Skip to main content

On the State Complexity of Semi-quantum Finite Automata

  • Conference paper
Book cover Language and Automata Theory and Applications (LATA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8370))

Abstract

Some of the most interesting and important results concerning quantum finite automata are those showing that they can recognize certain languages with (much) less resources than corresponding classical finite automata. This paper shows three results of such a type that are stronger in some sense than other ones because (a) they deal with models of quantum finite automata with very little quantumness (so-called semi-quantum one- and two-way finite automata); (b) differences, even comparing with probabilistic classical automata, are bigger than expected; (c) a trade-off between the number of classical and quantum basis states needed is demonstrated in one case and (d) languages (or the promise problem) used to show main results are very simple and often explored ones in automata theory or in communication complexity, with seemingly little structure that could be utilized.

Work of the first and second authors was supported by the Employment of Newly Graduated Doctors of Science for Scientific Excellence project/grant (CZ.1.07./2.3.00/30.0009) of Czech Republic. Work of third author was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61272058, 61073054).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambainis, A., Nayak, A., Ta-Shma, A., Vazirani, U.: Dense quantum coding and quantum automata. Journal of the ACM 49(4), 496–511 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambainis, A., Watrous, J.: Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states. Theoretical Computer Science 287, 299–311 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambainis, A., Freivalds, R.: One-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations. In: Proceedings of the 39th FOCS, pp. 332–341 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ambainis, A., Nahimovs, N.: Improved constructions of quantum automata. Theoretical Computer Science 410, 1916–1922 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambainis, A., Yakaryilmaz, A.: Superiority of exact quantum automata for promise problems. Information Processing Letters 112(7), 289–291 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertoni, A., Mereghetti, C., Palano, B.: Some formal tools for analyzing quantum automata. Theoretical Computer Science 356, 14–25 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Buhrman, H., Cleve, R., Massar, S., de Wolf, R.: Nonlocality and Communication Complexity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 665–698 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dwork, C., Stockmeyer, L.: A time-complexity gap for two-way probabilistic finite state automata. SIAM J. Comput. 19, 1011–1023 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Freivalds, R.: On the growth of the number of states in result of determinization of probabilistic finite automata. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 3, 39–42 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gruska, J.: Descriptional complexity issues in quantum computing. J. Automata, Languages Combin. 5(3), 191–218 (2000)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addision-Wesley, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiraz, G.A.: Compressed Storage of Sparse Finite-State Transducers. In: Boldt, O., Jürgensen, H. (eds.) WIA 1999. LNCS, vol. 2214, pp. 109–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Klauck, H.: On quantum and probabilistic communication: Las Vegas and one-way protocols. In: Proceedings of the 32th STOC, pp. 644–651 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kondacs, A., Watrous, J.: On the power of quantum finite state automata. In: Proceedings of the 38th FOCS, pp. 66–75 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kushilevitz, E.: Communication Complexity. Advances in Computers 44, 331–360 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mereghetti, C., Pighizzini, G.: Two-way automata simulations and unary languages. J. Autom. Lang. Comb. 5, 287–300 (2000)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mereghetti, C., Palano, B., Pighizzini, G.: Note on the Succinctness of Deterministic, Nondeterministic, Probabilistic and Quantum Finite Automata. RAIRO-Inf. Theor. Appl. 35, 477–490 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, C., Crutchfield, J.P.: Quantum automata and quantum grammars. Theoretical Computer Science 237, 275–306 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Paz, A.: Introduction to Probabilistic Automata. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Qiu, D.: Some Observations on Two-Way Finite Automata with Quantum and Classical States. In: Huang, D.-S., Wunsch II, D.C., Levine, D.S., Jo, K.-H. (eds.) ICIC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5226, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Rabin, M.O., Scott, D.: Finite automata and their decision problems. IBM J. Research and Development 3(2), 115–125 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Salomaa, A.: On the reducibility of events represented in automata. In: Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, volume Series A of I. Mathematica 353 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yakaryilmaz, A., Cem Say, A.C.: Succinctness of two-way probabilistic and quantum finite automata. Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 12(4), 19–40 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng, S.G., Qiu, D.W., Li, L.Z., Gruska, J.: One-way finite automata with quantum and classical states. In: Bordihn, H., Kutrib, M., Truthe, B. (eds.) Languages Alive. LNCS, vol. 7300, pp. 273–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng, S.G., Qiu, D.W., Gruska, J., Li, L.Z., Mateus, P.: State succinctness of two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states. Theoretical Computer Science 499, 98–112 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng, S.G., Gruska, J., Qiu, D.W.: On the state complexity of semi-quantum finite automata. arXiv:1307.2499 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zheng, S., Gruska, J., Qiu, D. (2014). On the State Complexity of Semi-quantum Finite Automata. In: Dediu, AH., Martín-Vide, C., Sierra-Rodríguez, JL., Truthe, B. (eds) Language and Automata Theory and Applications. LATA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8370. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04921-2_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04921-2_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04920-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04921-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics