Analog-Based Postprocessing Methods for Air Quality Forecasting

  • Luca Delle MonacheEmail author
  • Irina Djalalova
  • James Wilczak
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Two new postprocessing methods based on analogs are proposed to reduce the systematic and random errors of air quality prediction. The analog of a forecast for a given location and time is defined as a past prediction that matches selected features of the current forecast. The first method is the weighted average of the observations that verified when the best analogs were valid (AN). The second method consists in applying a postprocessing algorithm inspired by the Kalman filter (KF) to AN (KFAN). The AN and KFAN are tested for ground level ozone and PM2.5 0–48 h predictions from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, with observations from 1602 surface stations from the EPA AirNow network over the continental United States for a 1-year period. Preliminary results of the new methods include a large reduction of the systematic and random errors of the direct model output, with an increase of the correlation between observations and predictions at all forecast lead times.


Kalman Filter Observational Error Good Analog Ground Level Ozone Chemistry Transport Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Delle Monache L, Nipen T, Deng X, Zhou Y, Stull RB (2006) Ozone ensemble forecasts: 2. A Kalman-filter predictor bias correction. J Geophys Res 111:D05308. doi: 10.1029/2005JD006311 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delle Monache L, Wilczak J, McKeen S, Grell G, Pagowski M, Peckham S, Stull R, McHenry J, McQueen J (2008) A Kalman-filter bias correction of ozone deterministic, ensemble-averaged, and probabilistic forecasts. Tellus 60B:238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delle Monache L, Nipen T, Liu Y, Roux G, Stull R (2011) Kalman filter and analog schemes to post-process numerical weather predictions. Mon Weather Rev 139:3554–3570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delle Monache L, Eckel T, Rife D, Nagarajan B, Searight K (2013) Probabilistic weather predictions with an analog ensemble. Mon Weather Rev 141:3498–3516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russell A, Dennis R (2000) NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling. Atmos Environ 34:2283–2324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilczak JM, McKeen SA, Djalalova I, Grell G (2006) Bias-corrected ensemble predictions of surface O3. J Geophys Res 111:D23S28. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007598 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Delle Monache
    • 1
    Email author
  • Irina Djalalova
    • 2
    • 3
  • James Wilczak
    • 3
  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)BoulderUSA
  2. 2.Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)University of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)BoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations