Skip to main content

Craniotomy Without Flap Replacement for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms to Reduce Ischemic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Safety and Feasibility Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neurovascular Events After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 120))

Abstract

Background: Cortical and subcortical brain ischemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains a central challenge in improving patient outcome. Generally the bone flap is replaced after surgical clipping and no decompression is practiced in endovascularly treated patients. The aim of this preliminary safety and feasibility study is to clarify whether a first-line decompression would improve brain perfusion and salvage more tissue at risk in patients who developed delayed vasospasm. In addition, we assessed whether the risks involved with a second surgery to replace the bone flap would affect patient outcome.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with aSAH who underwent surgical clipping and developed cerebral vasospasm from 2009 to 2012 at our institution. We selected cases where the bone flap was not replaced at initial surgery and needed a second procedure for bone flap replacement. Primary end points were new delayed ischemic neurological deficits (DINDs), the extent of brain infarctions, and patient functional outcome. Secondary end points were hazards of the second procedure for bone replacement.

Results: We identified six patients in whom the surgeon chose not to replace the bone flap. In four patients, this was a pterional bone flap (standard), and in two patients it was a larger frontotemporoparietal flap. Despite the limited extent of the craniotomy, only one patient (16 %) required additional decompression. Two patients (33%) developed DINDs and five patients (83 %) showed delayed cerebral infarctions on computed tomography. Of those, three patients showed good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score >4 and modified Rankin Scale score <3). No complications or new neurological deficits occurred during the second surgery for bone replacement.

Conclusions: To date, no standardized criteria exist to decide whether the bone flap should be removed or replaced at initial surgery. Our single-center experience in a limited number of patients reveals a pattern with respect to initial clinical parameters and imaging findings that might be a first step in developing standardized decision parameters. This may prevent secondary surgery for decompression in deleterious conditions during the vasospasm phase. Based on these findings, we have developed a protocol for a prospective study that will further investigate the benefits of this management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arikan F, Vilalta J, Romero FJ, Porta I, Martinez-Ricarte FR, Sahuquillo J (2010) Primary decompressive craniectomy in patients with aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results of a pilot study in 11 cases. Neurocirugia (Astur) 21:452–460

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailes JE, Spetzler RF, Hadley MN, Baldwin HZ (1990) Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg 72:559–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Tomsick T, Barsan W, Spilker J (1990) Ultra-early evaluation of intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 72:195–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buschmann U, Yonekawa Y, Fortunati M, Cesnulis E, Keller E (2007) Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and intractable intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149:59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Ambrosio AL, Sughrue ME, Yorgason JG, Mocco JD, Kreiter KT, Mayer SA, McKhann GM II, Connolly ES Jr (2005) Decompressive hemicraniectomy for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with associated intracerebral hemorrhage: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment. Neurosurgery 56:12–19; discussion 19–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Rooij NK, Linn FH, van der Plas JA, Algra A, Rinkel GJ (2007) Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78:1365–1372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorfer C, Frick A, Knosp E, Gruber A (2010) Decompressive hemicraniectomy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 74:465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fandino J, Taussky P, Marbacher S, Muroi C, Diepers M, Fathi AR, Remonda L (2013) The concept of a hybrid operating room: applications in cerebrovascular surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 115:113–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haley EC Jr, Kassell NF, Torner JC (1992) The International Cooperative Study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. The North American experience. Stroke 23:205–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaeger M, Soehle M, Meixensberger J (2003) Effects of decompressive craniectomy on brain tissue oxygen in patients with intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:513–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Jane JA, Haley EC Jr, Adams HP (1990) The International Cooperative Study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 2: Surgical results. J Neurosurg 73:37–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schirmer CM, Hoit DA, Malek AM (2007) Decompressive hemicraniectomy for the treatment of intractable intracranial hypertension after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 38:987–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith ER, Carter BS, Ogilvy CS (2002) Proposed use of prophylactic decompressive craniectomy in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients presenting with associated large sylvian hematomas. Neurosurgery 51:117–124; discussion 124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. TISoUIA I (1998) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms – risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med 339:1725–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali-Reza Fathi MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Soleman, J., Schatlo, B., Dan-Ura, H., Remonda, L., Fandino, J., Fathi, AR. (2015). Craniotomy Without Flap Replacement for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms to Reduce Ischemic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Safety and Feasibility Analysis. In: Fandino, J., Marbacher, S., Fathi, AR., Muroi, C., Keller, E. (eds) Neurovascular Events After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 120. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04980-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04981-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics