Advertisement

Conservation of Energy: An Analytical Tool for Student Accounts of Carbon-Transforming Processes

  • Jenny M. DauerEmail author
  • Hannah K. Miller
  • Charles W. (Andy) Anderson
Chapter

Abstract

Energy and energy conservation are powerful concepts for understanding biological systems, but helping students use these concepts as tools for analysis of these complex systems poses special challenges. This chapter focuses on three issues that arise in teaching about energy in biological systems:
  1. 1.

    Understanding the purpose of the concept of energy. Students often use energy in cause-effect stories related to vitality or animation (“energy is what makes things happen”), rather than treating energy as an enduring entity that can be used as a tool for analysis. In instruction, we treat the principles of energy conservation as “rules to be followed.” Students use these rules to trace energy through processes and observe how energy constrains these processes.

     
  2. 2.

    Identifying forms of energy in living systems. Students often associate energy with cause, vitality, or growth in ways that do not align with scientific conceptions of energy. In our instruction, we make simplifications we feel are important for helping students develop a working discourse about energy in science classrooms: we describe energy in different forms, one of which is chemical energy that is associated with bonds of molecules.

     
  3. 3.

    Tracing energy separately from matter. Students often lack a sense of necessity for distinguishing between matter and energy (“glucose is energy”). We use physical representations of energy (twist ties) and a framework for scaffolding distinct accounts of matter and energy to help students focus on explaining matter and energy as separate entities.

     

Keywords

Chemical Energy Living System Physical Context Learning Progression Bromothymol Blue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: Achieve, Inc. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
  2. Cooper, M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2013). The trouble with chemical energy: Why understanding bond energies requires an interdisciplinary systems approach. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 306–312.Google Scholar
  3. Feynman, R., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol. I, chpt 4.1). California Institute of Technology. www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu
  4. Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). Learning progressions for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1149–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee, H., & Liu, O. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Nordine, J., Krajcik, J., & Fortus, D. (2011). Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support integrated understanding and future learning. Science Education, 95(4), 670–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rice, J., Doherty, J. H., & Anderson, C. W. (2014). Principles, first and foremost: A tool for understanding biological processes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(3), 74–82.Google Scholar
  10. Trumper, R. (1990). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept – Part one. International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Trumper, R. (1993). Children’s energy concepts: A cross-age study. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Watts, M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenny M. Dauer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hannah K. Miller
    • 2
  • Charles W. (Andy) Anderson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Nebraska – Lincoln School of Natural ResourcesLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Teacher EducationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations