Requirements for Supporting Enterprise Interoperability in Dynamic Environments

Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 7)

Abstract

Interoperability in enterprise systems is currently discussed from a system theoretic point of view. In the conceptual work described here, two special instances of systems theory are used as a basis allowing to detail requirements for interoperability in dynamic environments. Chaos Theory and Complex Adaptive Systems Theory focus on the description of properties of dynamic systems where the global system’s behavior cannot be determined by summing up behaviors of system parts. First a connection between enterprise systems and the theories are established. The theories are then used as a lens for analyzing and discussing initial requirements for a platform that supports interoperability in a dynamic context.

Keywords

E-learning Chaos theory Complex adaptive systems theory Enterprise interoperability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partly funded by the European Commission through the Project Marie Curie—Industry and Academia Partnerships and Pathways (IAPP) program project: IANES (Grant Agreement No. 286083). The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission for their support. For more information on the IANES project see http://www.ianes.eu.

References

  1. 1.
    von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory—foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doumeingts, G., Ducq, Y., & Chen, D. (2009). System theory to support enterprise interoperability science base. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: ICE2009-Collaborative Innovation: Emerging Technologies, Environments and Communities.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naudet, Y., Guedria, W., & Chen, D. (2009). Systems science for enterprise interoperability. Proceedings of I-ESA Conference 2009, Beijing.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ducq, Y., Chen, D., & Doumeingts, G. (2012). A contribution of system theory to sustainable enterprise interoperability science base. Computers in Industry, 63, 844–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dassisti, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Molina, A., Noran, O., Panetto, H., & Zdravković, M. (2013). Sustainability and interoperability: Two facets of the same gold medal. In Y. Demey, & H. Panetto (Eds.). On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops, (LNCS, vol. 8186), Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weichhart, G., Hämmerle, A., & Fessl, K. (2002). Service-oriented concept of a holonic enterprise—enabling adaptive networks along the value chain. Proceedings of 5th IEEE/IFIP International conference on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems in Manufacturing and Services (BASYS), Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ackoff, RL. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–67.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Senge, P. (1995). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weichhart, G. (2013). The learning environment as a chaotic and complex adaptive system. Connecting Matter, Life, Culture and Technology 1(1), 36–53. http://www.systems-journal.eu/article/view/130/138
  12. 12.
    Hite, J. A. (1999). Learning in chaos—improving human performance in today’s fast-changing, volatile organizations, houston. Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development. Six Theories of Child Development. (vol. 6, pp.1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Novak, JD., & Cañas, AJ. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC), 2008. http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryCmaps/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.htm
  17. 17.
    Weichhart, G. (2013). Supporting interoperability for chaotic and complex adaptive enterprise systems. In YT Demey & H. Panetto. (Eds.) OTM 2013 Workshops, (LNCS, vol. 8186, pp. 86–92), Springer.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naudet, Y., Latour, T., Guedria, W., & Chen, D. (2010). Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability, Computers in Industry 61, 176–185, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vernadat, FB. (2001). UEML: Towards a unified enterprise modelling language. Proceedings of the 3éConference Francophone de Modelisation et Simulation (MOSI-M’01).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IDS Scheer AG. (2000). Handbuch zur ARIS-Methode, Version 5, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vernadat, FB. (2002) Enterprise Modeling and Integration (EMI): Current status and research perspectives. Annual Reviews in Control 26, 5–25, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oppl, S., & Stary, C. (2013). Facilitating shared understanding of work situations using a tangible tabletop interface. Behavior & Information Technology.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Quartel, D., Proper, E., & Iacob, M-E. (2011). ArchiMate(R) for integrated modelling throughout the architecture development and implementation cycle. In 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), 2011. (pp. 294–301).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weichhart, G., Feiner, T., & Stary, C. (2010). Implementing organisational interoperability—the sudden approach. Computers in Industry, 61, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communications Engineering—Business InformaticsJohannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria
  2. 2.Metasonic AGPfaffenhofenGermany

Personalised recommendations