Advertisement

How Do Users Search with Basic HTML5 Video Players?

  • Claudiu Cobârzan
  • Klaus Schoeffmann
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8325)

Abstract

When searching within a video for a specific scene most non-expert users employ a basic video player. The main advantage of such a player over more advanced retrieval tools lies in its ease of use and familiar controls and mode of operation. This means that the available navigation controls (play, fast forward, fast reverse, seeker-bar) will be used for interactive search and browsing. We compare the search behavior by type of interaction and speed of interactive search of two groups of users, each numbering 17 participants. Both groups performed the same tasks using an HTML5 video player but in different setups: the first group performed Known Item Search tasks, while the second performed Description Based Search tasks. The goal of this study is twofold. One: better understand the way users search with a basic video player, so that useful insights can be taken into consideration when designing professional video browsing and search tools. Two: evaluate the impact of the different setups (Known Item Search vs. Description Based Search tasks).

Keywords

video search video browsing user behavior HTML5 video player 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Crockford, C., Agius, H.: An empirical investigation into user navigation of digital video using the vcr-like control set. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(4), 340–355 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, A.-H.: Effects of multimedia on document browsing and navigation: an exploratory empirical investigation. Information & Management 41(2), 189–198 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hudelist, M., Schoeffmann, K., Böszörményi, L.: Mobile Video Browsing with a 3D Filmstrip. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, pp. 299–300. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hudelist, M., Schoeffmann, K., Böszörményi, L.: Mobile Video Browsing with the ThumbBrowser. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Multimedia. ACM, Barcelona (accepted for publication 2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lux, M., Huber, J.: Why did you record this video? An exploratory study on user intentions for video production. In: 13th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (WIAMIS), pp. 1–4 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Over, P., Awad, G., Michel, M., Fiscus, J., Sanders, G., Shaw, B., Kraaij, W., Smeaton, A.-F., Quénot, G.: Trecvid 2012 – an overview of the goals, tasks, data, evaluation mechanisms and metrics. In: Proceedings of TRECVID 2012, NIST, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoeffmann, K., Bailer, W.: Video browser showdown. SIGMultimedia Rec. 4(2), 1–2 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schoeffmann, K., Cobârzan, C.: An Evaluation of Interactive Search with Modern Video Players. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 1–4. IEEE, San-Jose (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoeffmann, K., Hopfgartner, F., Marques, O., Böszörményi, L., Jose, J.-M.: Video browsing interfaces and applications: a review. SPIE Reviews 1(1), 018004 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott, D., Hopfgartner, F., Guo, J., Gurrin, C.: Evaluating novice and expert users on handheld video retrieval systems. In: Li, S., El Saddik, A., Wang, M., Mei, T., Sebe, N., Yan, S., Hong, R., Gurrin, C. (eds.) MMM 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7733, pp. 69–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudiu Cobârzan
    • 1
  • Klaus Schoeffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Alpen-Adria-Universität KlagenfurtKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations