Abstract
This chapter discusses the concept of energy as viewed from the perspective of a particle physicist and discusses implications for the teaching of energy. A major conclusion is that there are many ways the term energy is used across the disciplines, and students cannot be expected to make connections between them if they are not aided to do so by explicit discussion of the relationships and differences between the usages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
“…in physics today we have no notion of what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is not that way.” (Feynman et al. 2011, pp. 4–1).
References
Adrian, B., & Fuller, R. (1997). A qualitative investigation of college students’ conceptions of electric fields. Paper presented at joint meeting of the Arkansas-Oklahoma-Kansas and Nebraska AAPT Sections, Manhattan, KS. Retrieved June 17, 2013, from http://physics.unl.edu/~rpeg/Electric_fields.pdf.
Bodzin, A. M. (2011, April 3–6). What do eighth grade students know about energy resources? Paper presented at the NARST 2011 annual international conference in Orlando, FL, USA.
Boo, H. K. (1998). Students’ understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 569–581. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199805)35:5<569::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-N.
Boo, H. K., & Watson, J. R. (2001). Progression in high school students’ (aged 16–18) conceptualizations about chemical reactions in solution. Science Education, 85, 568–585.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Coopersmith, M. (2010). Energy – The subtle concept. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Driver, R., & Warrington, L. (1985). Students’ use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situations. Physics Education, 20, 171–176.
Duit, R. (1981). Students’ notions about the energy concept – Before and after physics instruction. In W. Jung, H. Pfundt, & C. von Rhoeneck (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop on ‘problems concerning students’ representation of Physics and Chemistry knowledge (pp. 268–319). Ludwigsburg: Paedagogische Hochschule.
Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school – Empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19, 59–66.
Duit, R. (1987). Should energy be introduced as something quasi-material? International Journal of Science Education, 9, 139–145.
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (2011). Feynman lectures on physics 1: Mainly mechanics, radiation, and heat. New York: Basic Books.
Gilbert, J. K., & Osborne, R. J. (1980). Some problems of learning science. School Science Review, 61, 664–674.
Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics – An interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 85–106. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300107.
Libarkin, J. C., Asghar, A., Crockett, C., & Sadler, P. (2011). Invisible misconceptions: Student understanding of ultraviolet and infrared radiation. Astronomy Education Review, 10, 010105–1. doi:10.3847/AER2011022.
Lijnse, P. L. (1990). Energy between the life-world of pupils and the world of physics. Science Education, 74(5), 571–583.
Liu, X., & McKeough, A. (2005). Developmental growth in students’ concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493–517.
Maskill, R., & Pedrosa de Jesus, H. (1997). Pupils’ questions, alternative frameworks and the design of science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 781–799.
Millar, R. (1994). Students’ understanding of key ideas radioactivity and ionizing radiation. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 53–70.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 162–188. doi:10.1002/tea.21061.
Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. P. (2011). A philosophically informed teaching proposal on the topic of energy for students aged 11–14. Science & Education, 20(10), 961–979.
Solomon, J. (1983). Messy, contradictory and obstinately persistent: A study of children’s out-of-school ideas about energy. School Science Review, 65(231), 225–230.
Stephanik, B. M., & Shaffer, P. S. (2011). Examining student ability to interpret and use potential energy diagrams for classical systems. arXiv:1109.2074 [physics.ed-ph].
Stocklmayer, S. M., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Images of electricity: How do novices and experts model electric current? International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 163–178.
Trumper, R. (1990). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept. Part I. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 343–354.
Warren, J. W. (1983). Energy and its carriers: A critical analysis. Physics Education, 18, 209–212.
Acknowledgement
I acknowledge helpful comments from David Hammer and Joseph Krajcik that have influenced the final form of this article. I also acknowledge the careful editorial work of David Fortus, Knut Neumann, and Allison Scheff who have much improved the clarity and added some needed references to a literature that I do not know well.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quinn, H.R. (2014). A Physicist’s Musings on Teaching About Energy. In: Chen, R., et al. Teaching and Learning of Energy in K – 12 Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05016-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05017-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)