Skip to main content

Social and Environmental Enterprises in Africa: Context, Convergence and Characteristics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Business of Social and Environmental Innovation

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the landscape of social and environmental entrepreneurship in Africa. Utilizing quantitative data on 270 social and environmental enterprises operating in Eastern and Southern Africa, some key characteristics of these kinds of enterprises are identified. These characteristics are reflected upon through a contextual lens contributing to wider debates about the nature of social and environmental entrepreneurship and enterprises in Africa. Drawing upon notions of hybridity, and sustainability oriented entrepreneurship, consideration is furthermore given to the convergence of social and environmental goals in these kinds of businesses, and in wider social and environmental innovation in Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Trickle Out Africa Research Project is funded by the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and examines social and environmental enterprises in Eastern and Southern Africa. It focuses on their role in sustainable development and poverty alleviation, and how the benefits of their activities ‘trickle out’ into communities, amongst stakeholders and along the value chain. See www.trickleout.net

  2. 2.

    In 8 % of cases the major income source was unclear, in 3 % there seems to be a roughly equal mix of donations and sales. There were 2 instances where this question was not answered.

  3. 3.

    A programme has recently been initiated in South Africa to develop a national social business and impact investment framework. This programme is supported by the British High Commission, USAID and involves various local partner organizations including the Impact Trust.

References

  • Anderson TL, Leal DR (1997) Enviro-capitalists: doing good while doing well. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacq S, Janssen F (2011) The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: a review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrep Dev Rev 23(5–6):373–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkemeyer R, Holt D, Preuss L, Tsang S (2014) What happened to the development in ‘sustainable development’? Sustain Dev 22(1):15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett SJ (1991) Ecopreneuring – the complete guide to small business opportunities from the environmental revolution. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle G (1991) The green entrepreneur: business opportunities that can save the earth and make you money. Liberty Hall Press, Blue Ridge Summit

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge R, Guy S (2005) The rise of the ecopreneur and the messy world of environmental innovation. Local Environ 10:665–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer V, Hamann R (2015) The business of social and environmental innovation. In: Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW (eds) The business of social and environmental innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bland C, Hamann C (2015) Obstacles to firms’ adoption of socially embedded approaches to BoP markets. In: Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW (eds) The business of social and environmental innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Creech H, Paas L (2008) Typologies for partnerships for sustainable development and for social and environmental enterprises: exploring SEED winners through two lenses. The SEED Initiative and International Institute for Sustainable Development, Manitoba

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin TM, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organ Sci 22(5):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin A, Lewis K (2005) Green entrepreneurship in New Zealand: a micro-enterprise focus. In: Schaper M (ed) Making ecopreneurs: developing sustainable entrepreneurship. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean TJ, Mc Mullen JS (2007) Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. J Bus Ventur 22(1):50–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees JG (2003) Social entrepreneurship is about innovation and impact, not income. SocialEdge Online. http://skoll.socialedge.org/

  • Defourny J, Nyssens M (2006) Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments. Soc Enterp J 4:202–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Domenico ML, Haugh H, Tracey P (2010) Social bricolage: theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrep Theory Prac 34(4):681–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI (2010) Social enterprise barometer. IFF Research Limited. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/s/10-1076-social-enterprise-barometer-feb-2010.pdf

  • Fischetti M (1992) Green entrepreneurs. Technol Rev 95:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach A (2001) Sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM) University of Luneburg, Luneburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes MG, McMullen JS, Vogus TJ, Miller TL (2013) Studying the origins of social entrepreneurship: compassion and the role of embedded agency. Acad Manag Rev 38(3):460–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JK, Daneke GA, Lenox MJ (2010) Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: past contributions and future directions. J Bus Ventur 25:439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann R, Methner N, Nilsson W (2015) The evolution of a sustainability leader: the development of strategic and boundary spanning organizational innovation capabilities in Woolworths. In: Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW (eds) The business of social and environmental innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson LU, Tuttle DB (1997) Dynamic management of the environmental enterprise: a qualitative analysis. J Organ Chang Manag 10:363–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt D (2011) Where are they now? Tracking the longitudinal evolution of environmental businesses from the 1990s. Bus Strateg Environ 20(4):238–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaak R (2002) The making of the ecopreneur. Greener Manag Int 38:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandachar P, Halme M (2008) Sustainability challenges and solutions at the bottom of the pyramid. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin JA (2009) Social enterprise a global comparison. University Press of New England, Lebanon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A, Rivera-Santos M, Rufín C (2014) Reviewing a decade of research on the “base/bottom of the pyramid” (BoP) concept. Bus Soc 53:338–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel P, Aitken A (2015) Key factors for the successful implementation of stakeholder partnerships: the Case of the African Cashew initiative. In: Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW (eds) The business of social and environmental innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon D, Burkett I (2004) Defining social enterprise enterprising ways to address long-term unemployment, Book one: the new mutualism series. PI Productions, Palmwoods

    Google Scholar 

  • London T, Hart SL (2010) Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: new approaches for building mutual value. FT Press, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Marti I (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. J World Bus 41(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Battilana J, Cardenas J (2012) Organizing for society: a typology of social entrepreneuring models. J Bus Ethics 111(3):353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKague K, Wheeler D, Karnani A (2015) An integrated approach to poverty alleviation: roles of the private sector, government and civil society. In: Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW (eds) The business of social and environmental innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore R (2015) From concord to conflict: a conceptual analysis of a partnership for social innovation. In: Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW (eds) The business of social and environmental innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz SA (2010) Towards a geographical research agenda for social enterprise. Area 42:302–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastakia A (2002) Assessing ecopreneurship in the context of a developing country the case of India. Greener Manag Int 38:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie K, Morley A (2008) Eight paradoxes of the social enterprise research agenda. Soc Ent J 4:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK (2004) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel H, Weber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos F (2012) A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. J Bus Ethics 111(3):335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (2002) A framework for ecopreneurship. Greener Manag Int 38:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2011) Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Bus Strateg Environ 20(4):222–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper M (2002) The essence of ecopreneurship. Greener Manag Int 38:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEED, IISD (2009) The SEED initiative. http://www.seedinit.org/. Accessed 24 Nov 2009

  • Smallbone D, Evans M, Ekanem I, Butters S (2001) Researching social enterprise. Small Business Service, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith IH, Seawright KW (2015) Social innovation through development franchising: compensating for a lack of entrepreneurial expertise and connecting to formal supply chains. In: Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW (eds) The business of social and environmental innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Enterprise London (2014) About social enterprise. http://www.socialenterprise.org.uk/about/about-social-enterprise. Accessed 7 Oct 2014

  • Sridharan S, Viswanathan M (2008) Marketing in subsistence marketplaces: consumption and entrepreneurship in a south indicant context. J Consum Mark 25:455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J, Doherty B (2006) The diverse world of social enterprise: a collection of social enterprise stories. Int J Soc Econ 33:361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2014) What we do, Development Innovation Ventures. http://idea.usaid.gov/organization/div. Accessed 7 Oct 2014

  • Volery T (2002) An entrepreneur commercialises conservation. Greener Manag Int 38:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley EE, Taylor DW (2002) Opportunists, champions, mavericks…? Greener Manag Int 38:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund J, Davidsson P, Audretsch DB, Karlsson C (2011) The future of entrepreneurship research. Enterp Theory Pract 35:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC grant reference RES-061-25-0473)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Littlewood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Littlewood, D., Holt, D. (2015). Social and Environmental Enterprises in Africa: Context, Convergence and Characteristics. In: Bitzer, V., Hamann, R., Hall, M., Griffin-EL, E. (eds) The Business of Social and Environmental Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04051-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics