Abstract
In this study, performances decreasing heat losses and plant costs are compared in different stage HRSG with inlet parameters of under construction power plant. Flue gas that occurred after combustion in gas turbine was in 1–3 stage HRSG, and thermal changings, produced energies, type of equipments, and effects to environment were calculated and compared when energy and exergy analyses are applied using ASPEN Plus simulation program. Result of these calculations and comparisons has reached optimum design criteria, and 3 stage HRSG is the most effective system. Additionally, exergy analysis behind energy analysis has showed that not only the amount of heat but also the quality of heat is calculated and played important role to choose suitable type of equipment. When using these results in another process, it might not be fixed with it but used method and calculations give the optimum conditions. In conclusion, energy production in combined cycle power plant will be more effective and sensitive for environment with specified and evaluated heat recovery systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kotas TJ (1985) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Anchor Brendon Ltd., Essex
Nag PK, De S (1998) Study of thermodynamic performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. Proc Inst Mech Eng A J Power Energy 212:89–95
Szargut J, Morris DR, Steward FR (1988) Exergy analysis of thermal chemical and metallurgical processes. Hemisphere Pub. Corp., New York
Huang Y-C, Hung C-I, Chen C-K (2000) Exergy analysis for a combined system of steam-injected gas turbine cogeneration and multiple-effect evaporation. Proc Inst Mech Eng A J Power Energy 214:61–73
Kakaras E, Doukelis A, Leithner R, Aronis N (2004) Combined cycle power plant with integrated low temperature heat (LOTHECO). Appl Thermal Eng 24:1677–1686
Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M (1996) Thermal design and optimization. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Cengel YA, Boles MA (2002) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
- E:
-
Exergy (MW)
- W:
-
Work (MW)
- ε:
-
Efficiency (%)
- i:
-
Inlet
- o:
-
Outlet
- d:
-
Destructed
- ph:
-
Physical
- ch:
-
Chemical
- comp:
-
Compressor
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uludağ, O., Özçelik, Z. (2014). Performance Evaluation for Different Configurated HRSGs. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)