Advertisement

A Process Analysis of the Impact of Air-Quality/Weather Feedbacks Using GEM-MACH

  • Paul A. MakarEmail author
  • Wanmin Gong
  • Junhua Zhang
  • Jason Milbrandt
  • Sylvie Gravel
  • Balbir Pabla
  • Philip Cheung
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Environment Canada’s “Global Environmental Multiscale – Modelling Air-quality and Chemistry” (GEM-MACH) is the Canadian operational air-quality model, used to provide forecasts of ozone, PM2.5 and air-quality health metrics to the Canadian public. The operational GEM-MACH is an on-line model, but is not fully coupled, in that the chemical variables are not used to modify the weather. The model was converted to fully coupled status as part of Environment Canada’s participation in phase 2 of the Air-Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative, with three classes of modifications: (1) Additions required in order to allow feedbacks to take place between weather and chemistry; (2) Model improvements necessary to ensure feedback accuracy; (3) Model improvements to allow the use of AQMEII-2 prescribed inputs and diagnostic outputs.

The revised model is being used to generate four annual simulations of air-quality over North America, for “feedback” and “base-case” simulations for the years 2006 and 2010. Here, the initial test simulation results for 2006 of surface O3 and PM2.5 are compared using a simple statistical package, as a means of identifying cases wherein feedbacks have the greatest influence on the model’s chemical output. These instances will be put forward for further study under the multi-model framework of AQMEII-2.

Keywords

Environment Canada Synoptic Condition Code Modification Improve Model Performance Subsequent Night 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Beard KV (1976) Terminal velocity & shape of cloud and precipitation drops aloft. J Atmos Sci 22:851–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohren CF, Huffman DR (1983) Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. Wiley and Sons, Toronto, 530 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohard J-M et al (1998) Extending Twomey’s analytical estimate of nucleated cloud droplet concentrations from CCN spectra. J Atmos Sci 55:3348–3357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Côté J et al (1998) The operational CMC-MRB global environmental multiscale (GEM) model. Part 1: design considerations and formulation. Mon Weather Rev 126:1373–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gong W et al (2006) Cloud processing of gases and aerosols in a regional air quality model (AURAMS). Atmos Res 82:248–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gong W et al (2012) Impact of aerosol activation on modelled regional particulate matter mass and size distribution due to cloud processing. In: Steyn DG, Timmermans R (eds) Air pollution modelling and its application XXII. Springer, Dordrecht, in pressGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li J, Barker HW (2005) A radiation algorithm with correlated-k distribution. Part I: local thermal equilibrium. J Atmos Sci 62:286–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ménard S et al (2013) Current and future developments in numerical air quality forecasting in Canada, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milbrandt JA, Yau MK (2005) A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: a proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J Atmos Sci 62(9):3065–3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. Makar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wanmin Gong
    • 1
  • Junhua Zhang
    • 1
  • Jason Milbrandt
    • 2
  • Sylvie Gravel
    • 3
  • Balbir Pabla
    • 1
  • Philip Cheung
    • 1
  1. 1.Air Quality Research DivisionEnvironment CanadaTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Recherche en Prévision NumériqueEnvironment CanadaDorvalCanada
  3. 3.Air Quality Research DivisionEnvironment CanadaDorvalCanada

Personalised recommendations