Abstract
Fuzzy measures (FMs) encode the worth (or importance) of different subsets of information sources in the fuzzy integral (FI). It is well-known that the Choquet FI (CFI) often reduces to an elementary aggregation operator for different selections of the FM. However, FMs are often learned from training data or they are derived from the densities (worth of just the singletons). In these situations an important question arises; what is the resultant CFI really doing? Is it aggregating data relative to an additive measure, a possibility measure, or something more complex and unique? Herein, we introduce new indices (distance formulas) and fuzzy sets that capture the degree to which the CFI is behaving like a set of known aggregation operators. This has practical application in terms of gaining a deeper understanding into a given problem, guiding new learning methods and evaluating the CFI’s benefit.
Keywords
- Membership Function
- Quadratic Program
- Ground Penetrate Radar
- Membership Degree
- Aggregation Operator
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Grabisch, M., Nguyen, H.T., Walker, E.A.: Fundamentals of uncertainty calculi with applications to fuzzy inference. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994)
Anderson, D., Keller, J., Havens, T.: Learning fuzzy-valued fuzzy measures for the fuzzy-valued sugeno fuzzy integral. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010. LNCS, vol. 6178, pp. 502–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Keller, J.M., Osborn, J.: Training the fuzzy integral. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 15(1), 1–24 (1996)
Mendez-Vazquez, A., Gader, P., Keller, J., Chamberlin, K.: Minimum classification error training for choquet integrals with applications to landmine detection. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 16(1), 225–238 (2008)
Sugeno, M.: Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and Its Applications. Ph.D. thesis. Tokyo Institute of Technology (1974)
Keller, J.M., Auephanwiriyakul, S., Gader, P.D.: New fuzzy set tools to aid in predictive sensor fusion. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4038, pp. 1497–1507 (2000)
Keller, J.M., Auephanwiriyakul, S., Gader, P.D.: Experiments in predictive sensor fusion. In: Proc. SPIE 4394, pp. 1047–1058 (2001)
Grabisch, M., Roubens, M.: Application of the choquet integral in multicriteria decision making. In: Fuzzy Measures and Integrals, pp. 348–374. Physica Verlag (2000)
Keller, J.M., Gader, P., Tahani, H., Chiang, J.H., Mohamed, M.: Advances in fuzzy integration for pattern recognition. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 65(23), 273–283 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Price, S.R., Anderson, D.T., Wagner, C., Havens, T.C., Keller, J.M. (2014). Indices for Introspection on the Choquet Integral. In: Jamshidi, M., Kreinovich, V., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Advance Trends in Soft Computing. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 312. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03674-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03674-8_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03673-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03674-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)