Advertisement

Research Approach

  • Hubert Anton MoserEmail author
Chapter
  • 3.5k Downloads
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

This chapter presents the research approach to answer the main research question (How does systems thinking evolve in practice and how can this evolution be improved?). Section 3.1 starts with a refinement of the main research question. The resulting research questions are the basis for selecting an empirical research methodology including methods, strategy, and plan (Section 3.2), data collection and processing approach (Section 3.3), and analysis framework (Section 3.4) and approach (Section 3.5). Section 3.6 discusses the credibility of the chosen approach and methods. Section 3.7 concludes the chapter.

Keywords

Activity System Activity Theory System Thinking Main Research Question Knowledge Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R.S., Mann, L., Jordan, S., Daly, S.: Exploring the boundaries: language, roles and structures in cross-disciplinary design teams. In: McDonnell, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.) About: Designing. Analysing Design Meetings, 1st edn., pp. 339–358. Taylor & Francis (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S.: Understanding the use and reuse of experience in engineering design (Doctoral dissertation). Cambridge University, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S.: A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  4. Badke-Schaub, P., Frankenberger, E.: Analysing and modelling cooperative design by the critical situation method. Le Travail Humain 65(4), 293–314 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. Bednyĭ, G.Z., Karwowski, W.: A systemic-structural theory of activity: Applications to human performance and work design. CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2007)Google Scholar
  6. Belliger, A., Krieger, D.J.: Einführung in die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. In: Belliger, A., Krieger, D.J. (eds.) ANThology. Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie, pp. 13–50. Transcript, Bielefeld (2006)Google Scholar
  7. Blackler, F., Crump, N., McDonald, S.: Organizing processes in complex activity networks. Organization 7(2), 277–300 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blessing, L.T.M., Chakrabarti, A.: DRM, a Design Research Methodology, 1st edn. Springer, Guildford (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Boedker, S.: Activity theory as a challenge to systems design, Aarhus (1990)Google Scholar
  10. Boer, N.-I., van Baalen, P.J., Kumar, K.: An activity theory approach for studying the situatedness of knowledge sharing. In: IEEE (ed.) Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  11. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R.: How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Brereton, M.F., Cannon, D.M., Mabogunje, A., Leifer, L.J.: Collaboration in design teams: how social interaction shapes the product. In: Cross, N., Christiaans, H., Dorst, K. (eds.) Analysing Design Activity, pp. 319–342. Wiley, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
  13. Bucciarelli, L.L.: Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  14. Checkland, P.: Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1995)Google Scholar
  15. Checkland, P., Holwell, S.: Action Research: Its Nature and Validity. Systematic Practice and Action Research 11(1), 9–21 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collin, K.: Development engineers’ work and learning as shared practice. International Journal of Lifelong Education 27(4), 379–397 (2008), doi:10.1080/02601370802213856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.L.: Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2008)Google Scholar
  18. Davidz, H.L.: Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  19. Donnellon, A., Gray, B., Bougon, M.G.: Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. Administrative Science Quarterly 31(1), 43–55 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Engeström, Y.: Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta Konsultit Oy, Helsinki (1987)Google Scholar
  21. Engeström, Y.: Innovative learning in work teams: Analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In: Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., Punamäki, R.-L. (eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 377–404. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engeström, Y.: Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14(1), 133–156 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. Engeström, Y.: Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Lehmanns Media, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  24. Fenwick, T.: Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning 22(1/2), 104–116 (2010), doi:10.1108/13665621011012898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fetterman, D.M.: Ethnography: Step-by-step, 3rd edn. Sage, Los Angeles (2010)Google Scholar
  26. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (11. printing). Aldine, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  27. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., Paul, A.T.: Grounded theory: Strategien qualitativer Forschung, 2nd edn. Huber, Bern (2008)Google Scholar
  28. Goldschmidt, G.: The designer as a team of one. In: Cross, N., Christiaans, H., Dorst, K. (eds.) Analysing Design Activity, pp. 65–92. Wiley, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
  29. Goodwin, C.: Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science 25, 237–274 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guile, D.: Interprofessional Activity in the ’Space of Reasons’: Thinking, Communicating and Acting. Vocations and Learning 4(2), 93–111 (2011), doi:10.1007/s12186-011-9052-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hardman, J., Paucar-Caceres, A.: A Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) Based Framework for Evaluating Managed Learning Environments. Systemic Practice and Action Research (2010), doi:10.1007/s11213-010-9182-4Google Scholar
  32. Hollan, J.D., Hutchins, E.L.: Opportunities and challenges for augmented environments: a distributed cognition perspective. In: Lahlou, S. (ed.) Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments. Springer, London (2009)Google Scholar
  33. Hollan, J.D., Hutchins, E., Kirsh, D.: Distributed Cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2), 174–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000) (reprint)Google Scholar
  35. Jordan, B., Henderson, A.: Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(1), 39–65 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korpela, M., Mursu, A., Soriyan, A.: Two Times Four Integrative Levels of Analysis: A Framework (and a bit of a case). In: Russo, N.L., Fitzgerald, B., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development. The Social and Organizational Perspective: IFIP TC8/WG8.2 Working Conference on the Social and Organizational Perspective. Kluwer Academic, Boston (2001)Google Scholar
  37. Korpela, M., Mursu, A., Soriyan, A.: Activity Networks in Context: ActAD as a Method for Information Systems Research and Practice in Nigeria. In: ISCRAT 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  38. Lamb, C.M.T.: Collaborative Systems Thinking. An exploration of the mechanisms enabling systems thinking (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  39. Latour, B.: Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  40. Law, J., Callon, M.: Leben und Sterben eines Flugzeuges: Eine Netzwerkanalyse technischen Wandels. In: Belliger, A., Krieger, D.J. (eds.) ANThology. Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie, pp. 447–482. Transcript, Bielefeld (2006)Google Scholar
  41. Leon’tev, A.N.: Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1978)Google Scholar
  42. Lewin, K.: Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2(4), 34–46 (1946)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ludvigsen, S.R., Havnes, A., Lahn, L.C.: Workplace learning across activity systems: A case study of sales engineers. In: Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y. (eds.) Between School and Work. New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing, pp. 291–310. Emerald, United Kingdom (2008)Google Scholar
  44. Miettinen, R.: Contradictions of high-technology capitalism and the emergence of new forms of work. In: Sannino, A., Daniels, H., Gutiérrez, K.D. (eds.) Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory, pp. 160–175. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moser, H.A., Ziegler, G.D.S., Blessing, L.T.M., Braukhane, A.: Development of systems thinking in multi-disciplinary team interaction: two cases from space industry. In: Marjanovic, D., Storga, M., Pavkovic, N., Bojcetic, N. (eds.) 12th International Design Conference (DESIGN), pp. 1929–1940. University of Zagreb, Zagreb (2012)Google Scholar
  46. Mwanza, D.: Towards an Activity-Oriented Design Method for HCI research and practice (Doctoral dissertation). The Open University, Milton Keynes (2002)Google Scholar
  47. Mwanza-Simwami, D.: AODM as a framework and model for characterising learner experiences with technology. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society 7(3), 75–85 (2011)Google Scholar
  48. Orr, J.E.: Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. ILR Press, Ithaca (1996)Google Scholar
  49. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  50. Pettigrew, A.M.: Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organization Science 1(3), 267–292 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pike, K.L.: Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. Summer Institute of linguistics, Glendale (1954)Google Scholar
  52. Randall, D., Harper, R., Rouncefield, M.: Fieldwork for Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  53. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), 696–734 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barden, B., Bergmann, J., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Günthner, S., Meier, C., Quasthoff, U., Schlobinski, P., Uhmann, S.: Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem, GAT (1999), http://www.teachsam.de/deutsch/d_lingu/gespraechsanalyse/ (retrieved on December 03, 2012)
  55. Simon, H.A.: The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  56. Smith, M.K.: Kurt Lewin, groups, experiential learning and action research (2001), http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-lewin.htm (retrieved on August 20, 2012)
  57. Song, J.Y., Kracheel, M., Ziegler, G.D.S., Moser, H.A.: Critical Interaction Instances in Collaborative Concurrent Engineering. In: Thoben, K.-D., Stich, V., Imtiaz, A. (eds.) 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE 2011). Innovating products and services for collaborative networks, Aachen (2011)Google Scholar
  58. Soter, A.O., Wilkinson, I.A., Murphy, P.K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., Edwards, M.: What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research 47(6), 372–391 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strauss, A.L.: Social organization of medical work. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Grounded theory in practice. Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks (1997)Google Scholar
  61. Toiviainen, H.: Learning across levels. Challenges of collaboration in a small-firm network (Doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinki (2003)Google Scholar
  62. Vygotsky, L.S., Cole, M. (eds.): Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, 2nd edn. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1979)Google Scholar
  63. Vygotsky, L.S., Kozulin, A.: Thought and language (Translation newly rev. and edited). MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  64. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: Design and methods, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  65. Ziegler, G.D.S., Song, J.Y., Kracheel, M., Moser, H.A.: Analysing critical interaction instances in collaborative concurrent engineering: satellite development. International Journal of Product Development 17(1/2), 153–169 (2012), doi:10.1504/IJPD.2012.051157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LuxSpace Sárl BetzdorfLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations