Abstract
Agile methodologies have impact not only on coding, but also on requirements engineering activities. In the paper agile requirements engineering is examined from the research point of view. It is claimed that use cases are a better tool for requirements description than user stories as they allow zooming through abstraction levels, can be reused for user manual generation, and when used properly can provide quite good effort estimates. Moreover, as it follows from recent research, parts of use cases (namely event descriptions) can be generated in an automatic way. Also the approach to non-functional requirements can be different. Our experience shows that they can be elicited very fast and can be quite stable.
Keywords
- Requirements engineering
- agility
- use cases
- non-functional requirements
- effort estimation
- user manual
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications. IEEE Std 830-1998, pp. 1–40 (1998)
Adolph, S., Bramble, P.: Patterns for Effective Use Cases. Addison Wesley, Boston (2002)
Albrecht, A.J.: Measuring application development productivity. In: Proceedings of the Joint SHARE/GUIDE/IBM Application Development Symposium, pp. 83–92 (October 1979)
Alchimowicz, B., Jurkiewicz, J., Ochodek, M., Nawrocki, J.: Building benchmarks for use cases. Computing and Informatics 29(1), 27–44 (2010)
Alchimowicz, B., Nawrocki, J.: Generating syntax diagrams from regular expressions. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 36(2), 81–97 (2011)
Beck, K., Andres, C.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional (2004)
Bjarnason, E., Wnuk, K., Regnell, B.: A case study on benefits and siede-effects of agile practices in large-scale requirements engineering. In: Agile Requirements Engineering Workshop, Agile RE 2011, pp. 9–13. ACM (2011)
Cao, L., Ramesh, B.: Agile requirements engineering practices: An empirical study. IEEE Software 25(1), 60–67 (2008)
Cleland-Huang, J.: Quality Requirements and their Role in Successful Products. In: IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conf., pp. 361–361. IEEE (October 2007)
Cleland-Huang, J., Czauderna, A., Keenan, E.: A persona-based approach for exploring architecturally significant requirements in agile projects. In: Doerr, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) REFSQ 2013. LNCS, vol. 7830, pp. 18–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Cockburn, A.: Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison Wesley, Boston (2000)
Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City (2004)
Haugen, N.C.: An empirical study of using planning poker for user story estimation. In: Agile Conference, pp. 25–34. IEEE (2006)
ISO. ISO/IEC 25010:2011 - Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2011)
Jacobson, I.: Object-Oriented Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley (1992)
Jurkiewicz, J., Nawrocki, J., Ochodek, M., Glowacki, T.: HAZOP-based identification of events in use cases. an empirical study. Empirical Software Engineering (2013) (accepted for publication), doi:10.1007/s10664–013–9277–5
Karner, G.: Metrics for objectory. No. LiTH-IDA-Ex-9344:21. Master’s thesis, University of Linköping, Sweden (1993)
Kopczyńska, S., Maćkowiak, M., Nawrocki, J.: Structured meetings for non-functional requirements elicitation. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 36(1), 35–56 (2011)
Leveson, N.G., Turner, C.S.: An investigation of the therac-25 accidents. Computer 26(7), 18–41 (1993)
Mahnič, V., Hovelja, T.: On using planning poker for estimating user stories. Journal of Systems and Software 85(9), 2086–2095 (2012)
Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18(6), 483–497 (1992)
Nawrocki, J.R., Olek, Ł.: UC workbench – A tool for writing use cases and generating mockups. In: Baumeister, H., Marchesi, M., Holcombe, M. (eds.) XP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3556, pp. 230–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Nuseibeh, B.: Ariane 5: Who dunnit? IEEE Software 14(3), 15–16 (1997)
Ochodek, M., Alchimowicz, B., Jurkiewicz, J., Nawrocki, J.: Improving the reliability of transaction identification in use cases. Information and Software Technology 53(8), 885–897 (2011)
Ochodek, M., Nawrocki, J.: Automatic transactions identification in use cases. In: Meyer, B., Nawrocki, J.R., Walter, B. (eds.) CEE-SET 2007. LNCS, vol. 5082, pp. 55–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Ochodek, M., Nawrocki, J.: Enhancing use-case-based effort estimation with transaction types. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 35(2), 91–106 (2010)
Ochodek, M., Nawrocki, J., Kwarciak, K.: Simplifying effort estimation based on Use Case Points. Information and Software Technology 53(3), 200–213 (2011)
OMG. OMG Unified Modeling LanguageTM(OMG UML), superstructure, version 2.3 (May 2010)
Redmill, F., Chudleigh, M., Catmur, J.: System safety: HAZOP and software HAZOP. Wiley (1999)
Schwaber, K.: Scrum development process. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, pp. 117–134 (1995)
Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prentice Hall (2001)
Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In: Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262. IEEE (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nawrocki, J., Ochodek, M., Jurkiewicz, J., Kopczyńska, S., Alchimowicz, B. (2014). Agile Requirements Engineering: A Research Perspective. In: Geffert, V., Preneel, B., Rovan, B., Štuller, J., Tjoa, A.M. (eds) SOFSEM 2014: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8327. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04298-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04298-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04297-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04298-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)