A Rail Network Optimization Model Designed for Freight Traffic

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 262)


The freight network optimization model presented in this chapter was developed as a support tool for planning and policy decisions involved in the improvement of rail networks on a regional and national level. It is based on a strategic traffic assignment model designed to model macro networks with a high aggregation level, being exclusively designed for freight traffic. The model contemplates road and rail transport modes, and considers two different types of cargo: intermodal cargo, which is generally transported in containers and is easily interchanged between different modes at intermodal terminals; and general cargo, which represents all the remaining cargo. The optimization process is based on a local search heuristic which delivers good solutions in a reasonable computing time, with the quality of each network improvement solution being assessed based on the reduction of the total generalized costs and CO2 emissions. This freight network optimization model is innovative in the fact that it is not limited, allowing for both the improvement of existing links as well as the construction of new ones, and not having a limit on the number or variety of network improvement possibilities. Its adaptability to different conditions is emphasized when the model is applied to a network under two different investment scenarios, by delivering considerably different solutions adapted to the conditions of each scenario.


Network optimization Freight transportation Traffic assignment 



The present study was financed by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation.


  1. 1.
    Arnold, P., Peeters, D., Thomas, I.: Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system. Transp. Res. Part E 40, 255–270 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beuthe, M., Jourquin, B., Geerts, J.-F., Há, C.K.à.N.: Freight transportation demand elasticities: a geographic multimodal transportation network analysis. Transp. Res. Part E 37, 253–266 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crainic, T.G.: Service network design in freight transportation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122, 272–288 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crainic, T.G., Florian, M., Léal, J.-E.: A model for the strategic planning of national freight transportation by rail. Transp. Sci. 24(1), 1–24 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crainic, T.G., Laporte, G.: Planning models for freight transportation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 97, 409–438 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Floyd, R.W.: Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun. ACM 5(6), 345 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guélat, J., Florian, M., Crainic, T.G.: A multimode multiproduct network assignment model for strategic planning of freight flows. Transp. Sci. 24(1), 25–39 (1990)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jourquin, B.: A multi-flow multi-modal assignment procedure applied to the european freight transportation networks. Stud. Reg. Sci. 35, 929–945 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jourquin, B., Beuthe, M.: Transportation policy analysis with a geographic information system: the virtual network of freight transportation in Europe. Transp. Res. Part C 4(6), 359–371 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maia, L.C., Couto, A.F.d.: Development of a strategic freight network optimization model. In: XXV ANPET - Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes, pp. 443–453. Belo Horizonte, Brasil (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maia, L.C., Couto, A.F.d.: A new freight traffic assignment model, considering both capacity constraints and a variable perception of costs. In: 15th Meeting of the Euro Working Group on Transportation. Paris, France (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oum, T.H.: Derived demand for freight transport and inter-modal competition in canada. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 13, 149–168 (1979)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santos, B.F., Antunes, A.P., Miller, E.J.: Interurban road network planning model with accessibility and robustness objectives. Transp. Plan. Technol. 33(3), 297–313 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsamboulas, D., Moraitis, P.: Methodology for estimating freight volume shift in an international intermodal corridor. Transp. Res. Rec. 2008, 10–18 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wigan, M., Southworth, F.: Whats wrong with freight models and what should we do about it? In: Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamada, T., Russ, B.F., Castro, J., Taniguchi, E.: Designing multimodal freight transport networks: a heuristic approach and applications. Transp. Sci. 43(2), 129–143 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, G., Lu, J.: Genetic algorithm for continuous network design problem. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 7(1), 101–105 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luís Couto Maia
    • 1
  • António Fidalgo do Couto
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations