A Negotiation Game to Support Inter-organizational Business Case Development
Nowadays, an increasing number of organizations in the supply chain are involved in business collaborations. The success of such collaborations is, among others, highly dependent on joint investment in IT system implementations. In this paper we will discuss how business cases can be used to determine the costs and benefits of such investments for each actor. Using design science as a research paradigm we develop a serious game, called SID4IOP, that helps partners in inter-organizational settings to come to an equal distribution of the costs and benefits of an investment. We will show how the introduction of anonymity, a bidding mechanism and structured information disclosure can help project partners to reach agreement on the distribution of the costs.
KeywordsBusiness Case Development Serious Gaming Coordination Negotiation Supply Chain Network
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Aldrich, C.: The Complete Guide to Simulations and Serious Games: How the Most Valuable Content Will Be Created in the Age Beyond Gutenberg to Google. Pfeiffer (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S., Zigurs, I.: The Minnesota GDSS Research Project: Group Support Systems, Group Processes, and Outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(10), 551–608 (2008)Google Scholar
- 7.Douma, A.M., Hillegersberg van, J., Schuur, P.C.: Design and evaluation of a simulation game to introduce a Multi-Agent system for barge handling in a seaport. Decision Support Systems 53(3), 465–472 (2012) ISSN 0167-9236Google Scholar
- 9.Eckartz, S.M., Katsma, C.P., Oude Maatman, R.: A Design proposal for a Benefits Management Method for Enterprise System Implementations. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2012). IEEE Computer Society, Maui (2012)Google Scholar
- 10.Keith, C.: Agile Game Development with Scrum. Addison-Wesley Professional (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Schein, E.H.: Organizational culture and leadership. John Wiley and Sons (2004)Google Scholar