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 200–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U (2011) Open innovation: past research, current debates, and future directions. Acad Manage Perspect 25(1):75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak A, Cooper LP, Neece OE (2004) Knowledge reuse for innovation. Manage Sci 50(2):174–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann D (n.d.) TRIZ: an introduction. Systematic Innovation Ltd. http://www.systematic-innovation.com/Articles/02,%2003,%2004/July04-TRIZ-%20AN%20INTRODUCTION.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2013

  • Mann D, Dewulf S (n.d.) Updating the contradiction matrix. http://www.systematic-innovation.com/Articles/02,%2003,%2004/Jan03-Updating%20the%20Contradiction%20Matrix.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2013

  • Nooteboom R et al (2007) Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Res Policy 36:1016–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuij R (2001) Eco-innovation helped or hindered by integrated product policy. J Sustain Prod Des 1:49–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Fostering innovation for green growth, Green growth studies. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, European Commission & Nordic Innovation Joint Network (2012) The future of eco-innovation: the role of business models in green transformation. OECD background paper

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/Eurostat (1999) The environmental goods and services industry. Manual for data collection and analysis. OECD Publications Service, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/Eurostat (2005) Oslo manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edn. OECD/Eurostat, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari D (2004) Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation xx:1–10. http://www.sciencedirect.com. Accessed 28 May 2013

  • Reichwald R, Piller F (2006) Interaktive Wertschöpfung: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schild K, Herstatt C, Lüthje C (2004) How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations. Working paper 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling A et al (2009) Transformative innovation. A report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. University of Sussex, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stötzel M, Wiener M, Amberg M (2011) Key differentiators of open innovation platforms – a market-oriented perspective. Wirtschaftsinformatik proceeding. Paper 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Terninko J, Zusman A, Zlotin B (1998) Systematic innovation: an introduction to TRIZ (theory of inventive problem solving). St Lucie Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E (1988) The source of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker E, Lovins AB, Lovins LH (1999) Factor four: doubling wealth – halving resource use. Earthscan Publications Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD – World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2000) Eco-efficiency. Creating more value with less impact. http://www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/eco_efficiency_creating_more_value.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2013

  • Wheelwright S, Clark K (1992) Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Kloiber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kloiber, M., Priewasser, R. (2014). Managing Cross-Industry Innovations: A Search Strategy for Radical Eco-innovations. In: Azevedo, S., Brandenburg, M., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V. (eds) Eco-Innovation and the Development of Business Models. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05077-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics