Skip to main content

Government Austerity in Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Government Austerity and Socioeconomic Sustainability

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

Abstract

Various general categories of austerity measures as well as the specific policy actions adopted by a sample set of countries are summarized for highlighting relevant dimensions of socioeconomic sustainability that are affected or potentially influenced for years into the future. The specific government austerity measures including reductions in public spending on social programs suggest lack sufficient attention to the imperatives of socioeconomic sustainability requirements in this context. Substantial reforms are called for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonakakis, N. (2013). Fiscal Austerity, unemployment and suicide rates in Greece, Munich: MPRA Paper #45198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. (2010). The UK swallows austerity so we don’t have to. Retrieved October 25, 2010, from www.Huffingtonpost.com

  • Cahill, K. M. (Ed.). (2012). More with less: disasters in an era of diminishing resources. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, O. D., et al. (2010). Disaster risk from a macroeconomic perspective: a metric for fiscal vulnerability evaluation. Disasters, 34, 1064–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S., Stuckler, D., Yip, P., & Gunnell, D. (2013). Impact of 2008 global economic crisis on suicide: time trend study in 54 countries. British Medical Journal BMJ, 347. Retrieved September 17, 2013 from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5239

  • Corsetti, G. (2013). Introduction. In G. Corsetti (Ed.), Austerity: Too Much of a Good Thing? A VoxEU.org eCollection of views by leading economists, Centre for Economic Policy Research, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faux, J. (1988). The austerity trap and the growth alternative. World Policy Journal, 5, 367–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guajardo, J., Leigh, D., & Pescatori, A. (2011). Expansionary austerity: New international evidence. IMF Working Paper WP/11/158, Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamza, M., & Zetter, R. (1998). Structural adjustment, urban systems, and disaster vulnerability in developing countries. Cities, 15, 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, A., & Lierse, H. (2011a). The effects of European austerity programmes on social security systems. Modern Economy, 2, 498–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesie, A., & Lierse, H. (2011b). Budget consolidation and the European social model. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2010). Strategies for fiscal consolidation in the post-crisis world. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Special Report of the IPCC, Geneva, IPCC Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanikolos, M et al. (2013). Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. www.thelancet.com Retrieved March 27, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60102-6

  • Kyrili, K., & Martin, M. (2010). The impact of the global economic crisis on the budgets of low-income countries. Oxford: Oxfam International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapavitsas, C et al. (2010). The Eurozone between austerity and default. RMF Occasional Report. www.researchonmoneyandfinance.org

  • Lapavitsas, C et al. (2011). Breaking up? a route out of the economic crisis. RMF Occasional Report #3. www.researchonmoneyandfinance.org

  • López, A. (2013). Spanish government announces more austerity as unemployment soars. http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/04/27/spai-a27.html

  • Lis, E. M., & Nickel, C. (2009). The impact of extreme weather events on budget balances and implications for fiscal policy. Working Paper 1055, Frankfurt, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. (2012). Austerity’s greatest failure. The Atlantic, April 2012. www.theatlantic.com

  • OECD. (2007). What promotes fiscal consolidation: OECD country experiences. Economics Department Working Paper # 553, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, I., Chai, J., Cummins, M., & Vergara, G. (2010). Prioritizing expenditures for a recovery for all: A rapid review of public expenditures in 126 developing countries. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, L., Clay, E., & Braunholz, T. (2011). Natural disasters: What is the role for social safety nets? World Bank social protection dscussion paper #1102. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. K. (2000). Sustainable development: Economics and policy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckler, D., Basu, S., Suhrcke, M., Coutts, A., & McKee, M. (2009). Public health effect of economic crisis and alternative policy responses in Europe: an empirical analysis. Lancet, 374, 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodoropoulou, S., & Watt, A. (2011). Withdrawal symptoms: An assessment of the austerity packages in Europe. Working Paper 2011.02, Brussels, European Trade Union Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Jr. L. (2012). Spain Is Still Awaiting the Payoff From Austerity. The New York Times, April 27. www.newyorktimes.com

  • Twigg, J., & Benson, C. (2007). Tools for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction: Guidance notes for development organizations, Geneva: IFRC / ProVention Consortium, Guidance Note # 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCSD. (2012). Disaster risk reduction and resilience building. Rio + 20 Brief #8, New York, UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2008). Integrating practices, tools and systems for climate risk assessment and management and strategies for disaster risk reduction into national policies and programmes. Bonn: UNFCCC Technical Paper FCCC/TP/2008/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2006). Hazards of nature, risks to development: An IEG evaluation of world bank assistance for natural disasters. Washington, DC, World Bank / IEG.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Rao .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rao, P.K. (2015). Government Austerity in Practice. In: Government Austerity and Socioeconomic Sustainability. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04235-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics