Study on Factors to Adopt Mobile Payment for Tourism E-Business: Based on Valence Theory and Trust Transfer Theory

Conference paper

Abstract

By using the valence theory and trust transfer theory, this study builds a mobile payment adoption model where consumers shift the payment from tourism websites to mobile apps. The study uses structural equation model based on 323 questionnaires data to test the impact of the trust in on-line payment on initial trust in mobile payment as well as the impacts of consumers trust, and its positive and negative utilities on consumers’ behaviour intention to adopt mobile payment. The findings of the empirical study indicate that: (1) users’ trust in on-line payment via tourism website significantly impacts the initial trust in mobile payment; (2) perceived usefulness and perceived ease-of-use and consumers’ innovativeness positively and significantly impact the users’ intention to adopt mobile payment; (3) initial trust in mobile payment by increasing perceived usefulness has significant impacts on users’ intention to adopt mobile payment, both directly and indirectly.

Keywords

Tourism e-business Mobile payment Trust transfer Valence theory User’s adoption 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding support for this study: National Key Technology R&D Program “R&D and Demonstration for Application on one-stop Service Platform of Regional Tourism” (2012BAH18F05), University-level research finding “the Building and Application Research on the Website Assessment System for Travelling Destinations” (12YBGLX01).

References

  1. Bilkey, W. J. (1953). A psychological approach to consumer behaviour analysis. Journal of Marketing, 18, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilkey, W. J. (1955). Psychic tensions and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1955), 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim, G., Shin, B., & Lee, H. G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kini, A. & Choobineh. J. (1998). Trust in electronic commerce: Definition and theoretical considerations. In Proceedings of the 31th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 4, pp. 51–61).Google Scholar
  6. Kuan, H., & Bock, G. (2007). Trust transference in brick and click retailers: An investigation of the before-online-visit phase. Information and Management, 44(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee, K. C., Kang, I., & McKnight, D. H. (2007). Transfer from offline trust to key online perceptions: An empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(4), 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewin, K. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council, 108, 35–65.Google Scholar
  9. Luarn, P. & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21(6), 873–891.Google Scholar
  10. Lu, Y., Yang, S., Chau, P. Y. K., & Cao, Y. (2011). Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective. Information and Management, 48(8), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pedersen, P. (2005). Adoption of mobile internet services: An exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peter, P. J., & Tarpey, L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rogers & Shocmaker (2002). Influence of mobile commerce. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 45–62).Google Scholar
  14. Shin, D. H. (2009). Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25(6), 1343–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of International Business and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations