Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Literacy in the Arts pp 3–19Cite as

Literacy and the Arts: Interpretation and Expression of Symbolic Form

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

To consider the arts and literacy is a huge undertaking. Each concept alone could constitute several volumes. The investigation of the arts and literacy is not new, of course. Some literacy research has shown how using the arts and/or creative approaches to learning can enhance and improve literacy skills for children (Albers P, Sanders J, Literacies, the arts and multimodality. National Council of Teachers, Urbana, 2010; Brice-Heath S, Three’s not a crowd: plans, roles, and focus in the arts. Educ Res 30(7):10–17, 2001; Caldwell B, Vaughan T, Transforming literacy through the arts. Routledge, London, 2011; Korn R, Solomon R. Guggenheim museum teaching literacy through art: final report. Museum Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Audience Research, Korn and Associates, Alexandria, 2007) and this research often stems from a language arts approach. Although much of this research highlights the importance of the arts in education, it tends to be framed from an English education point of view and therefore is limited in recognising the unique approach that the arts have in terms of literate practice. This chapter aims to introduce the concepts of literacy and literate practice in the arts. It aims to demonstrate how students of the arts are expected to operate and think in order to become arts literate in practice and inquiry, that is, how one may become more proficient or fluent in the discourse of art critique, production and consumption. The chapter argues that the arts are inherently multimodal and concern themselves with the communication of ideas and feelings through multiple symbolic forms. Therefore an advanced definition of literacy as interpretive and expressive fluency through symbolic form, whether aural/sonic, embodied, textual, visual, written or a combination of these within the context of a particular art form is offered. This distinction is important because it moves beyond the established view of arts literacy as an extension of English literacy and more accurately conveys the proprietary processes and practices evident in the way students learn their craft and ultimately emerge as arts practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The image can be viewed at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/06/120614-neanderthal-cave-paintings-spain-science-pike/

References

  • Adams, J. (2011). The degradation of the arts in education. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 30, 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albers, P., & Harste, J. C. (2007). The arts, new literacies, and multimodality. English Education, 40(1), 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albers, P., & Sanders, J. (2010). Literacies, the arts and multimodality. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, V., & Beardsley, E. (1963). Philosophy of art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altamira museum, Image of bison, Spain. Retrieved from: http://museodealtamira.mcu.es/

  • Alvermann, D. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, G. M. (2004). The influence of culture on instrumental music teaching: A participant-observation case study of Karnatic and Queensland instrumental music teachers in context (Unpublished PhD thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, G. M., Baguley, M., & MacDonald, A. (2013). Seeing the bigger picture: Investigating the state of the arts in teacher education programs in Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(7), http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol38/iss7/6

  • Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, G. M., & Unsworth, L. (2014). Music, multiliteracies and multimodality: Exploring the book and movie versions of Shaun Tan’s The Lost Thing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, M. (1965). On creation of art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 23(3), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brice-Heath, S. (2001). Three’s not a crowd: Plans, roles, and focus in the arts. Educational Researcher, 30(7), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B., & Vaughan, T. (2011). Transforming literacy through the arts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, E., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Image-language interaction in online reading environments: Challenges for students’ reading comprehension. Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigree Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. C. (2001). The student as maker: An examination of the meaning of music to students in a school and the ways in which we give access to meaningful music education. Unpublished PhD thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. C. (2007). Music, meaning and transformation: Meaningful music making for life. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncum, P. (1999). A case for an art education of everyday aesthetic experiences. Studies in Art Education, 40(4), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncum, P. (2004). Visual culture isn’t just visual: Multiliteracy, multimodality and meaning. Studies in Art Education, 45(3), 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (2010). The arts and Australian education: Realising potential. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy education in school: Research perspectives from the past, for the future. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (1988). Music on deaf ears: Musical meaning, ideology, education. New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1991). Aesthetic literacy. In R. Smith & A. Simpson (Eds.), Aesthetics and arts education (pp. 149–161). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, J. (1993). A womb with a view: Visual dialogue in a cultural context. In E. P. Errington (Ed.), Arts education: Beliefs, practices and possibilities. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handerhan, E. C. (1993). Literacy, aesthetic education, and problem solving. Theory into Practice, 32(4), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, R. (2007). Solomon R. Guggenheim museum teaching literacy through art: Final report. Museum Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Audience Research, Alexandria, VA: Korn and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Hodder Arnold Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. (1953). Feeling and form. New York: Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2005). Place, pace and meaning. Multimedia chronotopes. In S. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (2005). “… an entry into further language”: Contra mystification by language hierarchies. In T. L. McCarthy (Ed.), Language, literacy, and power in schooling (pp. 111–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuirk, R. (2012). Archeologist says 28,000-year-old rock art found in cave oldest in Australia. Whitehorse Star. Whitehorse, YT: 18 June 2012, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E. L., & Haukka, S. (2008). Educating the creative workforce: New directions for 21st century schooling. British Education Research Journal, 34(5 (Special Issues on Creativity and Performativity)), 651–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E., Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Geographic. Retrieved from: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/06/120614-neanderthal-cave-paintings-spain-science-pike/

  • Piazza, C. (1999). Multiple forms of literacy: Teaching literacy and the arts. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B. (1989). A philosophy of music education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (1992). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2001). Art as dramatization. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59(4), 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A., & Simpson, A. (Eds.). (1991). Aesthetics and arts education. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge. Ch 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G., & Gips, J. (1972). Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In C. V. Freiman (Ed.). Information Processing, 71, 1460–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (1999). Indigenous education and literacy learning. In D. A. Wagner, R. L. Venezky, & B. V. Street (Eds.), Literacy: An international handbook (pp. 283–287). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (1990). Musical beliefs: Mythical and educational perspectives. New York/London: Teachers college press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1990). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young. San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2012). Children, meaning-making and the arts (2nd ed.). Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoss, M. (2009). Visual arts and literacy. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 183–196). New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Georgina Barton

Authors
  1. Georgina Barton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgina Barton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education & Prof. Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Georgina Barton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barton, G. (2014). Literacy and the Arts: Interpretation and Expression of Symbolic Form. In: Barton, G. (eds) Literacy in the Arts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04846-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation