Advertisement

Building a Virtual World for Team Work Improvement

  • Heide Lukosch
  • Bas van Nuland
  • Theo van Ruijven
  • Linda van Veen
  • Alexander Verbraeck
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8264)

Abstract

Many working tasks in our complex, fast changing world are no longer to be solved by single workers, but require effective cooperation of a team of workers. Communication, cooperation and participation are basic skills needed for a well functioning team, especially in safety-critical domains like security. In these domains, the ability of a team to cooperate sometimes even decides about life and death. The development of a shared understanding of a given situation is a prerequisite for effective teamwork. Traditional methods of enhancing teamwork related skills are limited due to their lack of flexibility and their distance to real world challenges. In more general terms, rapidly changing environments require emerging and creative strategies and tools. Our research aims at exploring whether and how such a creative tool, namely a simulation game, can be used as a socio-technological system to support shared situational awareness. Results from usability tests of various game scenarios show that realistic virtual environments imply the ability to foster teamwork related skills like situational awareness and communication.

Keywords

Virtual Environment Virtual World Situational Awareness Realistic Virtual Environment Virtual Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Klabbers, J.H.G.: The Magic Circle: Principles of Gaming & Simulation. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kriz, W.: Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations through Gaming Simulation Design. Simulation&Gaming 34, 495–510 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sitzmann, T.: A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology 64, 489–528 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malone, T.W.: What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Pipeline 6(2), 50–51 (1981)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chalmers, A., Debattista, K.: Level of Realism for Serious Games. In: IEEE Proceedings of 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lehman, D.R., Lempert, R.O., Nisbett, R.E.: The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. American Psychologist 43, 431–442 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Macedonia, M.: Games Soldiers Play. IEEE Spectrum, 32-37 (March 2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonk, C.J., Dennen, V.P.: Massive Multiplayer Online Gaming: A Research Framework for Military Training and Education, Technical Report, Department of Defense, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alexander, A.L., Brunye, T., Sidman, J., Weil, S.A.: From Gaming to Training: A Review of Studies on Fidelity, Immersion, Presence, and Buy-in and Their Effects on Transfer in PC-Based Simulations and Games. Aptima, Inc., Woburn (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harteveld, C.: Triadic Game Design. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feinstein, A.H., Cannon, H.M.: Fidelity, Verifiability, and Validity of Simulation: Constructs for Evaluation. Wayne State University Marketing Department Working Paper 2001-006 (2001), http://sbaweb.wayne.edu/~marketing/wp/008HC.pdf
  12. 12.
    Hays, R.T., Singer, M.J.: Simulation Fidelity In Training System Design: Bridging The Gap Between Reality And Training. Recent Research In Psychology Series. Springer, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toups, Z.O., Kerne, A., Hamilton, W.A.: The team coordination game: Zero-fidelity simulation abstracted from fire emergency response practice. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18(4), Article 23, 37 pages (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Visschedijk, G.C.: The issue of fidelity: What is needed in 3D Military Serious Games? Master Thesis, University of Twente/TNO, Soesterberg (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Endsley, M.R.: Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, pp. 97–101. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Endsley, M., Jones, W.M.:: Situation Awareness Information Dominance & Information Warfare. Tech. Rep. February, DTIC Document (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Endsley, M.R.: Designing for Situation Awareness in Complex Systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Symbiosis of Humans, Kyoto, Japan (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nofi, A.: Defining and Measuring Shared Situational Awareness. Tech. Rep. 10, Center for Naval Analyses, Arlington (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lukosch, H.K., van Ruijven, T.A.W., Verbraeck, A.: The other city? How to design authentic urban environments for serious games. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM 2012 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heide Lukosch
    • 1
  • Bas van Nuland
    • 1
  • Theo van Ruijven
    • 1
  • Linda van Veen
    • 1
  • Alexander Verbraeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations