Advertisement

Comparison of Modal Parameters Extracted Using MIMO, SIMO, and Impact Hammer Tests on a Three-Bladed Wind Turbine

  • Javad Baqersad
  • Peyman Poozesh
  • Christopher Niezrecki
  • Peter Avitabile
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

As part of a project to predict full-field dynamic strain of rotating structures (e.g. wind turbines or helicopter rotors), a validated numerical model of a structure is required. In this case, a small wind turbine was used. To understand the dynamic characteristics and validate a finite element model of a three-bladed wind turbine, several experimental modal analysis tests were conducted on the turbine attached to a 500-lb steel block. The test structure consisted of three 2.3-m blades mounted to a hub that was attached to the block using a shaft and a lathe chuck. In three separate tests, the structure was excited using a single shaker, multiple shakers, and an impact hammer; the responses of the structure to the excitations were measured using 12 triaxial accelerometers. The results reveal several very closely spaced modes present within the turbine in the test configuration. The natural frequencies and mode shapes obtained by using three different methods were compared to demonstrate the differences (e.g. strengths and weaknesses) between each excitation technique. The paper reports the results obtained and lessons learned during the experimental modal tests of the wind turbine.

Keywords

Experimental modal analysis Mode shape Wind turbine Multiple shakers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number 1230884 (Achieving a Sustainable Energy Pathway for Wind Turbine Blade Manufacturing). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Paquette J, Laird D, Griffith DT, Rip L (2006) Modeling and testing of 9m research blades. In: 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, vol 19, pp 14569–14581Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ye Z, Ma H, Bao N, Chen Y, Ding K (2001) Structure dynamic analysis of a horizontal axis wind turbine system using a modal analysis method. Wind Eng 25(4):237–248Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    LoPiccolo J, Carr J, Niezrecki C, Avitabile P, Slattery M (2012) Validation of a finite element model used for dynamic stress-strain prediction. In: 30th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics, vol 2, pp 205–214Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deines K, Marinone T, Schultz R, Farinholt K, Park G (2011) Modal analysis and SHM investigation of CX-100 wind turbine blade. In: 29th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics, vol 5, pp 413–438Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marinone T, LeBlanc B, Harvie J, Niezrecki C, Avitabile P (2012) Modal testing of 9 m CX-100 turbine blades. In: 30th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics, vol 2, pp 351–358Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harvie J, Avitabile P (2012) Comparison of some wind turbine blade tests in various configurations. In: 30th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics, vol 2, pp 73–79Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baqersad J, Niezrecki C, Avitabile P, Slattery M (2013) Dynamic characterization of a free-free wind turbine blade assembly. In: 31th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics, pp 215–220Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avitabile P, Singhal R, Peeters B, Leuridan J (2005) Modal parameter estimation approaches for large complicated multiple reference tests (then and now). In: 23th IMAC, a conference and exposition on structural dynamicsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruggiero EJ, Park G, Inman DJ (2004) Multi-input multi-output vibration testing of an inflatable torus. Mech Syst Signal Process 18(5): 1187–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruggiero EJ, Inman DJ (2005) A comparison between SISO and MIMO modal analysis techniques on a membrane mirror satellite. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16(3):273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Avitabile P (2009) MODAL SPACE: if I run a shaker test with the input oblique to the global coordinate system, how do I decompose the force into the specific components in each direction? Exp Tech 33(5):11–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    [LMS Test.Lab 10A] (2009) LMS International, Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javad Baqersad
    • 1
  • Peyman Poozesh
    • 1
  • Christopher Niezrecki
    • 1
  • Peter Avitabile
    • 1
  1. 1.Structural Dynamics and Acoustic Systems LaboratoryUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations