Decision Tree and Agent-Based Approach to Specify Inter-Company Cooperation Using Offline Services Composition

  • Meriem Kermani
  • Mahmoud Boufaida
  • Emmanuel Paviot-Adet
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 7)

Abstract

With the deep development of economic globalization, companies tend now to collaborate closely with each others to improve their competitiveness. The problems of interoperability have recently been the subject of considerable amount of studies. In this paper, we propose a mediation based approach, which allows to a set of heterogeneous companies to cooperate. So, they can form a company network called SoS “system of systems”. The purpose of this solution is to keep the company architecture and to ask the mediator that is a software-based agent to play an intermediary role between companies, and to make the transformation between companies as well. We define a dynamic and cooperative inter companies model. The dynamic aspect gives the possibility to change the collection of services involved in the collaboration. Our model combines the agent technology and the decision trees paradigm. This last facilitates making decision by selecting the services that best meet customer needs, in order to create a composite service. The realization of the offline composition process by mediator saves the response time. Once the service is executable it will be published to permit its reuse.

Keywords

Multi agent systems Decision tree Interoperability Cooperative process 

References

  1. 1.
    Hoeta, S., & Saboureta, N. (2010) Simplification de la mémoire des agents en utilisant des FMDP. In 18th Journées Francophones sur les Systèmes Multi-Agents (JFSMA'10) (pp. 13–22).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boukadi, K., Vincent, L., Ghedira, C., & Maamar, Z. (2010). CSMA: Context-based, service-oriented modeling and analysis method for modern enterprise applications. International Journal of Organizational & Collective Intelligence, 1(2), 1–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Namin, A. S., Shen, W., & Ghenniwa, H. (2006). Implementing enterprise collaboration using web services and software agents. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations: Special Issue on Organizing Collaborative Supply Chains and Networks, 3(2), 185–201.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Indulska, M., Green, P., Recker, J., & Rosemann, M. (2009). Business process modeling: Perceived benefits. ER2009 (458–471) Gramado, Brazil.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henderson, S., Gonzalez, S. P., & Ralyté, J. (2007). Situational method engineering: Chunks or fragments. The CAiSE Forum, Trondheim.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rolland, C. (2009). Method engineering: Towards methods as services. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 14, 143–164.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Touzi, J., Bénaben, F., & Pingaud, H. (2008). Prototype to support morphism between BPMN collaborative process model and collaborative SOA architecture model. In 4th International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Truptil, S., Bénaben, F., & Pingaud, P. (2011). On-the-fly adaptation of crisis response information system. In Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brahimi, M., Boufaida, M., & Seinturier, L. (2009). Multi-agent architecture for developing cooperative e-business applications. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 2(4), 43–62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mallek, S., Daclin, N., & Chapurlat, N. (2011). An approach for interoperability requirements specification and verification. In Third International IFIP Working Conference.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hui, L., Anne, F., Cutting, D., & Bourey, J. P. (2010). Use of ontology for solving interoperability problems between enterprises. In 11th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Lascoux, J. L. (2007). Pratique de la médiation, Editeur ESF, ISBN-10: 2710118599.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meriem Kermani
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Boufaida
    • 1
  • Emmanuel Paviot-Adet
    • 2
  1. 1.LIRE LaboratoryConstantine 2 UniversityConstantineAlgéria
  2. 2.LIP6 LaboratoryPierre and Marie Curie UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations