Advertisement

A Winding Road from “Likes” to Votes

The Role of Social Media in the 2013 Czech Presidential Elections
  • Václav Štětka
  • Alena Macková
  • Marta Fialová
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 13)

Abstract

This case study analyzes the use of social media in the campaign for the historically first direct presidential elections in the Czech Republic in January 2013. Following a brief outline of the political context and outcomes of the elections, this study explores and compares the strategies of campaign communication of the nine presidential candidates on the social networking sites Facebook and Twitter. Apart from mapping the dynamics of the campaign and the responsiveness of Facebook and Twitter users, we have used content analysis to examine basic formal characteristics of over 1,000 messages posted on Facebook in the course of the campaign by the candidates and their teams. Additionally, this chapter also examines more closely the place of social media in the campaign of Karel Schwarzenberg, the eventual runner-up of the presidential race, whose team distanced all other candidates in both the extent as the level of sophistication of communication carried via the social networking sites. Overall, the presidential elections have revealed both the potential as well as limits of electoral mobilization through social networks, while at the same time it has demonstrated the continuing importance of more traditional means of campaign communication in the Czech Republic.

Keywords

Social media Election campaign Czech Republic Online mobilization Political marketing 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Research for this chapter was conducted as part of the project VITOVIN (CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0184), which is financed by the European Social Fund and the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic.

References

  1. Baumgartner, J. C. (2007). Humor on the next frontier: Youth, online political humor, and the JibJab effect. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. (2010). MyFaceTube politics: social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(24), 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cogburn, D. L., & Espinoza-Vasquez, F. K. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2), 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Effing, R., Hillegersberg, J. van, & Huibers, T. (2011). Social media and political participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic Participation (pp. 25–35). Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_3.
  5. Eibl, O., Gregor, M., Macková, A. (2013) Kampaně před prezidentskou volbou. In: Šedo, J. (eds) České prezidentské volby 2013. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.Google Scholar
  6. Elmer, G. (2012). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society, 15(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandes, J., Giurcanu, M., Bowers, K. W., & Neely, J. C. (2010). The writing on the wall: A content analysis of college students’ Facebook groups for the 2008 presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 653–675. doi: 10.1080.15205436.2010.516865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibson, R. (2013). Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning. Party Politics, published online before printing 1–15, doi: 10.1177.135406881247.5.5
  9. Graham, T., Jackson, D., Broersma, M. (2013). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. Paper presented at the ECREA Political Communication Section Conference “New Trends in Political Communication: Evidence, theories, implications, opportunities,” 19–20 September 2013, Milan.Google Scholar
  10. Greyes, N. (2011). The untapped potential of social media: A primer for savvy campaigners. Campaigns and Elections, 300, 45–47.Google Scholar
  11. Gueorguieva, V. (2008). Voters, Myspace, and Youtube the impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gustafsson, N. (2012). The subtle nature of facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1111–1127. doi: 10.1177.146144481243.5.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Junco, R. (2013). Inequalities in Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2328–2336. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jungherr, A. (2012). The German federal election of 2009: The challenge of participatory cultures in political campaigns. Transformative Works and Cultures, 5(10).Google Scholar
  15. Kirk, R., & Schill, D. (2011). A digital agora: Citizen participation in the 2008 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(3), 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larsson, A. O., & Hallvard, M. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larsson, A. O., & Hallvard, M. (2013). Representation or participation? Twitter use during the 2011 Danish election campaign. Javnost—The Public, 20(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  18. Lilleker, D. G., & Jackson, N. A. (2010). Towards a more participatory style of election campaigning: The impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 general election. Policy & Internet, 2(3), 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macková, A., Fialová, M., & Štětka, V. (2013). Nová média jako nástroj politické kampaně v České republice: případová studie krajských a senátních voleb 2012. Vol: Politologický časopis. 4/2013.Google Scholar
  20. Matušková, A. (2009) Volby 2006 - Volební strategie a využívání politického marketingu v České republice. Dissertation, Masaryk University in Brno.Google Scholar
  21. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Retrieved April 3, 2013, from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
  23. Poster, M. (1995). CyberDemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. Retrieved March 31, 2013, from http://www.hnet.uci.edu/mposter/writings/democ.html
  24. Strandberg, K. (2013). A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The Use of social media in the 2011 finnish parliamentary elections. New Media & Society, online. Retrieved March 31, 2013 from http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/01/13/1461444812470612
  25. Street, J. (2004). Celebrity politicians: Popular culture and political representation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(4), 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stromer-Galley, J. (2003) Diversity of political conversation on the internet: Users’ perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.html
  27. Zittel, T. (2004). Political communication and electronic democracy: American exceptionalism or global trend? In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 231–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Václav Štětka
    • 1
  • Alena Macková
    • 2
  • Marta Fialová
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Communication Studies and JournalismCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Masaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations