Integrated Interoperability Capability Model for Adaptive and Sustainable SMEs

Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 7)

Abstract

Interoperability is the ability of making systems and organizations to work together (inter-operate). Integrated interoperability represents the enterprise collective interoperability capability which composed of System interoperability and business interoperability. Business interoperability is further composed of other sub-capabilities: Strategy capability, operational capability, managerial capability, which have indirect impact on the effectiveness of system interoperability. Interoperability is broadly seen as an essential component of SMEs competitiveness and sustainability. Our research primary focus is the ‘how’ of achieving a state of interoperability that engages technology, people organizational mission, value and culture in collaborations to exchange information, knowledge or services—so that all can advance mission or achieve business success and sustainability. The objective of this research is to develop an effective and integrated interoperability Model for sustainable and adoptable SMEs. The model is empirically validated in Danish SMEs to identify the correlation between the integrated interoperability capability and the adaptive capabilities through an integrated interoperability capability model analysis. The empirical data analysis reveals that there is strong positive correlation between the firms integrated interoperability capability and their adaptive capability including: agility, resilience, and innovation.

Keywords

Integrated interoperability Adaptive capability SMEs Resilience Innovation Agility 

References

  1. 1.
    Brunnermeier, S. B., & Martin, S. A. (2002). Interoperability costs in the US automotive supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 7, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peristeras, V., & Tarabanis, K. (2006). The connection, communication, consolidation, collaboration interoperability framework (CIF) for information systems interoperability. International Journal of Interoperability in Business Information Systems, 1, 61–72.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEEE. (1990). Standard computer dictionary—A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. New York: IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., & Machiraju, V. (2003). Web services: Concepts, architectures and applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, J., & Papazoglou, M. P. (2000). Interoperation support for electronic business. Communications of the ACM, 43, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Legner, C., & Wende, K. (2006). Towards an excellence framework for business interoperability. Proceedings of the 19th Bled eConference eValues.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urs, G., & John, P. (2007). Breaking down digital barriers when and How ICT interoperability: Drives innovation. Cambridge: Berkman Publication Series.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ansoff, H. I. (1984). Implanting strategic management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vogel, D. (1991). Business ethics past and present. Public Interest, 102(1), 49–64.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grahame, W. K. (1991). Lean, mean and green. Chief Executive, 68, 30–33.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wheelwright, S. C. (1984). Manufacturing strategy: defining the missing link. Strategic Management Journal, 5(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swink, M., & Hegarty, W. H. (1998). Core manufacturing capabilities and their links to product differentiation. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18(4), 374–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayes, R. H., & Pisano, G. P. (1996). Manufacturing strategy: at the intersection of two paradigm shifts. Production and Operations Management, 5(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bughin, J., & Jacques, J. M. (1994). Managerial efficiency and the Schumpeterian link between size, market structure and innovation revisited. Research Policy, 23, 653–659.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bititci, U. S., Ackermann, F., Ates, A., Davies, J. D., Gibb, S., MacBryde, J., Mackay, D., Maguire, C., Van der Meer, R., & Shafti, F. (2011). Managerial processes: an operations management perspective towards dynamic capabilities. Production Planning and Control, 22, 157–173.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W., & Fahy, J. (2005). The performance impact of marketing resources. Journal of Business Research, 58, 18–27.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tuominen, M., Rajala, A., & Möller, K. (2004). How does adaptability drive firm innovativeness? Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Buyukcekmece CampusFatih UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations