Skip to main content

A Conjoint Analysis Exercise to Assess Quality Attributes in Freight Transport: Outcomes from a Survey Among Logistics Managers of Manufacturing Firms in North West Italy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analytical Decision-Making Methods for Evaluating Sustainable Transport in European Corridors

Abstract

This chapter reports the results of a conjoint analysis experiment performed in North West Italy to investigate shippers’ sensitivity and preferences for four relevant freight transport attributes: transport cost, time, punctuality and risk of damage and loss. The empirical study and the subsequent model estimation provided interesting results: shippers evaluate quality attributes, such as punctuality and avoidance of risk of damage and loss more important than travel time savings and indicate a high willingness to pay to increase freight transport service reliability and safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beuthe M et al (2002) A multi-criteria methodology for stated preferences among freight transport alternatives. In: 7th NECTAR conference: a new millennium. Are things the same? Umea

    Google Scholar 

  2. Danielis R, Rotaris L, Marcucci E (2005) Logistics managers stated preferences for freight service attributes. Transp Res Part E Logistics Transp Rev 41:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Danielis R, Marcucci E (2006) Trasporto stradale o intermodale ferroviario? I risultati di un'indagine sulla struttura delle preferenze di alcune aziende manifatturiere italiane. Working paper n. 107, Dipartimento di scienze economiche e statistiche, University of Trieste

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danielis R (2002) Freight transport demand and stated preference experiments. Milan, Franco Angeli

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jong G, Bakker S, Wortelboer-van Donselaar P (2004) New values of time and reliability in freight transport in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the European transport conference

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jong G (2008) Value of freight travel-time savings, revised and extended chapter for handbooks in transport I. Handbooks of Transport Modelling, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kofteci S, Ergun M, Ay HS (2010) Modeling freight transportation preferences: conjoint analysis for Turkish region. Sci Res Essays 5(15):2016–2021

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maggi R, Rudel R (2008) The value of quality attributes in freight transport. Evidence from an SP-Experiment in Switzerland. In: Ben-Akiva M, Meersman H, Van de Voorde E (eds) Recent developments in transport modelling: lessons for the freight sector. Emerald, West Yorkshire

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marcucci E (2005) I modelli di scelta discrete per l’analisi dei trasporti. Carrocci, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  10. Masiero L, Hensher DA (2010) Analyzing loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity in a freight transport stated choice experiment. Transp Res Part A 44:349–358

    Google Scholar 

  11. Masiero L, Maggi R (2010) Accounting for WTP/WTA discrepancy in discrete choice models: discussion of policy implications based on two freight transport stated choice experiments. Quaderno N. 11-03, Faculty of Economics, University of Lugano

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orme BK (2005) Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Research Publishers, Madison, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ortuzar J, Willumsen LG (2001) Modelling transport, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shinghal N, Fowkes T (2002) Freight mode choice and adaptive stated prefereces. Transp Res Part E 38:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Significance, VU University Amsterdam, John Bates Services, in collaboration with TNO, NEA, TNS NIPO and PanelClix (2013) Values of time and reliability in passenger and freight transport in The Netherlands, report for the Ministry of infrastructure and the environment. Significance, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  16. Train KE (2009) Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zotti J, Danielis R (2004) Freight transport demand in the mechanics’ sector of Friuli Venezia Giulia: the choice between intermodal and road transport. European Transport/Trasporti Europei 25–26:9–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziana Delmastro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnone, M., de Jong, G., Delmastro, T., Giverso, A., Inaudi, D. (2014). A Conjoint Analysis Exercise to Assess Quality Attributes in Freight Transport: Outcomes from a Survey Among Logistics Managers of Manufacturing Firms in North West Italy. In: Lami, I. (eds) Analytical Decision-Making Methods for Evaluating Sustainable Transport in European Corridors. SxI - Springer for Innovation / SxI - Springer per l'Innovazione, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04786-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics