Effects of a Game-Facilitated Curriculum on Technical Knowledge and Skill Development

  • Roy van Bussel
  • Heide Lukosch
  • Sebastiaan A. Meijer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8264)


Education in the European Union is one of the key factors to safeguard our competitiveness in the globalising economy. Based upon the Knowledge Triangle, the EU and its member states are working on improving the quality of education, the connection with research for transfer of new knowledge and the connection with industry to bring innovations. Within this paradigm, there are a lot of initiatives targeted towards higher and professional education to work on new teaching methods that implement the knowledge triangle better, especially for learning about complex systems and complex questions in society. From an economic point of view, however, the base of craftsmanship in society is key to keep up our productivity and ability to produce new and more advanced products, in times where most simple production activities get outsourced to developing countries. Vocational education is therefore arguably equally or even more important than higher and professional education. Unfortunately, vocational education is not yet functioning optimally. Our work represented in this paper aims to contribute to improve the outcomes of vocational education by exploring the use of gaming simulation that is already successful in other forms of education.


Theoretical Knowledge Practical Skill Game Design Simulation Game Preparation Form 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bekebrede, G., Mayer, I.S.: Build your seaport in a game and learn about complex systems. Journal of Design Research, 273–298 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bolhuis, S., Simons, P.: Naar een beter begip van leren. Retrieved from Archief Universiteit utrecht. (August 26, 2005),
  3. 3.
    Brown, K.G., Le, H., Schmidt, F.L.: Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 87–100 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalmers, A., Debattista, K.: Level of Realism for Serious games. In: IEEE Proceedings of, Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eggen, T.H., Sanders, P.F.: Psychometrie in de praktijk (September 28, 2012), (retrieved from
  6. 6.
    Feldt, L.S.: The relationship between the distriburtion of item difficulties and test reliability. Applied Measurement in Education, 37–49 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Field, A.: Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gee, G.P.: What Video Games have to teach us about Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New york (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Girard, C., Ecalle, J., Magnan, A.: Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assited learning, 1–13 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jallade, J.P.: Recent Trends in Vocational Education and Training; An Overview. European Journal of Education, 103–125 (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ke, F.: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Computer Games as Learning Tools. In: Ferdig, R.E. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education, Research Center for Educational Technology - Kent State University, kent - Ohio, pp. 1–32 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klabbers, J.H.: The Magic Circle: Principles of Gaming & Simulation. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kriz, W.C., Hense, J.U.: Theory-oriented evaluation for the design and research in gaming and simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 268–285 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lukosch, H.K., van Bussel, R.H., Meijer, S.A.: A Game Design Framework for Vocational Education. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences 6, 453–457 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lukosch, H.K., van Bussel, R.H., Meijer, S.A.: Hybrid Instructional Design for Serious Gaming. Journal of Communication and Computer, 69–76 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lukosch, H.K., van Ruijven, T., Verbraeck, A.: The other city – Designing a serious game for crisis training in close protection. In: Rothkrantz, L., Ristvej, J., Franco, Z. (eds.) ISCRAM 2012 Conference Proceedings; 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Vancouver, Canada (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meijer, S.A., Poelman, R.: Supervisor: a 3D serious game for hazard recognition training in the oil industry. In: Supervisor: a 3D Serious Game for Hazard Recognition Training in the Oil Industry, ISAGA, Poland (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meijer, S.A., Hofstede, G.J., Omta, S.W., Beers, G.: Trust and tracing game: learning about transactions and embeddedness in the trade network. Journal of Production Planning and Controle, 569–583 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merrill, D.M.: Knowledge objects and mental models. In: Wiley, D.A. (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, pp. 261–280. Agency for instructional Technology & Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Washington, DC (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Neill, H.: Globalisation, competitiveness and human security: Challenges for development policy and institutional change. The European Journal of Development Research, 7–37 (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roobeek, A.J., Mandersloot, E.H.: LWWL: Leren werken, werkend leren: een kennisnetwerkconcept voor duale leertrajecten. Van Gennip, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaffer, D.W.: Hoe Computer Games Help Children learn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sitzmann, T.: A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 489–528 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van der Steeg, M., van Elk, R., Webbink, D. (2013), Does intensive coaching reduce dropout? Evidence from a randomized experiment. CPB Nederlands Bureau for Economic policy Analysis, The Hague. (retrieved from CPB | Economische beleidsanalyse)
  25. 25.
    van Merriënboer, J.J., Kirschner, P.A.: Ten steps to complex learning (2nd Rev. Ed.). Taylor & Francis, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Veen, W., Vrakking, B.: Homo Zappiens. Growing up in a digital age. Network Continuum Education, london (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Verstegen, D.L., Severiens, S.E.: Succes- en faalfactoren in het beroepsonderwijs en de volwasseneneducatie 2006: Deelrapporten van de zevende meting van het zelfevaluatie-instrument succes- en faalfactoren. RISBO contract research BV, Rotterdam (2007b)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Verstegen, D.M., Severiens, S.E.: "Het MBO is totaal anders’Een onderzoek naar de aansluiting tussen vmbo en mbo in de zorg. RISBO Contract research BV, Rotterdam (2007a)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yussoff, A., Crowder, R., Gilbert, L., Wills, G.: A conceptual framework for serious games. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 21–23 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy van Bussel
    • 1
  • Heide Lukosch
    • 2
  • Sebastiaan A. Meijer
    • 3
  1. 1.Kenteq b.v.HilversumThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations