Advertisement

Semantic Data Interfaces for the Masses

  • Silvio Peroni
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 15)

Abstract

Extensive research has been done on models, theoretical approaches and development of tools to infer new information from data and ontologies. However, the Semantic Web will only be fully integrated with the everyday-Web only when it will be easily available and fully accessible to every Web users and not only to Semantic Web practitioners. The Semantic Publishing community urgently needs specific tools to assist non-experts in dealing with and publishing semantic data. In this chapter, I describe influential work and my personal contribution to this area. In addition, I discuss possible next steps to extend existing legislative editor by means of Semantic Web technologies, and highlight the key characteristics of semantically-enhanced legislative editors of the future.

Keywords

Domain Ontology Markup Language Semantic Data Ontology Engineering System Usability Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Auer, S., S. Dietzold, and T. Riechert. 2006. OntOWiki—A tool for social, semantic collaboration. In Proceedings of the 5th international semantic web conference (ISWC 2006), eds. I. F. Cruz, S. Decker, D. Allemang, C. Preist, D. Schwabe, P. Mika, M. Uschold, and L. Aroyo, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4273, 736–749. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/11926078_53.Google Scholar
  2. Auer, S., C. Bizer, J. Lehmann, G. Kobilarov, R. Cyganiak, and Z. Ives. 2007. DBpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In Proceedings of 6th international semantic web conference and of the 2nd Asian semantic web conference (ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007), eds. K. Aberer, K. Choi, N. F. Noy, D. Allemang, K. Lee, L. J. B. Nixon, J. Golbeck, P. Mika, D. Maynard, R. Mizoguchi, G. Schreiber, and P. Cudré-Mauroux, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4825, 722–735. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52.Google Scholar
  3. Bao, J., P. R. Smart, N. Shadbolt, D. Braines, and G. Jones. 2009. A controlled natural language interface for semantic media wiki. In Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference of the International Technology Alliance (ACITA2009), 23–24 Sept 2009. Maryland, USA. http://www.usukita.org/papers/4551/SemanticWikiv7.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  4. Basca, C., S. Corlosquet, R. Cyganiak, S. Fernández, and T. Schandl. 2008. Neologism: easy vocabulary publishing. In Proceedings of the 4th workshop on scripting for the semantic web, eds. C. Bizer, S. Auer, G. A. Grimnes, and T. Heath. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 368. Aachen: CEUR-WS-org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-368/paper10.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  5. Beckett, D. 2004. RDF/XML syntax specification (revised). W3C recommendation, 10 Feb 2004. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  6. Berrueta, D., and J. Phipps. 2008. Best practice recipes for publishing RDF vocabularies. W3C working group note 28 Aug 2008. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  7. Birks, M., and J. Mills. 2011. Grounded theory: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. (ISBN: 978-1848609938).Google Scholar
  8. Bojars, U., and J. G. Breslin. 2010. SIOC core ontology specification. 25 March 2010. http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  9. Boley, H., G. Hallmark, M. Kifer, A. Paschke, A. Polleres, and D. Reynolds. 2013. RIF core dialect. 2nd ed.. W3C recommendation, 5 Feb 2013. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-core/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  10. Bolognini, V., A. Di Iorio, S. Duca, A. Musetti, S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2009. Exploiting ontologies to deploy user-friendly and customized metadata editors. In Proceedings of the IADIS Internet/WWW 2009 conference, eds. B. White, P. Isaías, and M. B. Nunes. Lisbon: IADIS.Google Scholar
  11. Brockmans, S., R. Volz, A. Eberhart, and P. Löffler. 2004. Visual modeling of OWL DL ontologies using UML. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), eds. S. A. McIlraith, D. Plexousakis, and F. van Harmelen, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 3298, 198–213. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_15.Google Scholar
  12. Brockmans, S., P. Haase, P. Hitzler, and R. Studer. 2006. A metamodel and UML profile for rule-extended OWL DL ontologies. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2006), eds. Y. Sure and J. Domingue, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4011, 303–316. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/11762256_24.Google Scholar
  13. Brooke, J. 1996. SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry, eds. P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and A. L. McClelland, 189–194. London: Taylor and Francis. (ISBN: 0748404600).Google Scholar
  14. Buffa, M., F. Gandon, G. Ereteo, P. Sander, and C. Faron. 2008. SweetWiki: A semantic wiki. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 6 (1): 84–97. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buitelaar, P., P. Cimiano, and E. Montiel-Ponsoda, eds. 2010. Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on the Multilingual Semantic Web (MSW 2010). CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 571. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-571/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  16. Buitelaar, P., P. Cimiano, D. Lewis, J. Pustejovsky, and F. Sasaki, eds. 2012. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on the Multilingual Semantic Web (MSW 2012). CEUR workshop proceedings 936. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-936/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  17. Carroll, J., I. Dickinson, C. Dollin, D. Reynolds, A. Seaborne, and K. Wilkinson. 2004. Jena: Implementing the semantic web recommendations. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web—Alternate track papers & posters (WWW 2004), eds. S. I. Feldman, M. Uretsky, M. Najork, and C. E. Wills, 74–83. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1013367.1013381.Google Scholar
  18. d’Aquin, M., and E. Motta. 2011. Watson, more than a semantic web search engine. Semantic Web—Interoperability, Usability, Applicability 2 (1): 55–63. doi:10.3233/SW-2011-0031.Google Scholar
  19. De Coi, J. L., N. E. Fuchs, K. Kaljurand, and T. Kuhn. 2009. Controlled English for reasoning on the semantic web. In Semantic techniques for the web—The REWERSE perspective, eds. F. Bry and J. Maluszynski, 276–308. (ISBN: 3642045806).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dello, K., E. B. S. Paslaru, and R. Tolksdorf. 2006. Creating and using semantic web information with makna. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on semantic wikis—From wiki to semantics, eds. M. Völkel and S. Schaffert. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 206. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-206/paper4.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  21. Di Iorio, A., A. Musetti, S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2010a. Crowdsourcing semantic content: A model and two applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on human system interaction (HSI10), ed. T. Pardela, 563–570. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HSI.2010.5514513.Google Scholar
  22. Di Iorio, A., A. Musetti, S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2010b. Ontology-driven generation of wiki content and interfaces. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 16 (1): 9–31. doi:10.1080/13614568.2010.497194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Iorio, A., A. Musetti, S. Peroni, F. Vitali. 2011a. OWiki: Enabling an ontology-led creation of semantic data. In Human-computer systems interaction: Backgrounds and applications 2, eds. Z. S. Hippe, J. L. Kulikowski, and T. Mroczek. Berlin: Springer. (ISBN: 3642231711).Google Scholar
  24. Di Iorio, A., S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2011b. A semantic web approach to everyday overlapping markup. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (9): 1696–1716. doi:10.1002/asi.21591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dragan, L., S. Handschuh, and S. Decker. 2011. The semantic desktop at work: Interlinking notes. In Proceedings the 7th international conference on semantic systems (I-SEMANTICS 2011), eds. C. Ghidini, A. Ngonga Ngomo, S. N. Lindstaedt, and T.Pellegrini, 17–24. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2063518.2063521.Google Scholar
  26. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2012a. DCMI metadata terms. DCMI recommendation. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  27. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2012b. Dublin core metadata element set, version 1.1. DCMI recommendation. http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  28. Gamma, E., R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. 1994. Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Boston: Addison-Wesley. (ISBN: 0201633610).Google Scholar
  29. Gardenfors, P. 2000. Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge: Bradford Books. (ISBN: 0262071991).Google Scholar
  30. Garlik, S. H., and A. Seaborne. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 Query language. W3C recommendation 21 March 2013. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  31. Gasevic, D., D. Djuric, V. Devedzic, and V. Damjanovic. 2004. Converting UML to OWL ontologies. In Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on alternate track papers & posters (WWW Alt 04), 488–489. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1013367.1013539.Google Scholar
  32. Harth, C., H. Gassert, I. O’Murchu, J. G. Breslin, and S. Decker. 2005. WikiOnt: An ontology for describing and exchanging Wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of Wikimania 2005, eds. J. Voss, A. Lih, S. Klein, and C. Ma. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania05/Paper-IM1. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  33. Horridge, M., and S. Bechhofer. 2011. The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web—Interoperability, Usability, Applicability 2 (1): 11–21. doi:10.3233/SW-2011-0025.Google Scholar
  34. Horridge, M., and P. Patel-Schneider. 2012. OWL 2 Web ontology language Manchester syntax. 2nd ed. W3C working group note 11 Dec 2012. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  35. Katifori, A., E. Torou, C. Halatsis, G. Lepouras, and C. Vassilakis. 2006. A comparative study of four ontology visualization techniques in Protege: Experiment setup and preliminary results. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on information visualisation (IV 2006), eds. E. Banissi, R. A. Burkhard, A. Ursyn, J. J. Zhang, M. Bannatyne, C. Maple, A. J. Cowell, G. Y. Tian, and M. Hou, 417–423. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/IV.2006.3.Google Scholar
  36. Katifori, A., C. Halatsis, G. Lepouras, C. Vassilakis, and E. Giannopoulou. 2007. Ontology visualization methods—A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 39 (4): Article 10. doi:10.1145/1287620.1287621.Google Scholar
  37. Kay, J., and A. Lum. 2003. An ontologically enhanced metadata editor. University of Sidney, School of Information Technologies, Technical Report 541. http://www.it.usyd.edu.au/research/tr/tr541.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  38. Klein, B., C. Höcht, and B. Decker. 2005. Beyond capturing and maintaining software engineering knowledge—“Wikitology” as shared semantics. Presented during the workshop on Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering (KESE 2005). 11 Sept 2005, Koblenz, Germany. http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/˜klein/papers/finalKESE05.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  39. Knublauch, H., M. Horridge, M. A. Musen, A. L. Rector, R. Stevens, N. Drummond, P. W. Lord, N. F. Noy, J. Seidenberg, and H. Wang. 2005. The Protege OWL experience. In Proceedings of the OWLED 05 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and directions, eds. B. C. Grau, I. Horrocks, B. Parsia, P. F. Patel-Schneider. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 188. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-188/sub14.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  40. Kriglstein, S., and R. Motschnig-Pitrik. 2008. Knoocks: New visualization approach for ontologies. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Information Visualisation (IV 2008), 163–168. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/IV.2008.16.Google Scholar
  41. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. (ISBN: 0226468046).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. (ISBN: 0226468011).Google Scholar
  43. Lewis, J. R., and J. Sauro. 2009. The factor structure of the system usability scale. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on human centered design (HCD 09), ed. M. Kurosu, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 5619, 94–103. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-64202806-9_12.Google Scholar
  44. Li, N., E. Motta, and M. d’Aquin. 2010. Ontology summarization: An analysis and an evaluation. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Evaluation of Semantic Technologies (IWEST 2010), eds. A. Gomez-Perez, F. Ciravegna, F. van Harmelen, and J. Hefflin. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 666. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-666/paper8.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  45. McCane, S., D. Lewis, C. Lieske, A. Lommel, J. Kosek, F. Sasaki, and Y. Savourel. 2013. Internationalization tag set (ITS) version 2.0. W3C recommendation 29 Oct 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  46. Montiel-Ponsoda, E., J. McCrae, P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano, eds. 2011. Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on the Multilingual Semantic Web (MSW 2011). CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 775. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-775/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  47. Motta, E., S. Peroni, N. Li, and M. D’Aquin. 2010. KC-Viz: A novel approach to visualizing and navigating ontologies. In Proceedings of the EKAW2010 poster and demo track, eds. J. Völker and O. Corcho. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 674. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-674/Paper191.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  48. Motta, E., P. Mulholland, S. Peroni, M. D’Aquin, J. M. Gomez-Perez, V. Mendez, and F. Zablith. 2011a. A novel approach to visualizing and navigating ontologies. In Proceedings of the 10th international semantic web conference (ISWC 2011), eds. L. Aroyo, C. Welty, H. Alani, J. Taylor, A. Bernstein, L. Kagal, N. F. Noy, and E. Blomqvist, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 7031, 470–486. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_30.Google Scholar
  49. Motta, E., S. Peroni, and M. d’Aquin. 2011b. Latest developments in KC-Viz. In Proceedings of the poster & demo track of the 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2011). URL. Accessed 30 July 2013.Google Scholar
  50. Motta, E., S. Peroni, J. M. Gómez-Pérez, M. d’Aquin, and N. Ning Li. 2012. Visualizing and navigating ontologies with KC-Viz. Ontology engineering in a networked world, eds. M. C. Suárez-ueroa, A. Gómez-Pérez, E. Motta, and A. Gangemi, 343–362. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Object Management Group. 2009. Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM) version 1.0. http://www.omg.org/spec/ODM/1.0/PDF. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  52. Object Management Group. 2011. Unified modeling language™ (UML®). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  53. Oren, E., R. Delbru, M. Catasta, R. Cyganiak, H. Stenzhorn, and G. Tummarello. 2008. Sindice.com: A document-oriented lookup index for open linked data. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 3 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1504/IJMSO.2008.021204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Palmirani, M., L. Cervone, O. Bujor, and M. Chiappetta. 2013. RAWE: An editor for rule markup of legal texts. In joint Proceedings of the 7th international rule challenge, the special track on human language technology and the 3rd RuleML doctoral consortium. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 1004. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1004/paper4.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  55. Passant, A., and P. Laublet. 2008. Towards an interlinked semantic wiki farm. In Proceedings of the 3rd semantic wiki workshop (SemWiki 2008), eds. C. Lange, S. Schaffert, H. Skaf-Molli, and M. Völkel. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 360, 1–14. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-360/paper-19.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  56. Peroni, S., E. Motta, and M. d’Aquin. 2008. Identifying key concepts in an ontology, through the integration of cognitive principles with statistical and topological measures. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asian semantic web conference (ASWC 2008), eds. J. Domingue and C. Anutariya. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Peroni, S., D. Shotton, and F. Vitali. 2012. The Live OWL documentation environment: A tool for the automatic generation of ontology documentation. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management (EKAW 2012), eds. A. ten Teije, J. Völker, S. Handschuh, H. Stuckenschmidt, M. d’Aquin, A. Nikolov, N. Aussenac-Gilles, and N. Hernandez, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 7603, 398–412. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_35.Google Scholar
  58. Peroni, S., D. Shotton, and F. Vitali. 2013. Tools for the automatic generation of ontology documentation: A task-based evaluation. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 9 (1): 21–44. doi:10.4018/jswis.2013010102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Plaisant, C., J. Grosjean, and B. B. Bederson. 2002. Spacetree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis 2002), 57–64. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/INFVIS.2002.1173148.Google Scholar
  60. Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and categorisation, eds. E. Rosch and B. Lloyd. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. (ISBN: 0470263778).Google Scholar
  61. Sauro, J. 2011. A practical guide to the system usability scale: Background, benchmarks & best practices. [AQ2](ISBN: 978-1461062707).Google Scholar
  62. Schaffert, S. 2006. IkeWiki: A semantic wiki for collaborative knowledge management. In Proceedings of 15th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructures for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE 2006), 388–396. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/WETICE.2006.46.Google Scholar
  63. Shneiderman, B. 1992. Tree visualization with tree-Maps: A 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics 11 (1): 92–99. doi:10.1145/102377.115768.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. Shneiderman, B. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE symposium on visual languages (VL 96), 336–343. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/VL.1996.545307.Google Scholar
  65. Sirin, E., B. Parsia, B. C. Grau, A. Kalyanpur, and Y. Katz. 2007. Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5 (2): 51–53. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Souza, K., A. Dos Santos, and S. Evangelista. 2003. Visualization of ontologies through hypertrees. In Proceedings of the Latin American conference on human-computer interaction (CLIHC 03), 251–255. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  67. Souzis, A. 2005. Building a semantic wiki. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20 (5): 87–91. doi:10.1109/MIS.2005.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sowa, J. F. 1987. Semantic networks. In Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, ed. S. C. Shapiro. New York: Wiley. (ISBN: 0471503053).Google Scholar
  69. Storey, M. A., M. A. Musen, J. Silva, C. Best, N. Ernst, R. Fergerson, and N. F. Noy. 2001. Jambalaya: Interactive visualization to enhance ontology authoring and knowledge acquisition in Protege. Presented during the K-CAP 2001 workshop on interactive tools for knowledge capture, 20 Oct 2001, Victoria, Canada. http://www.isi.edu/˜blythe/kcap-interaction/papers/storey.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  70. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage. (ISBN: 978-0803959408).Google Scholar
  71. Suárez-ueroa, M. C., A. Gómez-Pérez, E. Motta, and A. Gangemi. 2012. Ontology engineering in a networked world. Berlin: Springer. ISBN: 3642247934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tartir, S., I. B. Arpinar, M. Moore, A. P. Sheth, and B. Aleman-Meza. 2006. OntoQA: Metric-based ontology quality analysis. Presented at the workshop on knowledge acquisition from distributed, autonomous, semantically heterogeneous data and knowledge sources, 27 Nov 2005, Houston, Texas, USA. http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/library/download/OntoQA.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  73. Tejo-Alonso, C., D. Berrueta, L. Polo, and S. Fernandez. 2011. Metadata for web ontologies and rules: Current practices and perspectives. In Proceeding of the 5th interational conference on Metadata and Semantic Research (MTSR 2011), eds. E. García-Barriocanal, Z. Cebeci, M. C. Okur, and A. Öztürk. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Vrandecic, D., and M. Krötzsch. 2006. Reusing ontological background knowledge in semantic wikis. In Proceedings of the 1st semantic wiki workshop—From wiki to semantics (SemWiki 2008), eds. M. Völkel and S. Schaffert. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 206. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-206/paper2.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
  75. Všlkel, M., M. Krštzsch, D. Vrandecic, H. Haller, and R. Studer. 2006. Semantic wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2006), eds. L. Carr, D. De Roure, A. Iyengar, C. A. Goble, and M. Dahlin, 585–594. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1135777.1135863.Google Scholar
  76. Wang, T. D., and B. Parsia. 2006. Cropcircles: Topology sensitive visualization of Owl class hierarchies. In Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006), eds. I. F. Cruz, S. Decker, D. Allemang, C. Preist, D. Schwabe, P. Mika, M. Uschold, and L. Aroyo, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4273, 695–708. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/11926078_50.Google Scholar
  77. Woods, W. A. 1975. What’s in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science, eds. D. Bobrow and A. Collins. New York: Academic. (ISBN: 0121085503).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations