Measuring the Perceived Image of Lithuania Through its Destination Management Organization Website

Conference paper


It is generally acknowledged that the image of a tourist destination plays a significant role in the destination selection process. Consumers, while searching for destination information tend to choose a destination with a strong and favourable image. In order to design appropriate marketing strategies, it is therefore of paramount importance for a destination management organization (DMO) to understand what image exists in the minds of its potential consumers. In addition, it is vital to understand how the perceived image changes, depending on the communication channel being used. The following research aims to investigate how the destination image of Lithuania changed after the exposure to the DMO website. In order to carry out the research, a quasi-experimental design was used. The following research reveals that exposure to the DMO website facilitates change in one’s perception of the destination image, particularly in its cognitive and unique components. The research findings contribute to the improvement of the online marketing strategy of the Lithuania’s DMO.


Destination image Image change Lithuania Destination management organization website 


  1. Baloglu, S., & McCleary, K. W. (1999). A model of destination image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(4), 868–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastis. (2013). Destination: Lithuania. Retrieved February 16, 2013 from
  3. Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21(1), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2008). Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet—The state of eTourism research. Tourism Management, 29(4), 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  6. Cho, Y. H., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2000). A conceptual framework for evaluating effects of a virtual tour. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 2000, 314–323.Google Scholar
  7. Choi, S., Lehto, X. Y., & Morrison, A. M. (2007). Destination image representation on the web: Content analysis of Macau travel related websites. Tourism Management, 28(1), 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivation for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research, 6, 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickinger, A., Koeltringer, C., & Koerbitz, W. (2011). Comparing online destination image with conventional image measurement—the case of Tallinn. In R. Law, M. Fuchs & F. Ricci (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2011 (pp. 165–177). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. B. (1993). The measurement of destination image: An empirical assessment. Journal of Travel Research, 31(4), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. B. (2003). The meaning and measurement of destination image. Journal of Tourism Studies, 14(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  12. Fakeye, P. C., & Crompton, J. L. (1991). Image differences between prospective, first-time, and repeat visitors to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Journal of Travel Research, 30(2), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gartner, W. C. (1993). Image formation process. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 2(2/3), 191–215.Google Scholar
  14. Gallarza, M. G., Saura, I. G., & García, H. C. (2002). Destination image: Towards a conceptual framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghazali, R. M., & Cai, L. (2013). Social media sites in destination image formation. Tourism Social Science Series, 18, 73–86.Google Scholar
  16. Govers, R., & Go, F. M. (2005). Projected destination image online: Website content analysis of pictures and text. Information Technology and Tourism, 7(2), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Govers, R., Go, F. M., & Kumar, K. (2007). Virtual destination image a new measurement approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(4), 977–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gretzel, U., Fesenmaier, D. R., & O’Leary, J. T. (2006). The transformation of consumer behaviour. In D. Buhalis & C. Costa (Eds.), Tourism business frontiers: Consumers, products and industry (pp. 9–18). Burlington: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunn, C. (1972). Vacations cape: Designing tourist regions. Austin: Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, J. D. (1975). Image as a factor in tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 13, 1–7. Winter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inversini, A., Cantoni, L., & Buhalis, D. (2009). Destinations’ information competition and web reputation. Information Technology and Tourism, 11(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKay, K. J., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (1997). Pictorial element of destination in image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(3), 537–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pike, S. (2002). Destination image analysis—a review of 142 papers from 1973 to 2000. Tourism Management, 23(5), 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. San Martin, H., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. A. (2008). Exploring the cognitive–affective nature of destination image and the role of psychological factors in its formation. Tourism Management, 29(2), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tasci, A. D., & Gartner, W. C. (2007). Destination image and its functional relationships. Journal of Travel Research, 45(4), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Um, S., & Crompton, J. L. (1990). Attitude determinants in tourism destination choice. Annals of Tourism Research, 17(3), 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiang, Z., Gretzel, U., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2009). Semantic representation of tourism on the Internet. Journal of Travel Research, 47(4), 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stela Dragova
    • 1
  • Kristina Petrovskaya
    • 1
  • Roman Egger
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Applied SciencesSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations