Abstract
Amid a vast array of variations in language, culture, and educational traditions, some commonalities pertain to school mathematics across the globe. One is the centrality of textbooks to school mathematics teaching and learning. Mathematics textbooks vary greatly across countries and grade levels in their organization and display of content and the support provided to students or to teachers. Moreover, the historical trajectories of curriculum development reflected in textbooks develop in ways that reflect varying influences across countries (Jones 1970; Stanic and Kilpatrick 1992). Yet their pivotal importance to classroom instruction in almost all settings of compulsory schooling in the world is undeniable. They serve both as teaching/learning tools and as tangible representations of expectations for mathematics instruction in the educational context in which they are used.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brownell, W. A., & Moser, H. E. (1949). Meaningful vs. mechanical learning: A study in grade III subtraction (Duke University Research Studies in Education, No. 8). Durham: Duke University Press.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.
Fawcett, H. P. (1938). The nature of proof: A description and evaluation of certain procedures used in a senior high school to develop an understanding of the nature of proof. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (Eds.). (1999). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York: Macmillan.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., et al. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.
Jones, P. S. (Ed.). (1970). A history of mathematics education in the United States and Canada (32nd Yearbook). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Newmann, F. M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2005). On learning environments that foster subject-matter competence. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, G. Kanselaar, & M. Valcke (Eds.), Powerful environments for promoting deep conceptual and strategic learning (pp. 29–44). Leuven: Studia Paedagogica.
Silver, E. A., & Lane, S. (1995). Can instructional reform in urban middle schools help students narrow the mathematics performance gap? Some evidence from the QUASAR project. Research in Middle Level Education, 18(2), 49–70.
Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80.
Stanic, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (1992). Mathematics curriculum reform in the United States: A historical perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 407–417.
Travers, K. J., & Westbury, I. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics I: Analysis of mathematics curricula. New York: Pergamon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silver, E.A. (2014). Preface to Part II. In: Li, Y., Silver, E., Li, S. (eds) Transforming Mathematics Instruction. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04992-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04993-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)