Behavior of Elastomeric Seismic Isolators Varying Rubber Material and Pad Thickness: A Numerical Insight

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 256)

Abstract

A numerical approach for the determination of (a) the shear behavior under large displacements and (b) the compression elastic modulus of common parallelepiped elastomeric isolators is presented. Particular attention is devoted to the role played by the material used for the rubber pads and their thickness. For them, an experimental data fitting by means of both a nine constants Mooney-Rivlin and a five constants exponential law is utilized, within a Finite Element discretization of the isolator. Having at disposal a few experimental stretch-stress data points for each rubber compound in uniaxial tension, a cubic Bezier spline approach is firstly utilized, to generate numerically a large number of metadata containing the original experimental ones. Then, respectively the nine Mooney-Rivlin and five exponential law constitutive parameters are estimated through a least square approach. Once assessed the models, a full scale rectangular seismic isolator is analyzed when subjected to horizontal actions and normal compression, in order to provide estimates of the initial stiffness and the overall behavior of the isolator undergoing large deformations, using both models and for all the compounds considered. It is found that the global behavior may depend significantly on the material hypothesis assumed to model rubber and on pads thickness.

Keywords

Elastomeric Isolators Rubber Typology Compounds Performance Stretch-strain Behavior under Large Deformations Numerical Model Simulations Finite Element Method Pad Thickness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amin, A.F.M.S., Alam, M.S., Okui, Y.: An improved hyperelasticity relation in modeling viscoelasticity response of natural and high damping rubbers in compression: experiments, parameter identification, and numerical verification. Mech. Mater. 34, 75–95 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amin, A.F.M.S., Wiraguna, I., Bhuiyan, A.R., Okui, Y.: Hyperelasticity Model for Finite Element Analysis of Natural and High Damping Rubbers in Compression and Shear. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 132(1), 54–64 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM D2240-91. Standard test method for fubber property- Durometer hardness. Annual book of ASTM standard, 388–391 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braga, F., Dolce, M., Ferrigno, A., Laterza, M., Marotta, G., Masi, A., Nigro, D., Ponzo, F.: Development of new materials for seismic isolation and passive energy dissipation - part i: experimental tests on new compound elastomeric bearings. In: Proc. International Post-SMiRT Conference Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Seismic Vibrations of Structures Taormina, Italy (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    British Standard 903 (1950, 1957). Methods of testing vulcanized rubber, Part 19 (1950) and Part A7 (1957)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bueche, F.: Mullins effect and rubber-filler interaction. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 5(15), 271–281 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Luca, A., Imbimbo, M.: F. E. stress analysis of rubber bearings under axial loads. Computers and Structures 68, 31–39 (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gent, A.N.: Rubber elasticity: basic concepts and behavior. In: Eirich, F.R. (ed.) Science and Technology Rubber. Academic Press, NY (1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai, H.-C.: Compression analysis of rectangular elastic layers bonded between rigid plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures 42(11-12), 3395–3410 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelly, J.M.: Base Isolation of Structures. Design Guidelines. Holmes Consulting Group Ltd., Wellington (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milani, G., Milani, F.: Stretch-stress behavior of elastomeric seismic isolators with different rubber materials. A numerical insight. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 138(5), 416–429 (2012a)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milani, G., Milani, F.: Elastomeric seismic isolators behavior at different pads thickness. In: Pina, N., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Proc. 2nd International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, Rome, IT, July 28-31 (2012b)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moon, B.Y., Kang, G.J., Kang, B.S., Kim, G.S., Kelly, J.M.: Mechanical properties of seismic isolation system with fiber-reinforced bearing of strip type. International Applied Mechanics 39(10), 1231–1239 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mooney, M.: A theory of large elastic deformation. J. Appl. Physics 2, 582–592 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    OPCM 3431: Ulteriori modifiche ed integrazioni all’OPCM 3274/ 03 20/03/2003. Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica (2005) (in Italian)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qi, H.J., Joyce, K., Boyce, M.C.: Durometer hardness and the stress-strain behavior of elastomeric materials. Rubber Chemistry and Technology 72(2), 419–435 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Studebaker, M.L., Beatty, J.R.: The rubber compound and its composition. In: Eirich, F.R. (ed.) Science and Technology of Rubber. Academic Press, NY (1978)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tobolsky, A.V., Mark, H.F.: Polymer Science and Materials, ch. 13. Wiley, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsai, H.S., Kelly, J.M.: Stiffness Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Rectangular Seismic Isolators. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 128(4), 462–470 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsai, H.S., Lee, C.C.: Tilting stiffness of elastic layers bonded between rigid plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures 36(17), 2485–2505 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Chem.Co ConsultantOcchiobelloItaly

Personalised recommendations