Skip to main content

Deformation Mode Selection and Orthonormalization for an Efficient Simulation of the Rolling Contact Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2030 Accesses

Abstract

The dynamic simulation of contact in rolling processes is very time-consuming. This is mainly based on the fine resolution of the surface domain of each roll, which, however, is essential in order to capture the effect of concentrated contact forces. Existing model order reduction techniques cannot be readily applied due to the nonlinear nature of the contact dynamics. In order to improve the speed of contact analysis, the present paper proposes a sophisticated combination of so-called characteristic static correction modes and vibration normal modes for describing the deformation of each roll. While the characteristic static correction modes are required to capture the concentrated nonlinear contact forces, the vibration normal modes describe the global deformation behavior of the rolls. For the computation of the characteristic static correction modes, first attachment modes are computed for a longitudinal sub-area of each roll. Then an eigenanalysis is performed on the component mode synthesis mass and stiffness matrices that correspond to the attachment modes. The resultant eigenvectors have been truncated and applied to the entire surface domain of the rolls. In order to obtain well-conditioned equations, all modes are finally orthonormalized. An example from the metal forming industry is used to demonstrate the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

M :

Mass matrix of FE model

K :

Stiffness matrix of FE model

f :

External force vector of FE model

u :

Vector of nodal DOF of FE model

u b :

Boundary DOF of FE model

u i :

Inner DOF of FE model

u c :

Potential contact DOF of FE model

u n :

DOF of set u i minus DOF of set u c

Φ n :

Fixed-interface normal modes

Ψ c :

Constraint modes

Ψ a :

Attachment modes

\( {\widehat{\boldsymbol{\varPsi}}}_{\mathrm{a}} \) :

Characteristic attachment modes

q :

Generalized coordinates of reduced model

F ESL :

Equivalent static load case matrix

References

  1. Hurty WC (1960) Vibration of structural systems by component mode synthesis. Proc Am Soc Civ Eng 85(4):51–69

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hurty WC (1965) Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA J 3(4):678–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Craig RR, Bampton MCC (1968) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J 6(7):1313–1319

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Craig RR (1995) Substructure methods in vibration. J Mech Des 117:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig RR (1987) A review of time-domain and frequency-domain component mode synthesis methods. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 2(2):59–72

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craig RR (2000) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis: an overview. In: AIAA paper no 2000-1573, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  7. Craig RR, Kurdila AJ (2006) Fundamentals of structural dynamics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Craig RR, Chang CJ (1977) Substructure coupling for dynamic analysis and testing, NASA CR-2781. National Aeronautics and space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aoyama Y, Yagawa G (2001) Component mode synthesis for large-scale structural eigenanalysis. Comput Struct 79(6):605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bourquin F (1992) Component mode synthesis and eigenvalues of second order operators: discretization and algorithm. Modél Math et Anal Numér 26(3):385–423

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourquin F, D’Hennezel F (1992) Intrinsic component mode synthesis and plate vibrations. Comput Struct 44(1–2):315–324

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouhaddi N, Lombard JP (2000) Improved free-interface substructures representation method. Comput Struct 77(3):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassis H (2000) Proposition of a new approach for the substructure method. J Sound Vib 232:659–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherif K (2013) Novel computationally efficient formulations for the equations of motion of a modally reduced flexible member undergoing large rigid body motion. Dissertation, Johannes Kepler University, Linz

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garino GC, Ponthot JP (2008) A Quasi-Coulomb model for frictional contact interfaces. Application to metal forming simulations. Latin Am Appl Res 38:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shabana A (2005) Dynamics of multibody systems, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Friberg O (1991) A method for selecting deformation modes in flexible multibody dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 32(8):1637–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherif K, Witteveen W, Mayrhofer K (2012) Quasi-static consideration of high-frequency modes for more efficient flexible multibody simulations. Acta Mech 223:1285–1305

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherif K, Witteveen W, Irschik H, Holl H, Mayrhofer K (2011) On the extension of global vibration modes with Ritz-vectors needed for local effects. In: Proulx T (ed) Linking models and experiments, vol 2. Proceedings of the 29th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics 2011, vol 4. Society of Experimental Mechanics Inc., Springer, New York, pp 37–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Support of this work in the framework of the K2-Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and the Siemens VAI Metals Technologies GmbH is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Sherif .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sherif, K., Witteveen, W. (2014). Deformation Mode Selection and Orthonormalization for an Efficient Simulation of the Rolling Contact Problem. In: Allen, M., Mayes, R., Rixen, D. (eds) Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04501-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04501-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04500-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04501-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics