A Crack in the Wall of Denial: The Scorpions Video in and out of the Courtroom

Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Transitional Justice book series (SSTJ, volume 8)

Abstract

The chapter scrutinizes the impact of a video of executions filmed by the Serbian unit Scorpions in the process of facing the crimes of recent past committed at the territory of former Yugoslavia. To that end, the usage of the video in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and in Serbian courtrooms is analysed in the context of the ongoing debate on didactic purposes of the trials. The afterlife of the video outside of the courtroom and its role in confronting the denial is also scrutinized in the attempt to assess its effect in changing the attitudes during post-war transition.

Keywords

War in former Yugoslavia Transitional justice ICTY Srebrenica Scorpions Serbia 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The chapter evolved in the course of a research supported by the Transitional Justice Programme of the NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Amsterdam.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem, 16, 232. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  2. Armatta, Judith. 2012. Historical revelations from the Milosevic trial. Southeastern Europe 36:10–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boas, Gideon. 2006. The Milosevic trial. lessons for the conduct of complex international criminal proceedings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bougarel, Xavier. 1996. Bosnie: Anatomie d’un conflit. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  5. Buruma, Ian. 1995. The wages of guilt: memories of war in Germany and Japan, 142. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, David. 2002. Atrocity, memory, photography: imaging the concentration camps of Bosnia—the case of ITN versus living Marxism. Journal of Human Rights 1 (1):1–33, 1 (2):143–172.Google Scholar
  7. Chuter, David. 2003. War crimes, 232–233. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Delage, Christian. 2006. La vérité par l’image, De Nuremberg au procès de Milosevic. Paris: Denoel.Google Scholar
  9. Donia, Robert. 2004. Encountering the past: history at the Yugoslav war crimes tribunal. The Journal of the International Institute 11 (2–3), (Winter-Spring/Summer 2004). http://www.umich.edu/~iinet/journal/vol11no2-3/donia.htm.
  10. Douglas, Lawrence. 1995. Film as witness: screening nazi concetration camps before the nuremberg tribunal. Yale Law Journal 105 (2): 449–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas, Lawrence. 2001. The memory of judgment. Making law and history in the trials of the holocaust, 27. New Heaven: Yale University press.Google Scholar
  12. Dulović, Jovan, and Filip Švarm. 2003. Documents on unit for special operations. Vreme no. 638 http://www.vreme.com/cms/view.php?id=336129. Accessed 27 March 2003.
  13. Gilbert, G. M. 1995. Nuremberg diary, 45–49, 161–163. New York: De Cappo Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goldstone, Richard. 2000. For humanity: reflections of a war crimes investigator, xii. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gordy, Eric. 2003. Rating the Sloba show: will justice be served? Problems of Post-Communism 50 (3): 53–63.Google Scholar
  16. Gow, James. 2003. The Serbian project and its adversaries. A strategy of war crimes. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Kaldor, Mary. 2012. New and old wars—organized violence in the globalized era, 32–70. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kerr, Rachel. 2004. The international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, an exercise in law, politics and diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nice, Geoffrey. 2004. The reality of the modern war crimes trial. In Genocide and accountability, ed. Nanci Adler, 22–38. Amsterdam: Vossius Pers.Google Scholar
  20. Osiel, Mark. 1997. Mass atrocity, collective memory and the law, 240–292. New York: Transaction Pb.Google Scholar
  21. Petrović, Vladimir. 2007. Guerrilla warfare and ethnic cleansing: Some terminological and conceptual remarks. In Guerilla in the Balkans, 219–244. Tokyo: Institute for Contemporary History.Google Scholar
  22. Petrović, Vladimir. 2013. Milošević in the Hague: Failed success of a historical trial, In Remembrance, history and justice, ed. Vladimir Tismaneanu. Washignton: 2013 in print.Google Scholar
  23. Ramet, Sabrina. 2007. The denial syndrome and its consequences: Serbian political culture since 2000. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40:42.Google Scholar
  24. Richard, Ashby Wilson. 2005. Judging history: the historical record of the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (3): 908–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodrigues, Almiro, and Cecile Tournaye. 2001. Hearsay evidence. In Essays on ICTY procedure and evidence, in honor of Gabrielle KirkMcDonald, ed. May Richard et al., 297. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenberg, Tina. 1995. The haunted land, 218. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  27. Santiago Nino, Carlos. 1996. Radical evil on trial, vii. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Scharf, Michael. 1997. Balkan justice: The story behind the first international war crimes trial since Nuremberg, 128. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shklar, Judit. 1986. Legalism: law, morals, and political trials, 145. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (1st 1964).Google Scholar
  30. Steinberg Richard, H. ed. 2011. Assesing the legacy of the ICTY. The Hague: Brill.Google Scholar
  31. Teitel, Ruti. 2000. Transitional justice, 72–73. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  32. Tesanovic, Jasmina. 2009. Skorpioni—dizajn zlocina. Beograd: VBZ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide StudiesAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations