Open image in new windowIntroduction: Thematic and Regional Networks on Landslides
This is a short introduction to Part II of this volume which includes background information about establishment of regional and thematic networks by the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL) and summarized overview of nine ICL networks established in the period 2012–2013, as well as contributions from WLF3 Session A2. Papers included in this part of the volume represent the most important activities of the following networks: ICL Latin America Network (ICLLAN), South-East Asian Network for Landslide Risk Management, ICL Adriatic-Balkan Network (ICL ABN) and ICL thematic network on Landslide Monitoring and Warning (ICL LaMaWaTheN).
KeywordsWLF3 ICL regional networks ICL thematic networks ICLLAN ICL ABN ICL LaMaWaTheN
The conveners of the A2 Session would like to thank all the reviewers who have reviewed the papers submitted to this Session. The papers in the Session are significantly improved through mindful editing conducted by Eileen McSaveney, Lynn Highland and Mauri McSaveney. Their editorial work is highly appreciated.
- Alcántara-Ayala I, Carreño R, Ávila G, Godoy A (2014) The ICL Latin American Network (ICLLAN): past activities and challenges ahead. In: Sassa K et al (eds) Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, Vol 1. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 181–185Google Scholar
- Arambepola NMSI (2014) A South-East Asian Network for landslide risk management for regional collaboration. In: Sassa K et al (eds) Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, Vol 1. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 187–191Google Scholar
- Arbanas Ž, Mihalić Arbanas S, Vivoda M, Martinović K, Bernat S (2014) Landslide knowledge exchange through the regional cooperation in the Adriatic-Balkan region. In: Sassa K et al (eds) Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, Vol 1. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 199–205Google Scholar
- Maček M, Petkovšek A, Majes B, Mikoš M (2014) Landslide monitoring techniques database. In: Sassa K et al (eds) Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, Vol 1. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 193–197Google Scholar