Abstract
In this article, exergetic methodology is applied for a low bypass turbofan engine at maximum power setting. The engine is a low-bypass (0.96–1) turbofan engine and its variants fitted to the 737-100/200 all comprise six low-pressure compressor (LPC) stages, seven high-pressure compressor (HPC) stages, a single HP turbine (HPT), and finally three LPT stages. At the end of the analysis, the most irreversible units in the system are found to be the combustor and the fan/LPC, with exergy loss rates of 18.7 and 2.486 MW, respectively. The exergy efficiencies of the fan/LPC, the HPC, and combustor are 0.856, 0.845, and 0.744, respectively. For the HPT and LPT, the exergy efficiencies are calculated to be 0.98 and 0.963, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boeing (2011) See also http://www.boeing.com. Accessed 15 Aug 2011]
Enviro (2011) http://www.enviro.aero/Content/Upload/File/BeginnersGuide_Biofuels_Web. Accessed 5 Dec 2011
IATA (2011) http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cmo/forecast_summary.html. Accessed 20 Sept 2011
Lee J, Ian J, Waitz A, Brian Y, Kim C, Gregg G, Fleming L, Curtis M, Holsclaw A (2007) System for assessing aviation’s global emissions (SAGE), part 2: uncertainty assessment. Transport Res Transport Environ 12:381–395
USHP (2009) http://www.house.gov/transportation/aviation/02-15-06/02-15-06memo.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2009
Macintosh A, Wallace L (2009) International aviation emissions to 2025: can emissions be stabilised without restricting demand? Energ Pol 37:264–273
Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2011) Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants. Energy 36:5886–5898
Ptasinski KJ, Koymans MN, Verspagen HHG (2006) Performance of the Dutch energy sector based on energy, exergy and extended exergy accounting. Energy 31:3135–3144
Joosung IL, Stephen P. Lukachko, Ian AW (2004) Aircraft and energy use. http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/people/waitz/publications/AircraftEnergyUse.pdf
Rosen MA (2002) Assessing energy technologies and environmental impacts with the principles of thermodynamics. Appl Energ 72:427–441
Ao Y, Gunnewiek L, Rosen MA (2008) Critical review of exergy-based indicators for the environmental impact of emissions. Int J Green Energ 5(1–2):87–104
Dincer I, Rosen MA (1998) Worldwide perspective on energy, environment and sustainable development. Int J Green Energ Res 22:1305–1321
Midilli A, Dincer I (2009) Development of some exergetic parameters for PEM fuel cells for measuring environmental impact and sustainability. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:3858–3872
Midilli A, Dincer I (2010) Effects of some micro-level exergetic parameters of a PEMFC on the environment and sustainability. Int J Global Warm 2(1):65–80
Norberg S, Tamm G, Highley J, Rounds M, Boettner D, Arnas O (2009) Teaching thermodynamics via analysis of the west point power plant. Int J Green Energ 6(3):230–244
Aydın H, Turan O, Midilli A, Karakoç TH (2012) Exergetic and exergo-economic analysis of a turboprop engine: a case study for CT7-9C. Int J Exergy 11(1):69–88
Aydın H, Turan O, Midilli A, Karakoç TH (2012b) Component-based exergetic measures of an experimental turboprop/turboshaft engine for propeller aircrafts and helicopters. Int J Exergy 11(N3):322–348
Ballı O, Aras H, Hepbaslı A (2008) Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of an aircraft jet engine (AJE). Int J Exergy 5(6):567–581
Bejan A, Siems DL (2001) The need for exergy analysis and thermodynamic optimization in aircraft development. Int J Exergy 1(1):14–24
Brilliant HM (1995) Second law analysis of present and future turbine engines, AIAA Paper, 95–3030, July
Cesare T, Paolo AR, Luiz F, Oliveira SDJ (2010) Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a turbofan engine during a typical commercial flight. Energy 35:952–959
Diango A, Perilhon C, Descombes G, Danho E (2011) Application of exergy balances for the optimization of non-adiabatic small turbomachines operation. Energy 36:2924–2936
Etele J, Rosen MA (2001) Sensitivity of exergy efficiencies of aerospace engines to reference environmental selection. Int J Exergy 1(2):91–99
Figliola RS, Tipton R, Li H (2003) Exergy approach to decision-based design of integrated aircraft thermal systems. J Aircraft 40(1):49–55
Riggins DW (1996) High-speed engine/component performance assessment using exergy and thrust-based methods, NASA-CR-198271, January
Roth BA, Mavris DN (2000) A comparison of thermodynamic loss models applied to the J79 Turbojet Engine. Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 36th, Huntsville, July, AL, pp 16–19
Roth B, Mavris D (2001) A work availability perspective of turbofan engine performance. AIAA publication, No. 0391
Schiffmann J, Favrat D (2010) Design, experimental investigation and multi-objective optimization of a small-scale radial compressor for heat pump applications. Energy 35:436–450
Turan O (2012) Effect of reference altitudes for a turbofan engine with the aid of specific-exergy based method. Int J Exergy 11(2):252–270
Turan O (2012) Exergetic effects of some design parameters on the small turbojet engine for unmanned air vehicle applications. Energy 46:51–61
Balkan F, Colak N, Hepbasli A (2005) Performance evaluation of a triple effect evaporator with forward feed using exergy analysis. Int J Green Energ Res 29:455–470
Dincer I, Hussain MM, Al-Zaharnah I (2004) Energy and exergy use in public and private sector of Saudi Arabia. Energ Pol 32(141):1615–1624
Wall G (2003) Exergy tools. Proc IME J Power Energ 217:125–136
Hammond GP, Stapleton AJ (2001) Exergy analysis of the United Kingdom energy system. Proc IME J Power Energ 215(2):141–162
Hammond GP (2007) Industrial energy analysis, thermodynamics and sustainability. Appl Energ 84:675–700
Hepbasli A (2008) A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 12:593–661
Hermann WA (2006) Quantifying global exergy resources. Energy 31(12):1685–1702
Kilkis IB (1999) Utilization of wind energy in space heating and cooling with hybrid. Energ Build 30:147–153
Genoud S, Lesourd JB (2009) Characterization of sustainable development indicators for various power generation technologies. Int J Green Energ 6(3):257–267
Szargut JM, Morris DR, Steward FR (1988) Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical and metallurgical processes. Hemisphere, New York
Kotas TJ (1995) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, Reprintth edn. Krieger, Malabar, FL
Cornelissen RL (1997) Thermodynamics and sustainable development: the use of exergy analysis and the reduction of irreversibility. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands
Farokhi S (2009) Aircraft propulsion. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
EADS 2012. Preliminary aircraft evaluation for saseb, blm national aviation office, technical review
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to express their appreciation to TUSAS Engine Industries (TEI) in Eskisehir city of Turkey for full support throughout the preparation of this study. They are also grateful for the support provided for the present work by Anadolu University, Eskisehir and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
- c p :
-
Specific heat (kJ (kg K)−1)
- E :
-
Energy rate (MW)
- ex:
-
Specific exergy (kJ kg−1)
- \( \dot{E}x \) :
-
Exergy rate (MW)
- f:
-
Fuel-air ratio; fuel exergy factor
- hPR :
-
Fuel heating value (kJ kg−1)
- H:
-
Enthalpy (kJ)
- I:
-
Irreversibility rate (kW)
- ke:
-
Kinetic energy
- \( \dot{m} \) :
-
Mass flow rate (kg s−1)
- A:
-
Area (m2)
- MA :
-
Molecular weight
- pe:
-
Potential energy
- P:
-
Pressure (bar or kPa); product exergy
- R:
-
Specific gas constant (kJ (kg K−1)), diameter (m)
- S:
-
Entropy (kJ K−1)
- T:
-
Temperature (K)
- \( \dot{W} \) :
-
Work rate (MW)
- η :
-
Efficiency
- ρ:
-
Air density (kg m−3)
- a:
-
Air
- ch:
-
Chemical
- dest:
-
Destruction
- f:
-
Fuel
- gen:
-
Generated
- k:
-
kth component
- LPC:
-
Low-pressure compressor
- HPC:
-
High-pressure compressor
- LPT:
-
Low-pressure turbine
- HPT:
-
High-pressure turbine
- in:
-
Inlet
- ke:
-
Kinetic energy
- LD:
-
Loss and destruction
- kn:
-
Kinetic
- out:
-
Outlet
- per:
-
Perfect
- ph:
-
Physical
- pe:
-
Potential energy
- tot:
-
Total
- A:
-
Area, m2
- cp :
-
Specific heat, J kg−1 °C
- h:
-
Heat transfer coefficient, W m−2 °C
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aydın, H., Turan, O., Midilli, A., Karakoc, T.H. (2014). Exergetic Performance of a Low Bypass Turbofan Engine at Takeoff Condition. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)