Impact of RACM2, Halogen Chemistry, and Updated Ozone Deposition Velocity on Hemispheric Ozone Predictions

  • Golam SarwarEmail author
  • Jia Xing
  • James Godowitch
  • Donna Schwede
  • Rohit Mathur
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


We incorporate the Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism (RACM2) into the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) hemispheric model and compare model predictions to those obtained using the existing Carbon Bond chemical mechanism with the updated toluene chemistry (CB05TU). The RACM2 enhances monthly mean ozone by 2–10 ppbv in polluted areas compared to the CB05TU while reducing mean ozone by 2–6 ppbv in remote areas. We develop an effective halogen reaction that can consume ozone over the gulfs and oceans. The current CMAQ model uses substantially lower ozone deposition velocity over water compared to observed data. We modify the CMAQ deposition velocity to account for the enhanced deposition due to chemical interactions between ozone and oceanic iodide. The effective halogen reaction and enhanced deposition velocity reduce monthly mean ozone by 2–8 ppbv over water. The majority of the reduction occurs via the halogen reaction. A comparison of model predictions with available observed profile reveals that the RACM2 over-predicts surface ozone in polluted areas while improving the comparison in remote areas. Model predictions with the halogen chemistry and enhanced deposition velocity compare better with the observed data.


Deposition Velocity Polluted Area Compare Model Prediction Couple Modeling System Halogen Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Although this paper has been reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it does not necessarily reflect EPA’s policies or views.


  1. 1.
    Chang W et al (2004) Ozone deposition to the sea surface: chemical enhancement and wind speed dependence. Atmos Environ 38:1053–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foley KM et al (2010) Incremental testing of the CMAQ modeling system version 4.7. Geosci Model Dev 3:205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goliff WS et al (2013) The regional atmospheric chemistry mechanism, version 2. Atmos Environ 68:174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helmig D et al (2012) Atmosphere-ocean ozone fluxes during the TexAQS 2006, STRATUS 2006, GOMECC 2007, GasEx 2008 and AMMA 2008 cruises. J Geophys Res 117:D04305. doi: 10.1029/2011JD015955 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Read KA et al (2008) Extensive halogen-mediated ozone destruction over the Atlantic ocean. Nature 453:1232–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarwar G et al (2013) A comparison of atmospheric composition predicted with the carbon bond and the RACM. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 13:1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whitten G et al (2010) A new condensed toluene mechanism for carbon bond: CB05-TU. Atmos Environ 44:5346–5355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wong DC et al (2012) WRF-CMAQ two-way coupled system with aerosol feedback: software development and preliminary results. Geosci Model Dev 5:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Golam Sarwar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jia Xing
    • 1
  • James Godowitch
    • 1
  • Donna Schwede
    • 1
  • Rohit Mathur
    • 2
  1. 1.National Exposure Research LaboratoryU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  2. 2.Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis DivisionUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations