Skip to main content

Exergetic Performance of a Low Bypass Turbofan Engine at Takeoff Condition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment

Abstract

In this article, exergetic methodology is applied for a low bypass turbofan engine at maximum power setting. The engine is a low-bypass (0.96–1) turbofan engine and its variants fitted to the 737-100/200 all comprise six low-pressure compressor (LPC) stages, seven high-pressure compressor (HPC) stages, a single HP turbine (HPT), and finally three LPT stages. At the end of the analysis, the most irreversible units in the system are found to be the combustor and the fan/LPC, with exergy loss rates of 18.7 and 2.486 MW, respectively. The exergy efficiencies of the fan/LPC, the HPC, and combustor are 0.856, 0.845, and 0.744, respectively. For the HPT and LPT, the exergy efficiencies are calculated to be 0.98 and 0.963, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boeing (2011) See also http://www.boeing.com. Accessed 15 Aug 2011]

  2. Enviro (2011) http://www.enviro.aero/Content/Upload/File/BeginnersGuide_Biofuels_Web. Accessed 5 Dec 2011

  3. IATA (2011) http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cmo/forecast_summary.html. Accessed 20 Sept 2011

  4. Lee J, Ian J, Waitz A, Brian Y, Kim C, Gregg G, Fleming L, Curtis M, Holsclaw A (2007) System for assessing aviation’s global emissions (SAGE), part 2: uncertainty assessment. Transport Res Transport Environ 12:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. USHP (2009) http://www.house.gov/transportation/aviation/02-15-06/02-15-06memo.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2009

  6. Macintosh A, Wallace L (2009) International aviation emissions to 2025: can emissions be stabilised without restricting demand? Energ Pol 37:264–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2011) Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants. Energy 36:5886–5898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ptasinski KJ, Koymans MN, Verspagen HHG (2006) Performance of the Dutch energy sector based on energy, exergy and extended exergy accounting. Energy 31:3135–3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joosung IL, Stephen P. Lukachko, Ian AW (2004) Aircraft and energy use. http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/people/waitz/publications/AircraftEnergyUse.pdf

  10. Rosen MA (2002) Assessing energy technologies and environmental impacts with the principles of thermodynamics. Appl Energ 72:427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ao Y, Gunnewiek L, Rosen MA (2008) Critical review of exergy-based indicators for the environmental impact of emissions. Int J Green Energ 5(1–2):87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dincer I, Rosen MA (1998) Worldwide perspective on energy, environment and sustainable development. Int J Green Energ Res 22:1305–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Midilli A, Dincer I (2009) Development of some exergetic parameters for PEM fuel cells for measuring environmental impact and sustainability. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:3858–3872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Midilli A, Dincer I (2010) Effects of some micro-level exergetic parameters of a PEMFC on the environment and sustainability. Int J Global Warm 2(1):65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Norberg S, Tamm G, Highley J, Rounds M, Boettner D, Arnas O (2009) Teaching thermodynamics via analysis of the west point power plant. Int J Green Energ 6(3):230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aydın H, Turan O, Midilli A, Karakoç TH (2012) Exergetic and exergo-economic analysis of a turboprop engine: a case study for CT7-9C. Int J Exergy 11(1):69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aydın H, Turan O, Midilli A, Karakoç TH (2012b) Component-based exergetic measures of an experimental turboprop/turboshaft engine for propeller aircrafts and helicopters. Int J Exergy 11(N3):322–348

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ballı O, Aras H, Hepbaslı A (2008) Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of an aircraft jet engine (AJE). Int J Exergy 5(6):567–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bejan A, Siems DL (2001) The need for exergy analysis and thermodynamic optimization in aircraft development. Int J Exergy 1(1):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brilliant HM (1995) Second law analysis of present and future turbine engines, AIAA Paper, 95–3030, July

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cesare T, Paolo AR, Luiz F, Oliveira SDJ (2010) Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a turbofan engine during a typical commercial flight. Energy 35:952–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Diango A, Perilhon C, Descombes G, Danho E (2011) Application of exergy balances for the optimization of non-adiabatic small turbomachines operation. Energy 36:2924–2936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Etele J, Rosen MA (2001) Sensitivity of exergy efficiencies of aerospace engines to reference environmental selection. Int J Exergy 1(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Figliola RS, Tipton R, Li H (2003) Exergy approach to decision-based design of integrated aircraft thermal systems. J Aircraft 40(1):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Riggins DW (1996) High-speed engine/component performance assessment using exergy and thrust-based methods, NASA-CR-198271, January

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roth BA, Mavris DN (2000) A comparison of thermodynamic loss models applied to the J79 Turbojet Engine. Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 36th, Huntsville, July, AL, pp 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roth B, Mavris D (2001) A work availability perspective of turbofan engine performance. AIAA publication, No. 0391

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schiffmann J, Favrat D (2010) Design, experimental investigation and multi-objective optimization of a small-scale radial compressor for heat pump applications. Energy 35:436–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Turan O (2012) Effect of reference altitudes for a turbofan engine with the aid of specific-exergy based method. Int J Exergy 11(2):252–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Turan O (2012) Exergetic effects of some design parameters on the small turbojet engine for unmanned air vehicle applications. Energy 46:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Balkan F, Colak N, Hepbasli A (2005) Performance evaluation of a triple effect evaporator with forward feed using exergy analysis. Int J Green Energ Res 29:455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dincer I, Hussain MM, Al-Zaharnah I (2004) Energy and exergy use in public and private sector of Saudi Arabia. Energ Pol 32(141):1615–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wall G (2003) Exergy tools. Proc IME J Power Energ 217:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hammond GP, Stapleton AJ (2001) Exergy analysis of the United Kingdom energy system. Proc IME J Power Energ 215(2):141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hammond GP (2007) Industrial energy analysis, thermodynamics and sustainability. Appl Energ 84:675–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hepbasli A (2008) A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 12:593–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hermann WA (2006) Quantifying global exergy resources. Energy 31(12):1685–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kilkis IB (1999) Utilization of wind energy in space heating and cooling with hybrid. Energ Build 30:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Genoud S, Lesourd JB (2009) Characterization of sustainable development indicators for various power generation technologies. Int J Green Energ 6(3):257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Szargut JM, Morris DR, Steward FR (1988) Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical and metallurgical processes. Hemisphere, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kotas TJ (1995) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, Reprintth edn. Krieger, Malabar, FL

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cornelissen RL (1997) Thermodynamics and sustainable development: the use of exergy analysis and the reduction of irreversibility. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  43. Farokhi S (2009) Aircraft propulsion. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  44. EADS 2012. Preliminary aircraft evaluation for saseb, blm national aviation office, technical review

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their appreciation to TUSAS Engine Industries (TEI) in Eskisehir city of Turkey for full support throughout the preparation of this study. They are also grateful for the support provided for the present work by Anadolu University, Eskisehir and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onder Turan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

c p :

Specific heat (kJ (kg K)−1)

E :

Energy rate (MW)

ex:

Specific exergy (kJ kg−1)

\( \dot{E}x \) :

Exergy rate (MW)

f:

Fuel-air ratio; fuel exergy factor

hPR :

Fuel heating value (kJ kg−1)

H:

Enthalpy (kJ)

I:

Irreversibility rate (kW)

ke:

Kinetic energy

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate (kg s−1)

A:

Area (m2)

MA :

Molecular weight

pe:

Potential energy

P:

Pressure (bar or kPa); product exergy

R:

Specific gas constant (kJ (kg K−1)), diameter (m)

S:

Entropy (kJ K−1)

T:

Temperature (K)

\( \dot{W} \) :

Work rate (MW)

η :

Efficiency

ρ:

Air density (kg m−3)

a:

Air

ch:

Chemical

dest:

Destruction

f:

Fuel

gen:

Generated

k:

kth component

LPC:

Low-pressure compressor

HPC:

High-pressure compressor

LPT:

Low-pressure turbine

HPT:

High-pressure turbine

in:

Inlet

ke:

Kinetic energy

LD:

Loss and destruction

kn:

Kinetic

out:

Outlet

per:

Perfect

ph:

Physical

pe:

Potential energy

tot:

Total

A:

Area, m2

cp :

Specific heat, J kg−1 °C

h:

Heat transfer coefficient, W m−2 °C

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aydın, H., Turan, O., Midilli, A., Karakoc, T.H. (2014). Exergetic Performance of a Low Bypass Turbofan Engine at Takeoff Condition. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics