Mobile Augmented Reality: Applications and Specific Technical Issues

  • Nehla Ghouaiel
  • Jean-Marc Cieutat
  • Jean-Pierre Jessel
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 542)

Abstract

Although man has become sedentary over time, his wish to travel the world remains as strong as ever. The aim of this paper is to show how techniques based on imagery and Augmented Reality (AR) can prove to be of great help when discovering a new urban environment and observing the evolution of the natural environment. The study’s support is naturally the Smartphone which in just a few years has become our most familiar device, which we take with us practically everywhere we go in our daily lives. In this chapter, we discuss technical issues of augmented reality. We deal especially with building recognition. Our building recognition method is based on an efficient hybrid approach, which combines the potentials of SURF features points and features lines. Our method relies on ANNS (Approximate Nearest Neighbors Search) approach, described by Muja et al. [11]. ANNS approaches are known for their speed but they are less accurate than linear algorithms. To assure an optimal trade-off between speed and accuracy, the proposed method performs a filtering step on the top of the Approximate Nearest Neighbors Search. At the last step, our method calls Hausdorff measure [15] with line models.

Keywords

Mobile Augmented Reality Building Recognition Machine Vision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Azuma, R.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(4), 355–385 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGookin, D., Brewster, S., Priego, P.: AudioBubbles: Employing Non-speech Audio to Support Tourist Wayfinding. In: Altinsoy, M.E., Jekosch, U., Brewster, S. (eds.) HAID 2009. LNCS, vol. 5763, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanbara, M., Okuma, T., Takemura, H., Yokoya, N.: A Stereoscopic Video See-through Augmented Reality System Based on Real-time Vision-based Registration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, pp. 255–262. IEEE Computer Society (March 2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hollerer, T.H., Feiner, S.K.: Mobile Augmented Reality. In: Karimi, H., Hammad, A. (eds.) Chapter Nine in book Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and Services. Taylor & Francis Books Ltd. (January 2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bimber, O., Raskar, R.: Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real andVirtual Worlds. A K Peters, Ltd. (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cieutat, J.M., Hugues, O., Ghouaiel, N.: Active Learning based on the use of Augmented Reality Outline of Possible Applications. International Journal of Computer Applications 46(20), 31–36 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proceedings of the Alvey Vision Conference, pp. 147–151 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowe, D.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, cascade _ltering approach. IJCV 60(2), 91–110 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L.: Speeded-up robust features (surf). Computer Vision Image Understanding 110(3), 346–359 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feiner, S., Macintyre, B., Höllerer, T.: A Touring Machine: Prototyping 3D Mobile Augmented Reality Systems for Exploring the Urban Environment (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muja, M., Lowe, D.G.: Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbors with Automatic Algorithm Configuration. In: VISAPP International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, pp. 331–340 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Interlando, J.C., Padilla, C.: Decoding the (41,20,10) Quadratic Residue Code Beyond its Error-Correcting Capability. Applied Mathematical Sciences 5(46), 2261–2269 (2011)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milgram, P.: A taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems E77-D(12), 1321–1329 (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., MacIntyre, B.: Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 34–47 (November 2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huttenlocher, D.P., Klanderman, G.A., Rucklidge, W.J.: Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15(9), 850–863 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sinnott, R.W.: Virtues of the Haversine. Sky and Telescope 68(2), 159–159 (1984)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bottecchia, S., Cieutat, J.-M., Merlo, C., Jessel, J.-P.: A new AR interaction paradigm for collaborative teleassistance system: the POA. Dans: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 3(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hough, I.P.V.C.: A method and means for recognizing complex patterns, U.S. Patent No. 3069654 (1962)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nieto, M., Salgado, L.: Real-time robust estimation of vanishing points through nonlinear optimization. In: IS&T/SPIE Int. Conf. on Real-Time Image and Video Processing. SPIE, vol. 7724, p. 772402 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Agarwal, A.A., Jawahar, C.V., Narayanan, P.J.: A survey of planar homography estimation techniques. Centre for Visual Information Technology, Tech. Rep. IIIT/TR/2005/12 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nehla Ghouaiel
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Cieutat
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre Jessel
    • 2
  1. 1.ESTIA-IRITBidartFrance
  2. 2.UMR 5505IRITToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations