Abstract
This chapter intends to illustrate and discuss one developmental project in the context of basic education curriculum changes concerning the early introduction of algebraic thinking on classroom instruction in one fourth grade class. From a more general point of view, this discussion centers on the relationship between the official, planned, enacted, and learned curriculum. Different aspects of these dimensions of the curriculum are exemplified from the analysis of some mathematical tasks and instances of the mathematical communication processes that took place in the classroom throughout one school year.
The progress made by the students reveals that the curricular guidelines have several characteristics that altogether contribute to accomplish the general curriculum goal of students’ algebraic thinking development: conceiving early algebra as the development of a way of thinking that links arithmetic to algebra, underlying the need to work with valuable mathematical tasks in the classroom, and fostering the students’ mathematical communication. However, we contend that the learned curriculum was possible by the project characteristics, where the enacted curriculum reflects the specificity of the class we have been working with.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Blanton, M. L. (2008). Algebra and the elementary classroom. Transforming thinking, transforming practice. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446.
Britt, M. S., & Irwin, K. C. (2011). Algebraic thinking with or without algebraic representation: A pathway for learning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 137–159). New York: Springer.
Cai, J., Ng, F. S., & Moyer, J. (2011). Developing students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades: Lessons from China and Singapore. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 21–41). New York: Springer.
Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 3–22.
Dörfler, W. (2008). En route from patterns to algebra: Comments and reflections. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 143–160.
Ellis, A. B. (2007). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 221–262.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). From convergence to divergence: The development of mathematical problem solving in research, curriculum, and classroom practice in Singapore. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 491–501.
Fujii, T. (2003). Probing students’ understanding of variables through cognitive conflict problems: Is the concept of a variable so difficult for students to understand? In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 49–65). Honolulu: PME.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 45–85). London: Routledge.
Hirsch, C. R., & Reys, B. J. (2009). Mathematics curriculum: A vehicle for school improvement. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 749–761.
Kaput, J., Carraher, D. W., & Blanton, M. L. (Eds.). (2008). Algebra in the early grades (pp. xvii–xxi). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates & NCTM.
Kulm, G., & Li, Y. (2009). Curriculum research to improve teaching and learning: National and cross-national studies. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 709–715.
Lloyd, G. M. (2009). School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers’ learning: Future elementary teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 763–775.
Lloyd, G. M., Remillard, J. T., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum materials: An emerging field. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 3–14). New York: Routledge.
Mason, J., Stephens, M., & Watson, J. (2009). Appreciating mathematical structure for all. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 10–32.
Mestre, C., & Oliveira, H. (2012). From quasi-variable thinking to algebraic thinking: A study with grade four students. In Pre-proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 2091–2098). Seoul: ICMI.
Ministério da Educação – ME. (2007). Programa de Matemática do Ensino Básico [Mathematics curriculum for basic education]. Lisboa: DGIDC.
Moss, J., Beaty, R., McNab, S. L., & Eisenband, J. (2005). The potential of geometric sequences to foster young students’ ability to generalize in Mathematics. http://www.brookings.edu/gs/brown/algebraicreasoning.htm
Murray, M. K. (2010). Early algebra and mathematics specialists. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 12, 73–81.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Oliveira, H. (2009). Understanding the teacher’s role in supporting students’ generalization when investigating sequences. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Matematica), 19(Supplemento 4), 133–143.
Ponte, J. P. (2012). A practice-oriented professional development programme to support the introduction of a new mathematics curriculum in Portugal. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(4), 317–327.
Ponte, J. P., Segurado, I., & Oliveira, H. (2003). A collaborative project using narratives: What happens when pupils work on mathematical investigations? In A. Peter-Koop, V. Santos-Wagner, C. Breen, & A. Begg (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education (pp. 85–97). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ponte, J. P., Branco, N., & Matos, A. (2009). Álgebra no Ensino Básico [Algebra in basic education]. Lisboa: ME-DGIDC.
Remillard, J., & Heck, D. (2010) Influences on the enacted curriculum. Conference presented at the CSMC Research Associates. Accessed from http://mathcurriculumcenter.org/PDFS/RemillardHeck.pdf
Russell, S., Schifter, D., & Bastable, V. (2011). Developing algebraic thinking in the context of arithmetic. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 43–69). New York: Springer.
Silver, E. A. (2009). Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: What might we learn? ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 827–832.
Stephens, M., & Wang, X. (2008). Investigating some junctures in relational thinking: A study of year 6 and year 7 students from Australia and China. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 28–39.
Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2005). Young children’s ability to use the balance strategy to solve for unknowns. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(1), 58–72.
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 51–85). New York: Cambridge University Press. Accessed from https://www.csun.edu/~SB4310/601%20files/dialogicinquiry.pdf
Zembat, I. O. (2010). A micro-curricular analysis of unified mathematics curricula in Turkey. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 443–455.
Ziebarth, S., Hart, E. W., Marcus, R., Ritsema, B., Schoen, H. L., & Walker, R. (2009). High school teachers as negotiators between curriculum intentions and enactment: The dynamics of mathematics curriculum development. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 171–189). New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia – in the frame of the Project Professional Practices of Mathematics Teachers (contract PTDC/CPE-CED/098931/2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliveira, H., Mestre, C. (2014). Opportunities to Develop Algebraic Thinking in Elementary Grades Throughout the School Year in the Context of Mathematics Curriculum Changes. In: Li, Y., Silver, E., Li, S. (eds) Transforming Mathematics Instruction. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04992-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04993-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)