Abstract
This chapter addresses theory in relation to mathematics teaching and learning development, drawing on a research study to exemplify theoretical perspectives. In particular it addresses difficulties and issues which arise in a developmental process, from both theoretical and practice-based points of view. The areas of theory are those of inquiry, community and critical alignment, which address developmental processes in mathematics learning and teaching; documentational genesis and instrumentation theory, which address the development of knowledge in teaching; and finally the use of a framework from activity theory, which addresses issues and tensions that emerge from observation and analysis in the research. The illustrative research study addresses perceptions of learning and its outcomes between a teaching team and a cohort of engineering students learning mathematics in a university system. Overall the chapter seeks to address complexity in the developmental process and important synergies between theory, practice and research.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Relevant here is a special issue of the journal ZDM (ZDM, Vol. 4, Issue 5) which focuses on the didactical triangle of teacher, student and mathematics and important relations between mathematics teaching and learning.
- 2.
Space here has not allowed a dual focus on the development of teaching at both school and university levels. Developmental research at school level focusing on inquiry approaches to developing teaching, used by teachers and didacticians, with activity theory analyses can be found in Jaworski and Goodchild (2006) and Jaworski (2008a).
- 3.
HE STEM has been a major government-sponsored programme in higher education focusing on the subjects science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Funding has been available for projects promoting teaching and learning development within this programme.
- 4.
A level GCE (Advanced Level General Certificate of Education) is a national examination (at 16+) with high stakes outcomes for higher-level study. Many UK universities require the highest grade in A level to qualify for university study in mathematics.
References
Artigue, M., Batanero, C., & Kent, P. (2007). Mathematics thinking and learning at post secondary level. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Bassey, M. (1995). Creating education through research. Edinburgh: British Educational Research Association.
Brown, M. (1979). Cognitive development in the learning of mathematics. In A. Floyd (Ed.), Cognitive development in the school years. London: Croom Helm.
Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Cochran Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities’. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 249–305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 167–180.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2011a). Mathematics teacher education advanced methods: An example in dynamic geometry. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 399–411.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2011b). Communities, documents and professional geneses: Interrelated stories. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum material and teacher development. New York: Springer.
Hawkes, T., & Savage, M. (Eds.). (2000). Measuring the mathematics problem. London: The Engineering Council.
Hernandez-Martinez, P., Williams, J., Black, L., Pampala, M., & Wake, G. (2011). Students’ views on their transition from school to college mathematics: Rethinking ‘transition’ as an issue of identity. Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 119–130.
Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnerships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(2–3), 249–282.
Jaworski, B. (2004a). Insiders and outsiders in mathematics teaching development: The design and study of classroom activity. Research in Mathematics Education, 6, 3–22.
Jaworski, B. (2004b). Grappling with complexity: Co-learning in inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 17–32). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 187–211.
Jaworski, B. (2008a). Building and sustaining inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development: Teachers and didacticians in collaboration. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Volume 3 of the International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 309–330). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Jaworski, B. (2008b). Helping engineers learn mathematics: A developmental research approach. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 27(3), 160–166.
Jaworski, B. (in press). Mathematical meaning-making and its relation to design of teaching. In Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Jaworski, B., & Goodchild, S. (2006). Inquiry community in an activity theory frame. In J. Novotná, H. Morová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3353–3360). Prague: Charles University Prague.
Jaworski, B., & Matthews, J. (2011). Developing teaching of mathematics to first year engineering students. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 30(4), 178–185.
Jaworski, B., Robinson, C., Matthews, J., & Croft, A. C. (2012). Issues in teaching mathematics to engineering students to promote conceptual understanding: A study of the use of GeoGebra and inquiry-based tasks. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 19(4), 147–152.
Kelly, A. E. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. London: Addison Wesley.
Nardi, E. (2008). Amongst mathematicians: Teaching and learning mathematics at university level. London: Springer.
Pilzer, S., Robinson, M., Lomen, D., Flath, D., Hughes Hallet, D., Lahme, B., Morris, J., Mccallum, W., & Thrash, J. (2003). Conceptests to accompany calculus (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of education. London: Continuum.
Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. A. (1986). Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 850–873). New York: Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic.
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Stenhouse, L. (1984). Evaluating curriculum evaluation. In C. Adelman (Ed.), The politics and ethics of evaluation. London: Croom Helm.
The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2012). Enhancing engineering in higher education: Outputs of the National HE STEM Programme. London: Author.
Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Handheld technology for mathematics education: Flashback into the future. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 667–681.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgement
I would like to acknowledge the contributions of Janette Matthews, Carol Robinson and Tony Croft, without whom the examples from research would not have been possible. I also thank two anonymous reviewers for their insights which helped me address important issues in an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaworski, B. (2014). Unifying Complexity in Mathematics Teaching-Learning Development: A Theory-Practice Dialectic. In: Li, Y., Silver, E., Li, S. (eds) Transforming Mathematics Instruction. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04992-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04993-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)