Impacts Assessment of Collaboration on Carrier Performance

Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 7)

Abstract

Freight transport is an essential element of our economy. It allows the goods to travel from their production place to customers. In France this activity implies many companies. Most of them are very little ones and are threatened by the economic crisis. This article studies how collaborative approach allow those companies finding solution to improve their performances. We simulate different scenarios which highlight benefits in particular in dynamic context when a last minute unforeseen change occurs. As interoperability is essential for collaboration implementation, companies must integrate its dimension in their development policy.

Keywords

Interoperability Collaboration Transport Performance Last minute unforeseen change 

References

  1. 1.
    Zhou, H., & Benton, W. (2007). Supply chain practice and information sharing. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1348–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roth, A., Cattani, K., & Froehle, C. (2008). Antecedents and performance outcomes of global competence: An ampirical investigation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 25(1–2), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2007). Supply chain risk management and performance: A guiding framework for future development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(3), 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    SCOR. Home. Retrieved Nov 02, 2013, from http://www.supply-chain.org/scor
  5. 5.
    Kaplan, R., & Johnson, H. T. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review, 39(1), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sakka, O., Botta-Genoulaz, V., & Trilling, L. (2009). Modélisation des facteurs influençant la performance de la chaine logistique. [Hal 00389129, version 1], pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanders, N. (2007). An empirical study of the impact of e-business technologies on organizational collaboration and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1332–1347.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ODETTE. Global MMOG/LE. Retrieved Nov 02, 2013, from http://www.odette.org/services/mmog
  10. 10.
    Deshamps, J. C., Amrioui, S., & Malhéné, N. (2011). Indicateurs de performance. Livrable Prodige 1.3, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malhéné, N., & Deschamps, J. C. (2010). De la traçabilité au routage des produits en transport routier. 8èmes Rencontres Internationales de Recherche en Logistique, RIRL’10, vol. 29, 30 Septembre et 1er Octobre 2010. Bordeaux (France).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amrioui, S., Malhéné, N., & Deschamps, J. C. (2012). Treacability in collaborative logistics : How to use EPCGlobal solution in transport reconfiguration. 6th IEEE Conference on Digital Ecosystem Technologies—Complex Environment Engineering (IEEE DEST-CEE 2012), June 18–20, 2012. Campione d’Italia (Italy).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samir Amrioui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Esther Leleu
    • 2
  • Nicolas Malhéné
    • 2
  1. 1.IMS/LAPS, University Bordeaux1TalenceFrance
  2. 2.EIGSILa RochelleFrance

Personalised recommendations