Advertisement

Dynamic Manufacturing Network, PLM Hub and Business Standards Testbed

  • Nicolas Figay
  • David Tchoffa
  • Parisa Ghodous
  • Ernesto Exposito
  • Abderrahman El Mhamedi
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 7)

Abstract

Current trends in manufacturing enterprises dealing with complex systems are usage of System Engineering, Product Life Cycle management and systematic utilization of computer aided solutions for all engineering or management activities. In such a context, sustainable and agile infrastructure for emerging digital ecosystems is required, based on open eBusiness PLM standards supporting exchange, sharing and long term archiving of digital models describing behavioural products and implied organizations. This paper will present some new ways to deal with interoperability in such a context, based on Dynamic Manufacturing Networks, constituted by a network of partner enterprises, of enterprise applications involved in the cross-organizational collaboration processes and of the underlying ICT systems. The approach will consist in qualifying such a network to support a portfolio of cross organizational processes supported by a PLM Hub, in particular in terms of interoperabilty and in terms of security, and to map it with available capabilities used by the actual collaboration participants. Then it will be possible to define the efforts required by the partners in order to be able to participate to a given kind of collaboration, making then it possible to participate in any other future collaboration where the partner will play the same role. Doing so, interoperabilty can be established in a continuous and smooth way, allowing all the digital business ecosystem community to build together their interoperability maturity. This approach is completed by the ellaboration of an associated testbed for eBusiness PLM standards allowing the community to accelerate development of required standards as well as their implementation, being by software product solutions or by industrial processes and methods. The principles will be exposed, as well as illustrations coming from research projects such as IMAGINE or IRT-SystemX SIP projects.

Keywords

Interoperability Dynamic manufacturing network Product lifecycle management Open standards Testbed 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partly funded by the European Commission through the Project IMAGINE: “Innovative End-to-end Management of Dynamic Manufacturing Networks” (Grant Agreement No. 285132). The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission for their support. We also wish to acknowledge our gratitude and appreciation to the IMAGINE Project partners for their contribution during the development of various ideas and concepts presented in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Ford, C., Colombi, J., Graham, S., & Jacques, D. (2008). A survey on interoperability measurement. In 12th ICCRTS “Adapting C2 to the 21st Century”.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris, E., Levine, L., Meyers, C., Place, P., & Plakosh, D. (2004). System of system interoperability. Technical report CMU/SEI-2004-TR-004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEEE standard computer dictionary: Compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. New York, NY. (1990). Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISA. (2011). European interoperability framework (EIF)—towards interoperability for European public services. ISBN 978-92-79-21515-5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Obstr, L. (2009). Ontologies and the semantic web for semantic interoperability. SICOP909.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Figay, N., & Ghodous, P. (2009). Innovative interoperability framework for enterprise applications. Medes.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ATHENA Interoperability Framework. http://athena.modelbased.net/
  8. 8.
    Berre, A. et al. (2007). The ATHENA interoperability framework. IESA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Figay, N., & Ghodous, P. (2009). FLOSS as enterprise applications interoperability enabler. SITIS.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Figay, N. (2009). Interoperability of technical enterprise applications (Ph.D. thesis report, University Lyon 1, 2009).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASD Strategic Standardization Group. http://www.asd-ssg.org
  12. 12.
    EU FP7 Project. (2009–2012). Collaborative and robust engineering using simulation capability enabling next design optimisation. http://www.crescendo-fp7.eu/
  13. 13.
    Java Specification Request 168: Portlet specification. Retrieved October 27, 2003, from http://jcp.org
  14. 14.
    Java Specification Request 286: Portlet specification 2.0. Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://jcp.org/
  15. 15.
    Maler, E. et al. (2003). Assertions and protocols for the OASIS security assertion markup language (SAML). OASIS. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/
  16. 16.
    FP7 IMAGINE project. Innovative end-to-end management of dynamic manufacturing networks. http://www.imagine-futurefactory.eu
  17. 17.
    The Open Group. ArchiMate 2.0. https://www2.opengroup.org/
  18. 18.
    Archi ArchiMate modeling. http://archi.cetis.ac.uk/
  19. 19.
    ANSI/ISA-95.00.01-2000. Enterprise-control system integration part 1: models and terminology. http://www.isa-95.com/
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    ATHENA FP6 IST 507849. Advanced technologies for interoperability of heterogeneous enterprise networks and their application. http://interop-vlab.eu/ei_public_deliverables/athena-deliverables/?searchterm=athena

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Figay
    • 1
  • David Tchoffa
    • 2
  • Parisa Ghodous
    • 3
  • Ernesto Exposito
    • 4
  • Abderrahman El Mhamedi
    • 2
  1. 1.EADS IWSuresnesFrance
  2. 2.University Paris8MontreuilFrance
  3. 3.LIRIS-CNRS, Université Lyon1Lyon1France
  4. 4.LAAS-CNRS, INSAToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations