Abstract
Given its relative low-cost, speed and versatility, incremental sheet metal forming promises to introduce new ways in which architectural sheet metal cladding components are designed, prototyped and fabricated. Expanding on research done on this fabrication method, this work aims to study Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) and Double-Sided Incremental Forming (DSIF) as a viable option to produce highly customized, performative architectural skins. Utilizing the reconfigurable potentials of robotic arms’ versatile tooling, multi-axial positioning, and simultaneous programming, new methods are integrated into the forming process for structuring, verifying and articulating parametric parts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Durante M, Formisano A, Langella A (2010) Comparison between analytical and experimental roughness values of components created by incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 210(14):1934–1941
Eekhout M (2008) Material experiments in design and build. In: Kolarevic B, Klinger K (eds) Manufacturing material effects: rethinking design and making in architecture. Routledge, New York, p 236
Hensel M, Menges A (2009) Patterns in performance-oriented design. Architectural Des 79(6):89–93
Ingarao G, Ambrogio G, Gagliardi F, Lorenzo RD (2012) A sustainability point of view on sheet metal forming operations: material wasting and energy consumption in incremental forming and stamping processes. J Clean Prod 29–30:255–268
Kalo A, Newsum MJ, McGee W (2014) Performing: exploring incremental sheet metal forming methods for generating low-cost, highly customized components. In: Fabricate: Negotiating design and making. gta Verlag, Zurich, pp 166–173
Kreimeier D, Buff B, Magnus C, Smukala V, Zhu J (2011) Robot-based incremental sheet metal forming—increasing the geometrical accuracy of complex parts. Key Eng Mater 473:853–860
Maidagan E, Zettler J, Bambach M, RodrĂguez P, Hirt G (2007) A new incremental sheet forming process based on a flexible supporting die system. Key Eng Mater 344:607–614
Malhotra R, Cao J, Ren F, Kiridena V, Xia C, Reddy N (2011) Improvement of geometric accuracy in incremental forming by using a squeezing toolpath strategy with two forming tools. In: Proceedings of the ASME international manufacturing science and engineering conference, Dearborn, 30 Aug 2013, pp 603–611
Meier H, Buff B, Smukala V (2009) Robot-based incremental sheet metal forming—increasing the part accuracy in an automated, industrial forming cell. Key Eng Mater 410–411:159–166
Nørgaard T, Marie D (2010) Fog-basking behaviour and water collection efficiency in Namib Desert Darkling beetles. Front Zool 7(23):1–8. Available from: Frontiers in Zoology (30 May 2013)
Simmons M (2008) Material collaborations. In: Kolarevic B, Klinger K (eds) Manufacturing material effects: rethinking design and making in architecture. Routledge, New York, p 262
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Taubman College FabLab Director Wes McGee for his continuous and generous support. This research was supported by the Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning at the University of Michigan, in addition to the Rackham Graduate School at the University of Michigan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalo, A., Newsum, M.J. (2014). An Investigation of Robotic Incremental Sheet Metal Forming as a Method for Prototyping Parametric Architectural Skins. In: McGee, W., Ponce de Leon, M. (eds) Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04663-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04663-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04662-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04663-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)