Advertisement

Evidence for Response Consistency Supports Polychronous Neural Groups as an Underlying Mechanism for Representation and Memory

  • Mira Guise
  • Alistair Knott
  • Lubica Benuskova
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8272)

Abstract

Izhikevich [6] has proposed that certain strongly connected groups of neurons known as polychronous neural groups (or PNGs) might provide the neural basis for representation and memory. Polychronous groups exist in large numbers within the connection graph of a spiking neural network, providing a large repertoire of structures that can potentially match an external stimulus [6,8]. In this paper we examine some of the requirements of a representational system and test the idea of PNGs as the underlying mechanism against one of these requirements, the requirement for consistency in the neural response to stimuli. The results provide preliminary evidence for consistency of PNG activation in response to known stimuli, although these results are limited by problems with the current methods for detecting PNG activation.

Keywords

spiking network polychronous neural group activation representation memory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, W.C.: Metaplasticity: tuning synapses and networks for plasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9(5), 387–387 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caporale, N., Dan, Y.: Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a hebbian learning rule. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 25–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caroni, P., Donato, F., Muller, D.: Structural plasticity upon learning: regulation and functions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13(7), 478–490 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guise, M., Knott, A., Benuskova, L.: Consistency of polychronous neural group activation supports a role as an underlying mechanism for representation and memory: detailed methods and results. Tech. rep., Dept of Computer Science, University of Otago, Dunedin (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffmann, H., Howard, M.D., Daily, M.J.: Fast pattern matching with time-delay neural networks. In: The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 2424–2429. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Izhikevich, E.M.: Polychronization: computation with spikes. Neural Computation 18(2), 245–282 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izhikevich, E.M.: Reference software implementation for the Izhikevich model: minimal spiking network that can polychronize (2006), http://www.izhikevich.org/publications/spnet.htm
  8. 8.
    Izhikevich, E.M., Gally, J.A., Edelman, G.M.: Spike-timing dynamics of neuronal groups. Cerebral Cortex 14(8), 933–944 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, S., Grimwood, P., Morris, R.: Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23(1), 649–711 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martinez, R., Paugam-Moisy, H.: Algorithms for structural and dynamical polychronous groups detection. In: Alippi, C., Polycarpou, M., Panayiotou, C., Ellinas, G. (eds.) ICANN 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5769, pp. 75–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mira Guise
    • 1
  • Alistair Knott
    • 1
  • Lubica Benuskova
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of Computer ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations