Skip to main content

Acting to Know: A Virtue of Experimentation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtue Epistemology Naturalized

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 366))

  • 1424 Accesses

Abstract

We often act in order to know. One celebrated instance of this is scientific experimentation, but as epistemic acts experiments in science have a lot in common with a variety of everyday activities, such as asking for the time or wiping your glasses. The important feature is that the act succeeds only if knowledge results. Capacities of doing this well are thus both epistemic and practical virtues. In this paper I explore one central virtue of experimentation, which I eventually name the virtue of experiment-shopping. It is the virtue of knowing if an experiment is worth performing, and although some obvious examples of it are found in scientific practice, I believe it is important throughout our intellectual lives. To call this capacity a virtue is to link it to a particular kind of success, that of coming to know if an experiment is the one to carry out. You can also say that if the virtue is used then the determination whether to carry out the experiment is arrived at well, as long as you don’t build into this any ideas of its following any particular rational method. All I mean is that it is sensitive to the factors that make experiments achieve their ends or fail. In the last section of the paper I connect the virtue to intellectual virtues in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achinstein, Peter. 2001. The book of evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Ruth. 1996. Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, Abrol. 2012. Duhem-Quine virtue epistemology. Synthese 184: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. 2010. Pragmatic encroachment. In The Routledge companion to epistemology, ed. D. Pritchard and S. Bernecker, 558–568. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink Zeno, and Daston Lorraine. 1990. The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert. 1973. Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kvanvig, Jonathan. 2003. The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Adam. 1990. Disasters and Dilemmas: strategies for real-life decision-making. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Adam. 2004. Epistemic virtues, metavirtues, and computational complexity. Nous 38: 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Adam. 2012a. Accomplishing accomplishment. Acta Analytica 27(1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Adam. 2012b. Bounded thinking: Intellectual virtues for limited agents. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radder, Hans. 1996. In and about the world: philosophical studies of science and technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, Ernest. 2007. A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. 2003. Experimentation, causal inference, and instrumental realism. In The philosophy of scientific experimentation, ed. H. Radder, 82–118. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, Linda. 1996. Virtues of the mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Morton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morton, A. (2014). Acting to Know: A Virtue of Experimentation. In: Fairweather, A. (eds) Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Synthese Library, vol 366. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics