Incremental Grid-Like Layout Using Soft and Hard Constraints

  • Steve Kieffer
  • Tim Dwyer
  • Kim Marriott
  • Michael Wybrow
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8242)

Abstract

We explore various techniques to incorporate grid-like layout conventions into a force-directed, constraint-based graph layout framework. In doing so we are able to provide high-quality layout—with predominantly axis-aligned edges—that is more flexible than previous grid-like layout methods and which can capture layout conventions in notations such as SBGN (Systems Biology Graphical Notation). Furthermore, the layout is easily able to respect user-defined constraints and adapt to interaction in online systems and diagram editors such as Dunnart.

Keywords

constraint-based layout grid layout interaction diagram editors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barsky, A., Gardy, J.L., Hancock, R.E., Munzner, T.: Cerebral: a cytoscape plugin for layout of and interaction with biological networks using subcellular localization annotation. Bioinformatics 23(8), 1040–1042 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brandes, U., Eiglsperger, M., Kaufmann, M., Wagner, D.: Sketch-driven orthogonal graph drawing. In: Goodrich, M.T., Kobourov, S.G. (eds.) GD 2002. LNCS, vol. 2528, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chrobak, M., Payne, T.H.: A linear-time algorithm for drawing a planar graph on a grid. Information Processing Letters 54(4), 241–246 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., Tollis, I.G.: Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dwyer, T., Koren, Y., Marriott, K.: IPSep-CoLa: An incremental procedure for separation constraint layout of graphs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5), 821–828 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dwyer, T., Marriott, K., Stuckey, P.J.: Fast node overlap removal. In: Healy, P., Nikolov, N.S. (eds.) GD 2005. LNCS, vol. 3843, pp. 153–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dwyer, T., Marriott, K., Wybrow, M.: Dunnart: A constraint-based network diagram authoring tool. In: Tollis, I.G., Patrignani, M. (eds.) GD 2008. LNCS, vol. 5417, pp. 420–431. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dwyer, T., Marriott, K., Wybrow, M.: Topology preserving constrained graph layout. In: Tollis, I.G., Patrignani, M. (eds.) GD 2008. LNCS, vol. 5417, pp. 230–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gansner, E.R., Koren, Y., North, S.C.: Graph drawing by stress majorization. In: Pach, J. (ed.) GD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3383, pp. 239–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kieffer, S., Dwyer, T., Marriott, K., Wybrow, M.: Incremental grid-like layout using soft and hard constraints. Tech. Rep. 2013/275, Monash University (2013), http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/publications/2013/tr-2013-275-full.pdf
  11. 11.
    Kojima, K., Nagasaki, M., Jeong, E., Kato, M., Miyano, S.: An efficient grid layout algorithm for biological networks utilizing various biological attributes. BMC Bioinformatics 8(1), 76 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Le Novère, N., et al.: The Systems Biology Graphical Notation. Nature Biotechnology 27, 735–741 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, W., Kurata, H.: A grid layout algorithm for automatic drawing of biochemical networks. Bioinformatics 21(9), 2036–2042 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marriott, K., Purchase, H., Wybrow, M., Goncu, C.: Memorability of visual features in network diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(12), 2477–2485 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Nöllenburg, M., Wolff, A.: Drawing and labeling high-quality metro maps by mixed-integer programming. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(5), 626–641 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ryall, K., Marks, J., Shieber, S.: An interactive constraint-based system for drawing graphs. In: Robertson, G.G., Schmandt, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 97–104. ACM Press (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stott, J., Rodgers, P., Martinez-Ovando, J.C., Walker, S.G.: Automatic metro map layout using multicriteria optimization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(1), 101–114 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugiyama, K., Misue, K.: Graph drawing by the magnetic spring model. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 6(3), 217–231 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, Y.S., Chi, M.T.: Focus+context metro maps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(12), 2528–2535 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Kieffer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tim Dwyer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kim Marriott
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Wybrow
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Caulfield School of Information TechnologyMonash UniversityCaulfieldAustralia
  2. 2.Victoria LaboratoryNational ICT AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations