Advertisement

Violation of Interdomain Routing Assumptions

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8362)

Abstract

We challenge a set of assumptions that are frequently used to model interdomain routing in the Internet by confronting them with routing decisions that are actually taken by ASes, as revealed through publicly available BGP feeds. Our results quantify for the first time the extent to which such assumptions are too simple to model real-world Internet routing policies. This should introduce a note of caution into future work that makes these assumptions and should prompt attempts to find more accurate models.

Keywords

Local Preference Good Route Snapshot Statistic Assumption Violation Relationship Inference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yan, H., Oliveira, R., Burnett, K., Matthews, D., Zhang, L., Massey, D.: BGPmon: A real-time, scalable, extensible monitoring system. In: Proc. CATCH (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CAIDA: The CAIDA AS Ranking service, http://as-rank.caida.org/
  3. 3.
    CAIDA: The CAIDA AS Relationships dataset, http://www.caida.org/data/active/as-relationships/
  4. 4.
    Rekhter, Y., Li, T.: A border gateway protocol 4 (BGP-4). RFC 1771, Internet Engineering Task Force (March 1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao, L.: On inferring autonomous system relationships in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 9(6), 733–745 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buob, M.O., Meulle, M., Uhlig, S.: Checking for optimal egress points in iBGP routing. In: Proc. DRCN (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teixeira, R., Shaikh, A., Griffin, T., Voelker, G.M.: Network sensitivity to hot-potato disruptions. In: Proc. SIGCOMM (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mühlbauer, W., Feldmann, A., Maennel, O., Roughan, M., Uhlig, S.: Building an AS-topology model that captures route diversity. In: Proc. SIGCOMM (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mühlbauer, W., Uhlig, S., Fu, B., Meulle, M., Maennel, O.: In search for an appropriate granularity to model routing policies. In: Proc. SIGCOMM (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Javed, U., Cunha, I., Choffnes, D., Katz-Bassett, E., Anderson, T., Krishnamurthy, A.: PoiRoot: Investigating the root cause of interdomain path changes. In: Proc. SIGCOMM (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Subramanian, L., Agarwal, S., Rexford, J., Katz, R.: Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points. In: Proc. Infocom (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Battista, G., Patrignani, M., Pizzonia, M.: Computing the types of the relationships between autonomous systems. In: Proc. Infocom (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xia, J., Gao, L.: On the evaluation of AS relationship inferences. In: Proc. Globecom (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dimitropoulos, X., Krioukov, D., Huffaker, B., Claffy, K., Riley, G.: Inferring AS relationships: Dead end or lively beginning? In: Nikoletseas, S.E. (ed.) WEA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3503, pp. 113–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dimitropoulos, X., Krioukov, D., Fomenkov, M., Huffaker, B., Hyun, Y., Claffy, K., Riley, G.: AS relationships: inference and validation. ACM SIGCOMM CCR 37(1), 29–40 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shavitt, Y., Shir, E., Weinsberg, U.: Near-deterministic inference of AS relationships. In: Proc. ConTEL (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., Dhamdhere, A., Giotsas, V., Claffy, K.: AS relationships, customer cones, and validation. In: Proc. IMC (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feamster, N., Balakrishnan, H.: Detecting BGP configuration faults with static analysis. In: Proc. NSDI (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gill, P., Schapira, M., Goldberg, S.: A survey of interdomain routing policies. ACM SIGCOMM CCR (to appear, 2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giotsas, V., Zhou, S.: Detecting and assessing the hybrid IPv4/IPv6 As relationships. In: Proc. SIGCOMM (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roughan, M., Willinger, W., Maennel, O., Perouli, D., Bush, R.: 10 lessons from 10 years of measuring and modeling the Internet’s Autonomous Systems. IEEE JSAC 29(9), 1810–1821 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UPMC Sorbonne UniversitésUSA
  2. 2.Telecom ParisTechFrance

Personalised recommendations