Abstract
Energy and energy conservation are powerful concepts for understanding biological systems, but helping students use these concepts as tools for analysis of these complex systems poses special challenges. This chapter focuses on three issues that arise in teaching about energy in biological systems:
-
1.
Understanding the purpose of the concept of energy. Students often use energy in cause-effect stories related to vitality or animation (“energy is what makes things happen”), rather than treating energy as an enduring entity that can be used as a tool for analysis. In instruction, we treat the principles of energy conservation as “rules to be followed.” Students use these rules to trace energy through processes and observe how energy constrains these processes.
-
2.
Identifying forms of energy in living systems. Students often associate energy with cause, vitality, or growth in ways that do not align with scientific conceptions of energy. In our instruction, we make simplifications we feel are important for helping students develop a working discourse about energy in science classrooms: we describe energy in different forms, one of which is chemical energy that is associated with bonds of molecules.
-
3.
Tracing energy separately from matter. Students often lack a sense of necessity for distinguishing between matter and energy (“glucose is energy”). We use physical representations of energy (twist ties) and a framework for scaffolding distinct accounts of matter and energy to help students focus on explaining matter and energy as separate entities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: Achieve, Inc. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
Cooper, M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2013). The trouble with chemical energy: Why understanding bond energies requires an interdisciplinary systems approach. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 306–312.
Feynman, R., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol. I, chpt 4.1). California Institute of Technology. www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu
Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). Learning progressions for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1149–1180.
Lee, H., & Liu, O. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665–688.
Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nordine, J., Krajcik, J., & Fortus, D. (2011). Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support integrated understanding and future learning. Science Education, 95(4), 670–699.
Rice, J., Doherty, J. H., & Anderson, C. W. (2014). Principles, first and foremost: A tool for understanding biological processes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(3), 74–82.
Trumper, R. (1990). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept – Part one. International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 343–354.
Trumper, R. (1993). Children’s energy concepts: A cross-age study. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 139–148.
Watts, M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213–217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dauer, J.M., Miller, H.K., Anderson, C.W.(. (2014). Conservation of Energy: An Analytical Tool for Student Accounts of Carbon-Transforming Processes. In: Chen, R., et al. Teaching and Learning of Energy in K – 12 Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05016-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05017-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)